Free, and it takes a minute. A syfert.com account skips the bot checks on search and case pages, keeps your details and plan under the account icon, and comes with an MCP token for Claude, ChatGPT or any MCP-capable assistant, emailed to you with a link to the setup page and always available from the account icon.
Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Bernard Lumber Co. v. Louisiana Ins. Guar. Ass'ngreen1 sentence2022Bernard Lumber Company, Inc. v. Louisiana Insurance Guaranty Association, 563 So. 2d 261, 263 ( La. | 1 | 1 |
Saltamachia v. Parish of Jeffersongreen1 sentence2006Villa Del Rey Citizens Association v. City of Baton Rouge, 233 So.2d 566, 568 (La.App. 1st Cir.1970); Saltamachia v. Parish of Jefferson, 579 So.2d 1197, 1199 (La.App. 5th Cir.1991). | 1 | 1 |
Villa Del Rey Citizens Ass'n v. City of Baton Rougegreen1 sentence2006Villa Del Rey Citizens Association v. City of Baton Rouge, 233 So.2d 566, 568 (La.App. 1st Cir.1970); Saltamachia v. Parish of Jefferson, 579 So.2d 1197, 1199 (La.App. 5th Cir.1991). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Coopergreen1 sentence2002See State v. Tanner, 425 So.2d 760 (La.1983) and State v. Cooper, 449 So.2d 1376 (La.App. 2 Cir.1984). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Tannergreen1 sentence2002See State v. Tanner, 425 So.2d 760 (La.1983) and State v. Cooper, 449 So.2d 1376 (La.App. 2 Cir.1984). | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Donald Teaguegreen1 sentence2002See United States v. Teague, 953 F.2d 1525 (11th Cir. 1992), cert denied, 506 U.S. 842 , 113 S.Ct. 127 (1992). | 1 | 1 |
Brown v. Browngreen1 sentence2002See United States v. Teague, 953 F.2d 1525 (11th Cir. 1992), cert denied, 506 U.S. 842 , 113 S.Ct. 127 (1992). | 1 | 1 |
Whitaker v. Hillgreen1 sentence2002See United States v. Teague, 953 F.2d 1525 (11th Cir. 1992), cert denied, 506 U.S. 842 , 113 S.Ct. 127 (1992). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Morgangreen1 sentence1976State v. Morgan, 315 So.2d 632, 636 (La.1975); State v. Williams, 310 So.2d 528, 532 (La.1975); State v. McKinney, 302 So.2d 917 (La.1974). [2] There was a question as to whether the trial judge considered the motion to quash to be the correct procedural vehicle to challenge the constitutionality of that statute. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Wilsongreen1 sentence1976See State v. Wilson, 315 So.2d 646 (La.1975); State v. Kibby, 294 So.2d 196 (La.1974); State v. Brumfield, 263 La. 147 , 267 So.2d 553 (1972). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Williamsgreen1 sentence1976State v. Morgan, 315 So.2d 632, 636 (La.1975); State v. Williams, 310 So.2d 528, 532 (La.1975); State v. McKinney, 302 So.2d 917 (La.1974). [2] There was a question as to whether the trial judge considered the motion to quash to be the correct procedural vehicle to challenge the constitutionality of that statute. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Parker
green
2 sentences2003State v. Parker, 625 So.2d at 1368 . . 1998In Parker, 625 So.2d at 1368 , the court stated: In our view, since transactional immunity would prevent any prosecution for the charged offense, a motion to quash would be the correct procedural vehicle to challenge an indictment which allegedly violated a grant of transactional immunity. | 2 | 1998–2003 |
Gutierrez v. Baldridge
green
2 sentences2015Gutierrez v. Baldridge, 10-1528 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/11/11) , 65 So.3d 251 , writ denied, 11-1589 (La.10/7/11), 71 So.3d 319 . 2015Gutierrez v. Baldridge, 10-1528 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/11/11) , 65 So.3d 251 , writ denied, 11-1589 (La.10/7/11), 71 So.3d 319 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Laurendine v. Board of Commissioners for Lrleans Levee District
green
1 sentence2015Gutierrez v. Baldridge, 10-1528 (La.App. 3 Cir. 5/11/11) , 65 So.3d 251 , writ denied, 11-1589 (La.10/7/11), 71 So.3d 319 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Stewart
green
1 sentence2014State v. 4Stewart, 04-1231, p. 12 (La.App. 5 Cir. 4/26/05), 902 So.2d 440, 448 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Russell v. Illinois Cent. Gulf R. Co.
green
1 sentence2008In Forman , the Court affirmed a trial court's annulment of a preliminary default judgment against Joe Belew; however, in that case, as in Russell, supra, exceptions had been filed by counsel for Belew. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2002Under these facts, I find that the appropriate procedural vehicle to test a defendant's claim that his defense counsel violated his right to testify is a claim in post-convicting relief for ineffective assistance of counsel subject to the two-prong analysis enunciated in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 (1984). 2002Under these facts, I find that the appropriate procedural vehicle to test a defendant's claim that his defense counsel violated his right to testify is a claim in post-convicting relief for ineffective assistance of counsel subject to the two-prong analysis enunciated in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 (1984). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Vincent v. Penrod Drilling Co.
green
2 sentences2001In fact, in Vincent v. Penrod Drilling Co., 372 So.2d 807 (La.App. 3 Cir.1979), the court went so far as to state that a peremptory exception of no right of action is the proper procedural vehicle to challenge a plaintiff's right to bring an action pursuant to the Direct Action Statute, LSA-R.S. 22:655(B). 2001Id. at 810 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Kibby
neutral
1 sentence1976See State v. Wilson, 315 So.2d 646 (La.1975); State v. Kibby, 294 So.2d 196 (La.1974); State v. Brumfield, 263 La. 147 , 267 So.2d 553 (1972). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
State v. Brumfield
green
2 sentences1976See State v. Wilson, 315 So.2d 646 (La.1975); State v. Kibby, 294 So.2d 196 (La.1974); State v. Brumfield, 263 La. 147 , 267 So.2d 553 (1972). 1976See State v. Wilson, 315 So.2d 646 (La.1975); State v. Kibby, 294 So.2d 196 (La.1974); State v. Brumfield, 263 La. 147 , 267 So.2d 553 (1972). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
State v. McKinney
green
1 sentence1976State v. Morgan, 315 So.2d 632, 636 (La.1975); State v. Williams, 310 So.2d 528, 532 (La.1975); State v. McKinney, 302 So.2d 917 (La.1974). [2] There was a question as to whether the trial judge considered the motion to quash to be the correct procedural vehicle to challenge the constitutionality of that statute. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Stevens v. Bd. of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of City of Shreveport
green
1 sentence1976In Stevens v. Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund, 309 So. 2d 144 (La.1975), our Supreme Court held that a peremptory exception to the use of a class action was the proper means to urge improper use of a class action. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.