opportunity for a formal hearing (Missouri) · Go Syfert
← Missouri issues

opportunity for a formal hearing in Missouri

13 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2024 7 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Furlong Companies v. City of Kansas Citygreen
mo · 2006 · cited in 8 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2008–2024
2 sentences

2024Furlong Cos. v. City of Kansas City, 189 S.W.3d 157, 165 (Mo. banc 2006). 7 See Chapter 536. 32 Contested cases provide the parties with an opportunity for a formal hearing with the presentation of evidence, including sworn testimony of witnesses and cross-examination of witnesses, and require written findings of fact and conclusions of law. . . .

2023“Contested cases provide the parties with an opportunity for a formal hearing with the presentation of evidence, including sworn testimony of witnesses and cross-examination of witnesses, and require written findings of fact and conclusions of law.” Furlong Companies, Inc. v. City of Kansas City, 189 S.W.3d 157, 165 (Mo. banc 2006).

58
Hagely v. Board of Education of Webster Groves School Districtgreen
mo · 1992 · cited in 4 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2006–2021
2 sentences

2021Hagely v. Board of Education of the Webster Groves School District, 841 S.W.2d 663, 668 (Mo. banc 1992).

2015Id. (citing Hagely v. Bd. of Educ., 841 S.W.2d 663, 668 (Mo. banc 1992))”; see also Section 536.070.

44
City of Valley Park v. Armstronggreen
mo · 2009 · cited in 2 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2015–2023
2 sentences

2023“Contested cases provide the parties with an opportunity for a formal hearing with the presentation of evidence, including sworn testimony of witnesses and cross-examination of witnesses, and require written findings of fact and conclusions of law.” Lampley v. Mo. Comm’n on Human Rights, 570 S.W.3d 16, 20 (Mo. banc 2019) (quoting Furlong Cos., 189 S.W.3d at 165 ). 9 “The classification of a case as ‘contested’ or ‘noncontested’ is determined as a matter of law.” City of Valley Park v. Armstrong, 273 S.W.3d 504, 506 (Mo. banc 2009). 9 Non-contested cases, on the other hand, “do not require form

2015Even when considered “in its entirety,” as Respondents urge, there is no way to view the agency determination of standing, nor of any other meeting or hearing from the issuance of this permit, as fitting within the definition of a contested case, which, as noted above, provides the parties “with an opportunity for a formal hearing with the presentation of evidence, including sworn testimony of witnesses and cross-examination of witnesses.” Valley Park, 273 S.W.3d at 506 (emphasis added).

22
Harold Lampley and Rene Frost v. The Missouri Commission on Human Rights and Alisa Warrengreen
mo · 2019 · cited in 1 Missouri opinions naming this issue, 2023–2023
1 sentence

2023“Contested cases provide the parties with an opportunity for a formal hearing with the presentation of evidence, including sworn testimony of witnesses and cross-examination of witnesses, and require written findings of fact and conclusions of law.” Lampley v. Mo. Comm’n on Human Rights, 570 S.W.3d 16, 20 (Mo. banc 2019) (quoting Furlong Cos., 189 S.W.3d at 165 ). 9 “The classification of a case as ‘contested’ or ‘noncontested’ is determined as a matter of law.” City of Valley Park v. Armstrong, 273 S.W.3d 504, 506 (Mo. banc 2009). 9 Non-contested cases, on the other hand, “do not require form

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
450 N. Lindbergh Legal Fund, LLC v. City of Creve Coeur green
moctapp · 2015
1 sentence

2021“Contested cases provide the parties an opportunity for a formal hearing with the presentation of evidence, including sworn testimony and cross-examination of witnesses, and contested cases require written findings of fact and conclusions of law.” Id.

12021–2021

Statutes the citing opinions construe

MO § Mo. Rev. Stat. § 536.010 (11) MO § Mo. Rev. Stat. § 536.150 (10) MO § Mo. Rev. Stat. § 536.100 (9) MO § Mo. Rev. Stat. § 536.140 (7) MO § Mo. Rev. Stat. § 536.070 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

MO 13 (2006–2024) TX 2 (2015–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check