Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1974–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
ILLINOIS DEPT. OF HUMAN SERVICES v. Portergreen2 sentences2015Department of Human Services v. Porter, 396 Ill. 2015Department of Human Services v. Porter, 396 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Smith v. City of Evanstongreen2 sentences2004It is, like the nature, extent and duration of the injury, a matter to take into account when assessing the proper, separable elements of damages.” Smith, 260 Ill. 2004It is, like the nature, extent and duration of the injury, a matter to take into account when assessing the proper, separable elements of damages." Smith , 260 Ill. | 1 | 4 |
Gary Teachers Union Local No. 4 v. School City of Garygreen1 sentence1974Clair County Board of Commissioners, 43 Misc.App. 342, 204 N.W.2d 369 (1972), involving a grievance procedure and where an arbitration statute was in force, the court determined, on page 345, “It would be most incongruous if the Legislature, in providing for compulsory arbitration of such matters, traditionally the subject of mutual agreement, did not at least permit compulsory arbitration of the comparatively minor disputes bound to arise from time to time in the administration of the contract.” In Local 958, AFSCME v. School District, 66 LRRM 2420, the court recognized: “(1) the collective b | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Parvin v. Sill
green
2 sentences1997Insofar as Parvin v. Sill (1985), 138 Ill. 1997Insofar as Parvin v. Sill, 138 Ill. | 3 | 1994–1997 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
1 sentence2022Citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), Powers accused Rubin of deficient performance. ¶ 10 In his prayer for relief, Powers asked for (1) a declaration that Doll and Rubin “have a duty” to him, (2) a court order mandating that the public defender’s office create “a separate division *** for ‘SVP’ cases,” “actual costs” for any “undue delay past ‘120’ days,” court costs, and any further relief to which Powers is entitled. ¶ 11 Defendants, represented by the county’s state’s attorney, filed a motion to dismiss Powers’s complaint, pursuant to section 2-619 of the Code of Civil Proc | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Geneva Construction Co. v. Martin Transfer & Storage Co.
green
1 sentence1993The court rejected the argument as it “would restore the formalistic approach to amendments to pleadings which the legislature has sought to eliminate.” Geneva, 4 Ill. 2d at 289 . | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Currie v. Lao
green
1 sentence1992App. 3d 625 , 556 N.E.2d 318 , aff’d (1992), 148 Ill. 2d 151 (Currie), was misplaced and contrary to legislative and judicial intention; and (2) that the court should have granted Powers’ motion for a directed verdict on his affirmative defense. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Currie v. Lao
green
1 sentence1992App. 3d 625 , 556 N.E.2d 318 , aff’d (1992), 148 Ill. 2d 151 (Currie), was misplaced and contrary to legislative and judicial intention; and (2) that the court should have granted Powers’ motion for a directed verdict on his affirmative defense. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Central School District No. 1 v. Litz
neutral
2 sentences1974In Central School District No. 1 v. Litz, 304 N.Y.S.2d 372 , 60 Misc.2d 1009 (1969), where there was a statute authorizing arbitration, the court determined, on page 376, “[T]he statute authorizes arbitration, the contract delimits the arbitrator’s powers to rule in accordance with law and the court retains power to confirm or reject the decision. * * * Under the circumstances, there is no illegal delegation of power.” In Local 1518, AFSCME v. St. 1974In Central School District No. 1 v. Litz, 304 N.Y.S.2d 372 , 60 Misc.2d 1009 (1969), where there was a statute authorizing arbitration, the court determined, on page 376, “[T]he statute authorizes arbitration, the contract delimits the arbitrator’s powers to rule in accordance with law and the court retains power to confirm or reject the decision. * * * Under the circumstances, there is no illegal delegation of power.” In Local 1518, AFSCME v. St. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Local 1518, American Federation of State, County v. St. Clair Cty. Bd. of Commrs
green
1 sentence1974Clair County Board of Commissioners, 43 Misc.App. 342, 204 N.W.2d 369 (1972), involving a grievance procedure and where an arbitration statute was in force, the court determined, on page 345, “It would be most incongruous if the Legislature, in providing for compulsory arbitration of such matters, traditionally the subject of mutual agreement, did not at least permit compulsory arbitration of the comparatively minor disputes bound to arise from time to time in the administration of the contract.” In Local 958, AFSCME v. School District, 66 LRRM 2420, the court recognized: “(1) the collective b | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.