warrant meets the particularity requirement (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

warrant meets the particularity requirement in Washington

14 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Clarkgreen
wash · 2001 · cited in 6 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2007–2024
2 sentences

2024State v. Reep, 161 Wn.2d 808, 813 , 167 P.3d 1156 (2007); see also State v. Clark, 143 Wn.2d 731, 753 , 24 P.3d 1006 (“Whether a warrant meets the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment is reviewed de novo.”), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1000 (2001).

2007STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶[12 “Whether a warrant meets the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment is reviewed de novo.” State v. Clark, 143 Wn.2d 731, 753 , 24 P.3d 1006 (2001).

36
State v. Clarkgreen
wash · 2001 · cited in 6 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2007–2024
2 sentences

2024State v. Reep, 161 Wn.2d 808, 813 , 167 P.3d 1156 (2007); see also State v. Clark, 143 Wn.2d 731, 753 , 24 P.3d 1006 (“Whether a warrant meets the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment is reviewed de novo.”), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1000 (2001).

2007STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶[12 “Whether a warrant meets the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment is reviewed de novo.” State v. Clark, 143 Wn.2d 731, 753 , 24 P.3d 1006 (2001).

36
Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. v. Bradley Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. v. Brownlow and Pre-Paid Legal Services, Inc. v. Mealeygreen
scotus · 2004 · cited in 1 Washington opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
1 sentence

2024State v. Reep, 161 Wn.2d 808, 813 , 167 P.3d 1156 (2007); see also State v. Clark, 143 Wn.2d 731, 753 , 24 P.3d 1006 (“Whether a warrant meets the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment is reviewed de novo.”), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1000 (2001).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Perrone green
wash · 1992
2 sentences

2018State v. Perrone, 119 Wash.2d 538 , 549, 834 P.2d 611 (1992).

2018State v. Perrone, 119 Wash.2d 538 , 549, 834 P.2d 611 (1992).

31997–2018
State v. Stenson green
wash · 1997
2 sentences

2013"Whether a warrant meets the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment is reviewed de novo." State v. Stenson, 132 Wn.2d 668,691 , 940 P.2d 1239 (1997).

2001State v. Stenson, 132 Wn.2d 668, 691 , 940 P.2d 1239 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1008 (1998).

32001–2013
State v. Stenson green
wash · 1997
2 sentences

2013"Whether a warrant meets the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment is reviewed de novo." State v. Stenson, 132 Wn.2d 668,691 , 940 P.2d 1239 (1997).

2001State v. Stenson, 132 Wn.2d 668, 691 , 940 P.2d 1239 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1008 (1998).

32001–2013
State v. Reep neutral
wash · 2007
2 sentences

2024State v. Reep, 161 Wn.2d 808, 813 , 167 P.3d 1156 (2007); see also State v. Clark, 143 Wn.2d 731, 753 , 24 P.3d 1006 (“Whether a warrant meets the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment is reviewed de novo.”), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1000 (2001).

2016State v. Reep, 161 Wn.2d 808, 813 , 167 46 45724-5-II / 46300-8-II P.3d 1156 (2007).

22016–2024
State v. Riley green
wash · 1993
2 sentences

2007ANALYSIS ¶13 “The Fourth Amendment mandates that warrants describe with particularity the things to be seized.” State v. Riley, 121 Wn.2d 22, 28 , 846 P.2d 1365 (1993).

2007ANALYSIS ¶13 “The Fourth Amendment mandates that warrants describe with particularity the things to be seized.” State v. Riley, 121 Wn.2d 22, 28 , 846 P.2d 1365 (1993).

22007–2007
Teel v. Johnson green
scotus · 1998
2 sentences

2001State v. Stenson, 132 Wash.2d 668, 691 , 940 P.2d 1239 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1008 , 118 S.Ct. 1193 , 140 L.Ed.2d 323 (1998).

2001State v. Stenson, 132 Wn.2d 668, 691 , 940 P.2d 1239 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1008 (1998).

22001–2001
State v. Reep green
wash · 2007
1 sentence

2024State v. Reep, 161 Wn.2d 808, 813 , 167 P.3d 1156 (2007); see also State v. Clark, 143 Wn.2d 731, 753 , 24 P.3d 1006 (“Whether a warrant meets the particularity requirement of the Fourth Amendment is reviewed de novo.”), cert. denied, 543 U.S. 1000 (2001).

12024–2024
State v. Besola green
wash · 2015
1 sentence

2018In Besola, the Washington Supreme Court held the citation to a statute did not "modify or limit the items listed in the warrant" that "contained broad descriptions of the items to be seized." Besola, 184 Wn.2d at 609-10 .

12018–2018
Garcia Perez v. Johnson green
scotus · 1998
2 sentences

2001State v. Stenson, 132 Wash.2d 668, 691 , 940 P.2d 1239 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1008 , 118 S.Ct. 1193 , 140 L.Ed.2d 323 (1998).

2001State v. Stenson, 132 Wash.2d 668, 691 , 940 P.2d 1239 (1997), cert. denied, 523 U.S. 1008 , 118 S.Ct. 1193 , 140 L.Ed.2d 323 (1998).

12001–2001

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 2.06.040 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 9.68A.050 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 9.68A.070 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

WA 14 (1997–2024) OH 4 (2017–2026)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check