14 Virginia opinions name it 2 courts 1971–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Kotteakos v. United Statesgreen2 sentences2014A hospital or other medical facility record shall be admitted if attached to it is a sworn statement of the custodian thereof that the same is a true and accurate copy of the record of such hospital or other medical facility. . . . -5- When it plainly appears from the record and the evidence given at the trial that the parties have had a fair trial on the merits and substantial justice has been reached, no judgment shall be arrested or reversed . . . [f]or any . . . defect, imperfection, or omission in the record, or for any other error committed on the trial. “‘If, when all is said and done, 2014A hospital or other medical facility record shall be admitted if attached to it is a sworn statement of the custodian thereof that the same is a true and accurate copy of the record of such hospital or other medical facility. . . . -5- When it plainly appears from the record and the evidence given at the trial that the parties have had a fair trial on the merits and substantial justice has been reached, no judgment shall be arrested or reversed . . . [f]or any . . . defect, imperfection, or omission in the record, or for any other error committed on the trial. “‘If, when all is said and done, | 2 | 2 |
Clay v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2014A hospital or other medical facility record shall be admitted if attached to it is a sworn statement of the custodian thereof that the same is a true and accurate copy of the record of such hospital or other medical facility. . . . -5- When it plainly appears from the record and the evidence given at the trial that the parties have had a fair trial on the merits and substantial justice has been reached, no judgment shall be arrested or reversed . . . [f]or any . . . defect, imperfection, or omission in the record, or for any other error committed on the trial. “‘If, when all is said and done, 2014A hospital or other medical facility record shall be admitted if attached to it is a sworn statement of the custodian thereof that the same is a true and accurate copy of the record of such hospital or other medical facility. . . . -5- When it plainly appears from the record and the evidence given at the trial that the parties have had a fair trial on the merits and substantial justice has been reached, no judgment shall be arrested or reversed . . . [f]or any . . . defect, imperfection, or omission in the record, or for any other error committed on the trial. “‘If, when all is said and done, | 2 | 2 |
Schwartz v. Schwartzgreen2 sentences2014A hospital or other medical facility record shall be admitted if attached to it is a sworn statement of the custodian thereof that the same is a true and accurate copy of the record of such hospital or other medical facility. . . . -5- When it plainly appears from the record and the evidence given at the trial that the parties have had a fair trial on the merits and substantial justice has been reached, no judgment shall be arrested or reversed . . . [f]or any . . . defect, imperfection, or omission in the record, or for any other error committed on the trial. “‘If, when all is said and done, 2014A hospital or other medical facility record shall be admitted if attached to it is a sworn statement of the custodian thereof that the same is a true and accurate copy of the record of such hospital or other medical facility. . . . -5- When it plainly appears from the record and the evidence given at the trial that the parties have had a fair trial on the merits and substantial justice has been reached, no judgment shall be arrested or reversed . . . [f]or any . . . defect, imperfection, or omission in the record, or for any other error committed on the trial. “‘If, when all is said and done, | 2 | 2 |
Rowland v. Com.green2 sentences2018Rowland v. Commonwealth, 281 Va. 396, 399 , 707 S.E.2d 331, 333 (2011). 3 The bullet entered Beasley’s left lower back and exited the right side of his abdomen. 2018Rowland v. Commonwealth, 281 Va. 396, 399 , 707 S.E.2d 331, 333 (2011). 3 The bullet entered Beasley’s left lower back and exited the right side of his abdomen. | 1 | 1 |
Robinson v. Com.green2 sentences2010The circuit court had the opportunity to examine the witnesses' demeanor during their testimony, and all the evidence, including the packaging, and the baggie that contained the cocaine and baggie corners. [*] After observing Officer Coleman's testimony and examining the evidence, the circuit court made a finding of fact that there is was no variance in the descriptions of the item by Officer Coleman and the laboratory "because the officer never said that it was one rock per baggy corner." "On review, we will not disturb the factual findings of the trial court unless plainly wrong or unsupport 2010The circuit court had the opportunity to examine the witnesses' demeanor during their testimony, and all the evidence, including the packaging, and the baggie that contained the cocaine and baggie corners. [*] After observing Officer Coleman's testimony and examining the evidence, the circuit court made a finding of fact that there is was no variance in the descriptions of the item by Officer Coleman and the laboratory "because the officer never said that it was one rock per baggy corner." "On review, we will not disturb the factual findings of the trial court unless plainly wrong or unsupport | 1 | 1 |
Armstrong v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences2002See Armstrong v. Commonwealth, 29 Va. App. 102, 110-11 , 510 S.E.2d 247, 250-51 (1999) (explaining that officers have probable cause to arrest a suspect observed holding something that, based on the officers' experience, training, and the surrounding circumstances, they believe or suspect is illegal narcotics). 2002See Armstrong v. Commonwealth, 29 Va. App. 102, 110-11 , 510 S.E.2d 247, 250-51 (1999) (explaining that officers have probable cause to arrest a suspect observed holding something that, based on the officers' experience, training, and the surrounding circumstances, they believe or suspect is illegal narcotics). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Chadwickred1 sentence1992Laboratory analysis proved the substance to be a psilocyn mushroom. “[T]he Fourth Amendment . . . protects people from unreasonable government intrusions.” United States v. Chadwick, 433 U.S. 1, 7 (1977). | 1 | 1 |
Grinton v. Commonwealthgreen2 sentences1992“A consensual search is reasonable if the search is within *317 the scope of the consent given.” Grinton v. Commonwealth, 14 Va. App. 846, 850 , 419 S.E.2d 860, 862 (1992). 1992“A consensual search is reasonable if the search is within *317 the scope of the consent given.” Grinton v. Commonwealth, 14 Va. App. 846, 850 , 419 S.E.2d 860, 862 (1992). | 1 | 1 |
Bowers v. Capital Equipment Co.green1 sentence1971Moore v. Commonwealth, 211 Va. 569, 570 , 179 S.E.2d 458, 460 (1971); Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Perdieu v. Blackstone Family Practice Center, Inc.
green
1 sentence2024The testimony in this case is that there was a physician’s order for a lab test and the nursing home didn’t carry it out. - 16 - Crawford knew the standard of care for a nurse regarding each of these situations, (2) whether she knew “what conduct conforms or fails to conform to those standards,” and (3) whether she had an “active clinical practice in either the [nursing staff’s] specialty or a related field of medicine within one year of the date of the alleged act or omission forming the basis of the action.” Perdieu, 264 Va. at 419 . i. Nurse Crawford satisfied the “knowledge” requirement. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Commonwealth v. Hudson
green
2 sentences2016As in Hudson, the jury was entitled to evaluate Carter’s “theory of innocence upon consideration of all the evidence and the reasonable inferences that flow from that evidence.” 265 Va. at 517 , 578 S.E.2d at 787 . 2016As in Hudson, the jury was entitled to evaluate Carter’s “theory of innocence upon consideration of all the evidence and the reasonable inferences that flow from that evidence.” 265 Va. at 517 , 578 S.E.2d at 787 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Davis v. Washington
green
2 sentences2011The Commonwealth contends that the evidence in this case reflects that the "primary purpose" of the laboratory test was medical treatment, rather than "to prove past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecutions." Davis, 547 U.S. at 833 , 126 S.Ct. 2266 . 2011The Commonwealth contends that the evidence in this case reflects that the "primary purpose" of the laboratory test was medical treatment, rather than "to prove past events potentially relevant to later criminal prosecutions." Davis, 547 U.S. at 833 , 126 S.Ct. 2266 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Auer v. Miller
neutral
1 sentence2005Id. at 177, 613 S.E.2d at 423 . | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Walton v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence2002"In order to convict a person of illegal possession of an illicit drug, the Commonwealth must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused was aware of the presence and character of the drug and that the accused consciously possessed it." Walton v. Commonwealth, 255 Va. 422, 426 , 497 S.E.2d 894 , 899 (1994) (citation omitted). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Stockton v. Commonwealth
green
2 sentences1985Viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, see Stockton v. Commonwealth, 227 Va. 124, 145-46 , 314 S.E.2d 371, 385 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 873 (1984), we hold that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. 1985Viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, see Stockton v. Commonwealth, 227 Va. 124, 145-46 , 314 S.E.2d 371, 385 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 873 (1984), we hold that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Bottoson v. Florida
green
1 sentence1985Viewing the evidence and all reasonable inferences drawn therefrom in the light most favorable to the Commonwealth, see Stockton v. Commonwealth, 227 Va. 124, 145-46 , 314 S.E.2d 371, 385 , cert. denied, 469 U.S. 873 (1984), we hold that the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdict. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Arnold v. Reynolds
green
2 sentences1980The toxicologist who conducted the analysis testified that such a content produces a condition which causes a “distracting effect on the vision” and that the eyes “have a tendency to wander back and forth until [focus] is voluntarily directed. . . .” 215 Va. at 432 , 211 S.E.2d at 47 . 1980The toxicologist who conducted the analysis testified that such a content produces a condition which causes a “distracting effect on the vision” and that the eyes “have a tendency to wander back and forth until [focus] is voluntarily directed. . . .” 215 Va. at 432 , 211 S.E.2d at 47 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Schmerber v. California
green
2 sentences1971Moore v. Commonwealth, 211 Va. 569, 570 , 179 S.E.2d 458, 460 (1971); Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966). 1971Moore v. Commonwealth, 211 Va. 569, 570 , 179 S.E.2d 458, 460 (1971); Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966). | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Moore v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1971Moore v. Commonwealth, 211 Va. 569, 570 , 179 S.E.2d 458, 460 (1971); Schmerber v. California, 384 U.S. 757 , 86 S.Ct. 1826 , 16 L.Ed.2d 908 (1966). | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.