13 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1990–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jesus Antonio Gonzalez-Ochoa v. The State of Wyominggreen2 sentences2017Gonzalez-Ochoa v. State, 2014 WY 14 , ¶ 18, 317 P.3d 599, 604-05 (Wyo. 2014). 2017Gonzalez-Ochoa v. State, 2014 WY 14 , ¶ 18, 317 P.3d 599, 604-05 (Wyo. 2014). | 3 | 3 |
Mowery v. Stategreen2 sentences2016Gonzalez-Ochoa v. State, 2014 WY 14 , ¶ 18, 317 P.3d 599, 604 (Wyo.2014) (citing Mowery v. State, 2011 WY 38, ¶ 13 , 247 P.3d 866, 870 (Wyo.2011)). 2016Gonzalez-Ochoa v. State, 2014 WY 14 , ¶ 18, 317 P.3d 599, 604 (Wyo.2014) (citing Mowery v. State, 2011 WY 38, ¶ 13 , 247 P.3d 866, 870 (Wyo.2011)). | 3 | 3 |
Palmeno v. Cashengreen2 sentences2000This statute is limited to its invocation "in those cases only where the plaintiff is contributorily negligent." Palmeno v. Cashen, 627 P.2d 163, 166 (Wyo.1981). 1990This statute is limited to its invocation "in those cases only where the plaintiff is contributorily negligent." Palmeno v. Cashen, 627 P.2d 163, 166 (Wyo. 1981). | 2 | 2 |
Schnitker v. Stategreen2 sentences2026Schnitker v. State, 2017 WY 96, ¶ 7 , 401 P.3d 39, 41 (Wyo. 2017). 2026Schnitker v. State, 2017 WY 96, ¶ 7 , 401 P.3d 39, 41 (Wyo. 2017). | 1 | 1 |
Keser v. Stategreen1 sentence2024Stat. Ann. § 6-1-104 (a)(x)(A). 3 The State argues that to satisfy the requirement of raising a proper theory of defense, the proposed jury instruction must normally relate to one of the fifty-five affirmative defenses listed in Keser v. State, 706 P.2d 263, 269 (Wyo. 1985). | 1 | 1 |
Bouwkamp v. Stategreen1 sentence2019Harnetty v. State , 2019 WY 21 , ¶ 29, 435 P.3d 368 , 374 (Wyo. 2019) (citing Bouwkamp v. State , 833 P.2d 486 , 490 (Wyo. 1992) ("Suggestion of an alternative charge is not a defense to the crime being prosecuted.")). | 1 | 1 |
Bush v. Stategreen2 sentences2019See, e.g. , Bush v. State , 2008 WY 108 , ¶ 59, 193 P.3d 203 , 218 (Wyo. 2008) (citation omitted) (explaining that the United States Constitution "permits judges to exclude evidence that is repetitive, only marginally relevant, or poses an undue risk of harassment, prejudice or confusion of the issues"); Marfil v. State , 2016 WY 12 , ¶ 25, 366 P.3d 969 , 975 (Wyo. 2016) (citation omitted) (approving the refusal of a proposed jury instruction that misstates the law). [¶21] Moreover, it is not a theory of defense to request that the jury be instructed on crimes the State has not charged. 2019See, e.g. , Bush v. State , 2008 WY 108 , ¶ 59, 193 P.3d 203 , 218 (Wyo. 2008) (citation omitted) (explaining that the United States Constitution "permits judges to exclude evidence that is repetitive, only marginally relevant, or poses an undue risk of harassment, prejudice or confusion of the issues"); Marfil v. State , 2016 WY 12 , ¶ 25, 366 P.3d 969 , 975 (Wyo. 2016) (citation omitted) (approving the refusal of a proposed jury instruction that misstates the law). [¶21] Moreover, it is not a theory of defense to request that the jury be instructed on crimes the State has not charged. | 1 | 1 |
John Henry Knospler, Jr. v. Stategreen2 sentences2017Knospler v. State, 2016 WY 1, ¶ 22 , 366 P.3d 479, 485 (Wyo. 2016). 2017Knospler v. State, 2016 WY 1, ¶ 22 , 366 P.3d 479, 485 (Wyo. 2016). | 1 | 1 |
Robert L. Kroenlein Trust ex rel. Alden v. Kirchhefergreen1 sentence2016Alden v. Kirchhefer, 2015 WY 127, ¶ 14 , 357 P.3d 1118, 1124 (Wyo.2015) (citing Adekale v. State, 2015 WY 30 , ¶ 12, 344 P.3d 761, 765 (Wyo.2015)), We review a district court's refusal of a proposed jury instruction for an abuse of discretion. | 1 | 1 |
Adebowale Oluseyi Adekale A/K/A Ted Adekalegreen2 sentences2016Alden v. Kirchhefer, 2015 WY 127, ¶ 14 , 357 P.3d 1118, 1124 (Wyo.2015) (citing Adekale v. State, 2015 WY 30 , ¶ 12, 344 P.3d 761, 765 (Wyo.2015)), We review a district court's refusal of a proposed jury instruction for an abuse of discretion. 2016Alden v. Kirchhefer, 2015 WY 127, ¶ 14 , 357 P.3d 1118, 1124 (Wyo.2015) (citing Adekale v. State, 2015 WY 30 , ¶ 12, 344 P.3d 761, 765 (Wyo.2015)), We review a district court's refusal of a proposed jury instruction for an abuse of discretion. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Harnetty v. State
green
1 sentence2019Harnetty v. State , 2019 WY 21 , ¶ 29, 435 P.3d 368 , 374 (Wyo. 2019) (citing Bouwkamp v. State , 833 P.2d 486 , 490 (Wyo. 1992) ("Suggestion of an alternative charge is not a defense to the crime being prosecuted.")). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Julian Robert Marfil v. State
green
2 sentences2019See, e.g. , Bush v. State , 2008 WY 108 , ¶ 59, 193 P.3d 203 , 218 (Wyo. 2008) (citation omitted) (explaining that the United States Constitution "permits judges to exclude evidence that is repetitive, only marginally relevant, or poses an undue risk of harassment, prejudice or confusion of the issues"); Marfil v. State , 2016 WY 12 , ¶ 25, 366 P.3d 969 , 975 (Wyo. 2016) (citation omitted) (approving the refusal of a proposed jury instruction that misstates the law). [¶21] Moreover, it is not a theory of defense to request that the jury be instructed on crimes the State has not charged. 2019See, e.g. , Bush v. State , 2008 WY 108 , ¶ 59, 193 P.3d 203 , 218 (Wyo. 2008) (citation omitted) (explaining that the United States Constitution "permits judges to exclude evidence that is repetitive, only marginally relevant, or poses an undue risk of harassment, prejudice or confusion of the issues"); Marfil v. State , 2016 WY 12 , ¶ 25, 366 P.3d 969 , 975 (Wyo. 2016) (citation omitted) (approving the refusal of a proposed jury instruction that misstates the law). [¶21] Moreover, it is not a theory of defense to request that the jury be instructed on crimes the State has not charged. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
cluster 2959678
green
1 sentence2016Alden v. Kirchhefer, 2015 WY 127, ¶ 14 , 357 P.3d 1118, 1124 (Wyo.2015) (citing Adekale v. State, 2015 WY 30 , ¶ 12, 344 P.3d 761, 765 (Wyo.2015)), We review a district court's refusal of a proposed jury instruction for an abuse of discretion. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Miller v. State
green
1 sentence2003The district court’s jury instruction on the substantive elements of first-degree arson adequately instructed the jury regarding the specific intent element of first-degree arson, leaving “ ‘no doubt as to under what circumstances the crime can be found to have been committed.’ ” Reilly, 2002 WY 156, ¶ 16 , 55 P.3d at 1265 (quoting Miller, 904 P.2d at 348 ). | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Reilly v. State
green
2 sentences2003Reilly, 2002 WY 156 , ¶ 9 n. 1, 55 P.3d at 1262 n. 1. [¶ 12] We conclude that the district court did not err in refusing this proposed jury instruction. 2003Reilly, 2002 WY 156 , ¶ 9 n. 1, 55 P.3d at 1262 n. 1. [¶ 12] We conclude that the district court did not err in refusing this proposed jury instruction. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Oien v. State
green
2 sentences1991Oien v. State, 797 P.2d 544 (Wyo.1990); Thom v. State, 792 P.2d 192 (Wyo.1990). [A] defendant has the right to have instructions on his theory of the case or his theory of defense presented to the jury if the instructions sufficiently inform the jury of the theory or defense and if competent evidence exists which supports the law expressed in the instructions. 1991Oien v. State, 797 P.2d 544 (Wyo. 1990); Thom v. State, 792 P.2d 192 (Wyo. 1990). [A] defendant has the right to have instructions on his theory of the case or his theory of defense presented to the jury if the instructions sufficiently inform the jury of the theory or defense and if competent evidence exists which supports the law expressed in the instructions. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Thom v. State
green
2 sentences1991Oien v. State, 797 P.2d 544 (Wyo.1990); Thom v. State, 792 P.2d 192 (Wyo.1990). [A] defendant has the right to have instructions on his theory of the case or his theory of defense presented to the jury if the instructions sufficiently inform the jury of the theory or defense and if competent evidence exists which supports the law expressed in the instructions. 1991Oien v. State, 797 P.2d 544 (Wyo. 1990); Thom v. State, 792 P.2d 192 (Wyo. 1990). [A] defendant has the right to have instructions on his theory of the case or his theory of defense presented to the jury if the instructions sufficiently inform the jury of the theory or defense and if competent evidence exists which supports the law expressed in the instructions. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.