57 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 2000–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Williams v. Taylorgreen2 sentences2017Our Supreme Court has summarized the standard applied to claims of ineffective assistance of counsel as follows: A defendant claiming a violation of the right to effective assistance of counsel must establish the two components set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); accord Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 390-91 , 120 S.Ct. 1495 , 146 L.Ed.2d 389 (2000). 2017Our Supreme Court has summarized the standard applied to claims of ineffective assistance of counsel as follows: A defendant claiming a violation of the right to effective assistance of counsel must establish the two components set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); accord Williams v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 390-91 , 120 S.Ct. 1495 , 146 L.Ed.2d 389 (2000). | 8 | 10 |
Timberlake v. Stategreen2 sentences2014In Timberlake v. State, 753 N.E.2d 591 (Ind. 2001), our 8 supreme court summarized the law regarding claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel, writing: A defendant claiming a violation of the right to effective assistance of counsel must establish the two components set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). 2014As Norment is claiming that his trial counsel was ineffective, our Supreme Court summarized such claims in Timberlake v. State, 753 N.E.2d 591, 603 (Ind. 2001), as follows: A defendant claiming a violation of the right to effective assistance of counsel must establish the two components set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). | 3 | 5 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2020Our supreme court has summarized the law regarding claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel as follows: A defendant claiming a violation of the right to effective assistance of counsel must establish the two components set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). 2019Our supreme court has summarized the law regarding claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel as follows: A defendant claiming a violation of the right to effective assistance of counsel must establish the two components set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). | 1 | 53 |
North v. Stategreen1 sentence2024See North v. State, 406 N.E.2d 657, 661 (Ind. Ct. App. 1980) (holding that a defendant claiming violation of sentencing rules must show prejudice and cannot complain when he is responsible for the delay). | 1 | 1 |
Reed v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Timberlake v. State, 753 N.E.2d 591, 603 (Ind. 2001); Reed v. State, 856 N.E.2d 1189, 1195 (Ind. 2006) (“The standard of review for a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is the same as for trial counsel . . . .”). | 1 | 1 |
Ben-Yisrayl v. Stategreen1 sentence2015See Jervis v. State, 28 N.E.3d 361, 368 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015), trans. denied (citing Ben-Yisrayl v. State, 738 N.E.2d 253, 258 (Ind. 2000)). [10] Our supreme court has summarized the law regarding claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel as follows: A defendant claiming a violation of the right to effective assistance of counsel must establish two components set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
Mark M. Jervis v. State of Indianagreen1 sentence2015See Jervis v. State, 28 N.E.3d 361, 368 (Ind. Ct. App. 2015), trans. denied (citing Ben-Yisrayl v. State, 738 N.E.2d 253, 258 (Ind. 2000)). [10] Our supreme court has summarized the law regarding claims of ineffective assistance of trial counsel as follows: A defendant claiming a violation of the right to effective assistance of counsel must establish two components set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). | 1 | 1 |
Rose v. Stategreen1 sentence2010Rose v. State, 846 N.E.2d 363, 366 (Ind.Ct.App.2006). | 1 | 1 |
Lambert v. Stategreen1 sentence2002A reasonable probability is a probability sufficient to undermine the confidence in the outcome"" Lambert v. State, 743 N.E.2d 719, 730 (Ind.2001) (quoting Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687, 694 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 LEd.2d 674 (1984)). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Murrell v. State
green
2 sentences2020Id. 2015Id. | 2 | 2015–2020 |
Allen v. State
green
1 sentence2015Id. [17] A defendant claiming a violation of the right to effective assistance of trial or appellate counsel must establish the two components set forth in Strickland v. Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 18A02-1410-PC-728 | November 30, 2015 Page 12 of 28 Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Richardson v. State
green
1 sentence2013Id. at 832- 33. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Young v. State
green
1 sentence2006Young v. State, 746 N.E.2d 920, 926 (Ind.2001). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.