mandatory arbitration clause in Washington

2003Mortenson Co. v. Timberline Software Corp., 140 Wn.2d 568, 587 , 998 P.2d 305 (2000) (citing Brower v. Gateway 2000, Inc., 246 A.D.2d 246, 254 , 676 N.Y.S.2d 569 (1998)), which required the use of a French arbitration company, payment of a nonrefundable advance fee and travel fees, and payment of the loser’s attorney fees.

2003Mortenson Co. v. Timberline Software Corp., 140 Wn.2d 568, 587 , 998 P.2d 305 (2000) (citing Brower v. Gateway 2000, Inc., 246 A.D.2d 246, 254 , 676 N.Y.S.2d 569 (1998)), which required the use of a French arbitration company, payment of a nonrefundable advance fee and travel fees, and payment of the loser’s attorney fees.

2002Stein does not resolve this discrete issue; with citation to Garmo, 101 Wash.2d at 590 , 681 P.2d 253 , the Stein court merely notes in passing that CPA claims "are not exempt from a mandatory arbitration clause." Stein, 105 Wash.App. at 49 n. 1, 17 P.3d 1266 .

2002Stein does not resolve this discrete issue; with citation to Garmo, 101 Wn.2d at 590 , the Stein court merely notes in passing that CPA claims “are not exempt from a mandatory arbitration clause.” Stein, 105 Wn.

2015In addition, "[a] party that prevails on a summary judgment motion may recover costs 'incurred in taking depositions specifically considered by the trial court.'" Estep v. Hamilton. 148 Wn.

2015RCW 4.84.010 states, in pertinent part: The measure and mode of compensation of attorneys and counselors, shall be left to the agreement, expressed or implied, of the parties, but there shall be allowed to the prevailing party upon the judgment certain sums for the prevailing party’s expenses in the action, which allowances are termed costs, including, in addition to costs otherwise authorized by law, the following expenses: (7) To the extent that the court or arbitrator finds that it was necessary to achieve the successful result, the reasonable expense of the transcription of depositions use

2003Mortenson Co. v. Timberline Software Corp., 140 Wash.2d 568, 587 , 998 P.2d 305 (2000) (citing Brower v. Gateway 2000, Inc., 246 A.D.2d 246, 254 , 676 N.Y.S.2d 569 (1998)), which required the use of a French arbitration company, payment of a nonrefundable advance fee and travel fees, and payment of the loser's attorney fees.

2003Mortenson Co. v. Timberline Software Corp., 140 Wn.2d 568, 587 , 998 P.2d 305 (2000) (citing Brower v. Gateway 2000, Inc., 246 A.D.2d 246, 254 , 676 N.Y.S.2d 569 (1998)), which required the use of a French arbitration company, payment of a nonrefundable advance fee and travel fees, and payment of the loser’s attorney fees.

2003Mortenson Co. v. Timberline Software Corp., 140 Wash.2d 568, 587 , 998 P.2d 305 (2000) (citing Brower v. Gateway 2000, Inc., 246 A.D.2d 246, 254 , 676 N.Y.S.2d 569 (1998)), which required the use of a French arbitration company, payment of a nonrefundable advance fee and travel fees, and payment of the loser's attorney fees.

2003Mortenson Co. v. Timberline Software Corp., 140 Wn.2d 568, 587 , 998 P.2d 305 (2000) (citing Brower v. Gateway 2000, Inc., 246 A.D.2d 246, 254 , 676 N.Y.S.2d 569 (1998)), which required the use of a French arbitration company, payment of a nonrefundable advance fee and travel fees, and payment of the loser’s attorney fees.

2002Stein does not resolve this discrete issue; with citation to Garmo, 101 Wash.2d at 590 , 681 P.2d 253 , the Stein court merely notes in passing that CPA claims "are not exempt from a mandatory arbitration clause." Stein, 105 Wash.App. at 49 n. 1, 17 P.3d 1266 .

2002Stein does not resolve this discrete issue; with citation to Garmo, 101 Wn.2d at 590 , the Stein court merely notes in passing that CPA claims “are not exempt from a mandatory arbitration clause.” Stein, 105 Wn.

2015App. 246, 260 , 201 P.3d 331 (2008) (quoting Herried v. Pierce County Pub.

2012Trowbridge v. Walsh, 51 Wn.

2002Stein does not resolve this discrete issue; with citation to Garmo, 101 Wash.2d at 590 , 681 P.2d 253 , the Stein court merely notes in passing that CPA claims "are not exempt from a mandatory arbitration clause." Stein, 105 Wash.App. at 49 n. 1, 17 P.3d 1266 .

1999App. 295, 298 , 773 P.2d 429 (1989) — a case explaining the purpose of the mandatory arbitration rule attorney fee provision).

1997Those costs recoverable pursuant to RCW 4.84.010 include "(1) Piling fees; "(2) Pees for the service of process .... "(3) Fees for service by publication; "(4) Notary fees .... "(5) Reasonable expenses, exclusive of attorneys’ fees, incurred in obtaining reports and records, which are admitted into evidence at trial or in mandatory arbitration in superior or district court. . . "(6) Statutory attorney and witness fees; and "(7) To the extent that the court or arbitrator finds that it was necessary to achieve the successful result, the reasonable expense of the transcription of depositions used

1997Those costs recoverable pursuant to RCW 4.84.010 include "(1) Piling fees; "(2) Pees for the service of process .... "(3) Fees for service by publication; "(4) Notary fees .... "(5) Reasonable expenses, exclusive of attorneys’ fees, incurred in obtaining reports and records, which are admitted into evidence at trial or in mandatory arbitration in superior or district court. . . "(6) Statutory attorney and witness fees; and "(7) To the extent that the court or arbitrator finds that it was necessary to achieve the successful result, the reasonable expense of the transcription of depositions used

1995App. 712, 717 , 815 P.2d 293 (1991), review denied, 118 Wn.2d 1013 (1992) (right to attorney fees under the mandatory arbitration rule extends to appeals).