Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
14 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Aldridge v. Stategreen2 sentences2018Aldridge v. State , 956 P.2d 341 , 343 (Wyo. 1998). 2002STANDARD OF REVIEW [17] Pursuant to statutory direction, the district court ordered Hart to pay restitution of $150 per month. 1 Appellate review of a restitution order "is confined to a search for procedural error or a clear abuse of discretion." Stowe v. State, 10 P.3d 551, 553 (Wyo.2000) (quoting Aldridge v. State, 956 P.2d 341, 343 (Wyo.1998)). | 6 | 7 |
Penner v. Stategreen2 sentences2014Penner v. State, 2003 WY 143, ¶ 7 , 78 P.3d 1045, 1047 (Wyo.2003). 2014Penner v. State, 2003 WY 143, ¶ 7 , 78 P.3d 1045, 1047 (Wyo.2003). | 4 | 4 |
Brown v. Stategreen2 sentences2003In reaching this conclusion, the majority has substituted its own determination of reasonable restitution for that of the district court. [¶ 19] As the majority stated, our review of an order of restitution "is confined to a search for procedural error or a clear abuse of discretion." ¶ 9 (citing Brown v. State, 2003 WY 72 , ¶ 9- 70 P.3d 238, ¶ 9 (Wyo. *1186 2003)). 2003In reaching this conclusion, the majority has substituted its own determination of reasonable restitution for that of the district court. [¶ 19] As the majority stated, our review of an order of restitution "is confined to a search for procedural error or a clear abuse of discretion." ¶ 9 (citing Brown v. State, 2003 WY 72 , ¶ 9- 70 P.3d 238, ¶ 9 (Wyo. *1186 2003)). | 2 | 2 |
Alcaraz v. Stategreen2 sentences2003Alcaraz v. State, 2002 WY 57, ¶5 , 44 P.3d 68, ¶5 (Wyo.2002). 2003Alcaraz v. State, 2002 WY 57, ¶5 , 44 P.3d 68, ¶5 (Wyo.2002). | 1 | 1 |
Stowe v. Stategreen1 sentence2002STANDARD OF REVIEW [17] Pursuant to statutory direction, the district court ordered Hart to pay restitution of $150 per month. 1 Appellate review of a restitution order "is confined to a search for procedural error or a clear abuse of discretion." Stowe v. State, 10 P.3d 551, 553 (Wyo.2000) (quoting Aldridge v. State, 956 P.2d 341, 343 (Wyo.1998)). | 1 | 1 |
Christensen v. Stategreen1 sentence1998Christensen v. State, 854 P.2d 675, 678 (Wyo.1993). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State, Department of Transportation v. Robbins
green
1 sentence2008Penner v. State, 2008 WY 148, ¶ 7 , 78 P.3d 1045, 1047-48 (Wyo.2003). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Ford v. State
green
2 sentences2007Id. [¶ 14] The standard of review of restitution orders is confined to a search for procedural error or a clear abuse of discretion. 2007Id. [¶ 14] The standard of review of restitution orders is confined to a search for procedural error or a clear abuse of discretion. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.