Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1984–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jahnke v. Stategreen2 sentences1990Respondent argues that the State Fund raised the dependency issue first on appeal. ‘“Our rule is that in the absence of fundamental error affecting a substantial right of the appellant or involving the jurisdiction of the court, we do not consider questions sought to be raised for the first time on appeal.'" Hyde v. State, 769 P.2d 376, 381 (Wyo.1989) (quoting Jahnke v. State, 692 P.2d 911, 928 (Wyo.1984)). 1990See W.S. 14-2-104, right to bring paternity actions; effect of agreements; proceedings when child is not yet born; W.S. 14-2-113, effect and contents of judgment or order; new birth certificate; determination of support; continuing jurisdiction; W.S. 14-2-204, liability for support; right of action; venue; service; measure of recovery; remedy is cumulative; execution; W.S. 20-3-101 through 20-3-104, desertion of wife or children; and W.S. 20-6-101 through 20-6-401, child support enforcement as a list which is not exhaustive and relates in some fashion to support of children. [11] Respondent ar | 7 | 7 |
Davis v. Stategreen2 sentences2019“Our rule is that in the absence of fundamental error affecting a substantial right of the appellant an issue raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered.” Davis v. State, 859 P.2d 89, 94 (Wyo. 1993). 2014"Our rule is that in the absence of fundamental error affecting a substantial right of the appellant an issue raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered." Davis v. State, 859 P.2d 89, 94 (Wyo.1993). | 4 | 4 |
Hyde v. Stategreen2 sentences1990Respondent argues that the State Fund raised the dependency issue first on appeal. ‘“Our rule is that in the absence of fundamental error affecting a substantial right of the appellant or involving the jurisdiction of the court, we do not consider questions sought to be raised for the first time on appeal.'" Hyde v. State, 769 P.2d 376, 381 (Wyo.1989) (quoting Jahnke v. State, 692 P.2d 911, 928 (Wyo.1984)). 1990See W.S. 14-2-104, right to bring paternity actions; effect of agreements; proceedings when child is not yet born; W.S. 14-2-113, effect and contents of judgment or order; new birth certificate; determination of support; continuing jurisdiction; W.S. 14-2-204, liability for support; right of action; venue; service; measure of recovery; remedy is cumulative; execution; W.S. 20-3-101 through 20-3-104, desertion of wife or children; and W.S. 20-6-101 through 20-6-401, child support enforcement as a list which is not exhaustive and relates in some fashion to support of children. [11] Respondent ar | 2 | 3 |
Belden v. Stategreen2 sentences2014"Our rule is that in the absence of fundamental error affecting a substantial right of the appellant an issue raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered." Belden, 2003 WY 89, ¶ 55 , 73 P.3d at 1090 (quoting Davis v. State, 859 P.2d 89, 94 (Wyo.1993)). 2014"Our rule is that in the absence of fundamental error affecting a substantial right of the appellant an issue raised for the first time on appeal will not be considered." Belden, 2003 WY 89, ¶ 55 , 73 P.3d at 1090 (quoting Davis v. State, 859 P.2d 89, 94 (Wyo.1993)). | 1 | 2 |
Jaime Solis v. The State of Wyominggreen2 sentences2014However, "[plrosecutorial misconduct implicates the right to a fair trial and, as a consequence, due process of law." Solis v. State, 2013 WY 152, ¶ 42 , 315 P.3d 622, 632 (Wyo.2013) (citing Donnelly v. De-Christoforo, 416 U.S. 637, 643 , 94 S.Ct. 1868, 1871 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974)). 2014However, "[plrosecutorial misconduct implicates the right to a fair trial and, as a consequence, due process of law." Solis v. State, 2013 WY 152, ¶ 42 , 315 P.3d 622, 632 (Wyo.2013) (citing Donnelly v. De-Christoforo, 416 U.S. 637, 643 , 94 S.Ct. 1868, 1871 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974)). | 1 | 1 |
Baum v. Stategreen2 sentences1993Hyde, 769 P.2d at 381 ; Baum v. State, 745 P.2d 877, 882 (Wyo.1987). 1993Hyde, 769 P.2d at 381 ; Baum v. State, 745 P.2d 877, 882 (Wyo.1987). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hopkinson v. State
green
2 sentences1989Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 664 P.2d 43 (1983), cert. denied [464] U.S. [908], 104 S.Ct. 262 , 78 L.Ed.2d 246 (1983); Nickelson v. People, Wyo., 607 P.2d 904 (1980); and Nisonger v. State, Wyo., 581 P.2d 1094 (1978). 1986Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 664 P.2d 43 (1983), cert. denied 464 U.S. 908 , 104 S.Ct. 262 , 78 *175 L.Ed.2d 246 (1983); Nickelson v. People, Wyo., 607 P.2d 904 (1980); and Nisonger v. State, Wyo., 581 P.2d 1094 (1978). | 4 | 1984–1989 |
Nickelson v. People
green
2 sentences1989Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 664 P.2d 43 (1983), cert. denied [464] U.S. [908], 104 S.Ct. 262 , 78 L.Ed.2d 246 (1983); Nickelson v. People, Wyo., 607 P.2d 904 (1980); and Nisonger v. State, Wyo., 581 P.2d 1094 (1978). 1986Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 664 P.2d 43 (1983), cert. denied 464 U.S. 908 , 104 S.Ct. 262 , 78 *175 L.Ed.2d 246 (1983); Nickelson v. People, Wyo., 607 P.2d 904 (1980); and Nisonger v. State, Wyo., 581 P.2d 1094 (1978). | 4 | 1984–1989 |
Nisonger v. State
green
2 sentences1989Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 664 P.2d 43 (1983), cert. denied [464] U.S. [908], 104 S.Ct. 262 , 78 L.Ed.2d 246 (1983); Nickelson v. People, Wyo., 607 P.2d 904 (1980); and Nisonger v. State, Wyo., 581 P.2d 1094 (1978). 1986Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 664 P.2d 43 (1983), cert. denied 464 U.S. 908 , 104 S.Ct. 262 , 78 *175 L.Ed.2d 246 (1983); Nickelson v. People, Wyo., 607 P.2d 904 (1980); and Nisonger v. State, Wyo., 581 P.2d 1094 (1978). | 4 | 1984–1989 |
Lindsey v. Louisiana
green
2 sentences1986Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 664 P.2d 43 (1983), cert. denied 464 U.S. 908 , 104 S.Ct. 262 , 78 *175 L.Ed.2d 246 (1983); Nickelson v. People, Wyo., 607 P.2d 904 (1980); and Nisonger v. State, Wyo., 581 P.2d 1094 (1978). 1986Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 664 P.2d 43 (1983), cert. denied 464 U.S. 908 , 104 S.Ct. 262 , 78 L.Ed.2d 246 (1983); Nickelson v. People, Wyo., 607 P.2d 904 (1980); and Nisonger v. State, Wyo., 581 P.2d 1094 (1978). | 2 | 1986–1986 |
Donnelly v. DeChristoforo
green
2 sentences2014However, "[plrosecutorial misconduct implicates the right to a fair trial and, as a consequence, due process of law." Solis v. State, 2013 WY 152, ¶ 42 , 315 P.3d 622, 632 (Wyo.2013) (citing Donnelly v. De-Christoforo, 416 U.S. 637, 643 , 94 S.Ct. 1868, 1871 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974)). 2014However, "[plrosecutorial misconduct implicates the right to a fair trial and, as a consequence, due process of law." Solis v. State, 2013 WY 152, ¶ 42 , 315 P.3d 622, 632 (Wyo.2013) (citing Donnelly v. De-Christoforo, 416 U.S. 637, 643 , 94 S.Ct. 1868, 1871 , 40 L.Ed.2d 431 (1974)). | 1 | 2014–2014 |
TR v. Washakie County Department of Public Assistance & Social Services
green
1 sentence1987We quote from TR v. Washakie County Department of Public Assistance and Social Services, supra, 736 P.2d at 719 -720: “ * * * The rule to be applied is well settled: * * * [I]n the absence of fundamental error affecting a substantial right of the appellant or involving the jurisdiction of the court, we do not consider questions sought to be raised for the first time on appeal. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.