Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
13 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1998–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Lobaughgreen2 sentences2021Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Lobaugh, 1988 OK 144 , ¶15, 781 P.2d 806 we held: Due process in disciplinary proceedings contemplates a fair and open hearing before a trial panel with notice and an opportunity to present evidence and argument, representation by counsel, if desired, compulsory process for obtaining favorable witnesses, information concerning the claims of the opposing party, reasonable opportunity to be heard, and the right to confront the unfavorable witnesses. 2021Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Lobaugh, 1988 OK 144 , ¶15, 781 P.2d 806 we held: Due process in disciplinary proceedings contemplates a fair and open hearing before a trial panel with notice and an opportunity to present evidence and argument, representation by counsel, if desired, compulsory process for obtaining favorable witnesses, information concerning the claims of the opposing party, reasonable opportunity to be heard, and the right to confront the unfavorable witnesses. | 2 | 4 |
State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Mothershedgreen2 sentences2015Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Mothershed, 2011 OK 84, ¶ 70 , 264 P.3d 1197, 1223 ("A Bar disciplinary proceeding is adversarial in nature, and a lawyer subject to discipline is provided with a fair and open hearing before a trial panel with notice and opportunity to present evidence and argument."). . 18 . 2015Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Mothershed, 2011 OK 84, ¶ 70 , 264 P.3d 1197, 1223 ("A Bar disciplinary proceeding is adversarial in nature, and a lawyer subject to discipline is provided with a fair and open hearing before a trial panel with notice and opportunity to present evidence and argument."). . 18 . | 2 | 2 |
Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16green2 sentences2016No. 16 of Payne Cnty. , 1982 OK 74, ¶10 , 648 P.2d 26 , where this Court described the procedural guarantees of due process: Procedural due process of law contemplates a fair and open hearing before a legally constituted court or other authority with notice and an opportunity to present evidence and argument, representation by counsel, if desired, and information concerning the claims of the opposing party with reasonable opportunity to controvert them. 2016No. 16 of Payne Cnty. , 1982 OK 74, ¶10 , 648 P.2d 26 , where this Court described the procedural guarantees of due process: Procedural due process of law contemplates a fair and open hearing before a legally constituted court or other authority with notice and an opportunity to present evidence and argument, representation by counsel, if desired, and information concerning the claims of the opposing party with reasonable opportunity to controvert them. | 1 | 4 |
STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. KNIGHTgreen2 sentences2015Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Knight , 2014 OK 71, at ¶ 11, 330 P.3d at 1220. 2015Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Knight , 2014 OK 71, at ¶ 11 , 330 P.3d at 1220 . | 1 | 1 |
PACK v. STATEgreen2 sentences2015Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Knight , 2014 OK 71, at ¶ 11, 330 P.3d at 1220. 2015Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Knight , 2014 OK 71, at ¶ 11 , 330 P.3d at 1220 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Van Horn Oil Co. v. Oklahoma Corp. Commission
green
2 sentences2013Corp. Com'n, 1988 OK 42, 18 , 753 P.2d 1359 , the Court stated: Procedural due process of law contemplates a fair and open hearing before a legally constituted court or other authority with notice and an opportunity to present evidence and argument, representation by counsel, if desired, and information concerning the claims of the opposing party with reasonable opportunity to controvert them. . 2013Corp. Com'n, 1988 OK 42, 18 , 753 P.2d 1359 , the Court stated: Procedural due process of law contemplates a fair and open hearing before a legally constituted court or other authority with notice and an opportunity to present evidence and argument, representation by counsel, if desired, and information concerning the claims of the opposing party with reasonable opportunity to controvert them. . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
In Re Amendment to the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings Rule 7, 5 O.S.2001, Ch. 1, App.1
green
2 sentences2007Due process in disciplinary hearings contemplates a fair and open hearing before a trial panel with notice and an opportunity to present evidence and argument, representation by counsel, if desired, compulsory process for obtaining favorable witnesses, information concerning the claims of the opposing party, reasonable opportunity to be heard, and the right to confront the unfavorable witnesses. [10] Rule 10.1, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 O.S.2001 Ch.1, App.-1, see note 2, supra. [11] Rule 6.2A, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 O.S.2001 Ch. 1, App. 1-A, see note 3, s 2007Due process in disciplinary hearings contemplates a fair and open hearing before a trial panel with notice and an opportunity to present evidence and argument, representation by counsel, if desired, compulsory process for obtaining favorable witnesses, information concerning the claims of the opposing party, reasonable opportunity to be heard, and the right to confront the unfavorable witnesses. [10] Rule 10.1, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 O.S.2001 Ch.1, App.-1, see note 2, supra. [11] Rule 6.2A, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 O.S.2001 Ch. 1, App. 1-A, see note 3, s | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Meadows v. Meadows
green
1 sentence2006Meadows v. Meadows, 1980 OK 158 , ¶ 7, 619 P.2d 598 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Bourne
green
2 sentences2001Bolusky, supra, note 23 at % 8, at 272. 51 . 1994 OK 78 , 880 P.2d 360 . 52 . 2001Bolusky, supra, note 23 at % 8, at 272. 51 . 1994 OK 78 , 880 P.2d 360 . 52 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.