Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Hawaii opinions name it 2 courts 1996–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Hawaii courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Medeiros v. Choy.green1 sentence2021Cf. Medeiros, 142 Hawai#i at 246, 418 P.3d at 587 (holding that a plaintiff's proposed jury instruction to restrict consideration of plaintiff's motive in bringing suit was applicable to the issues raised, where defendant sought to elicit motive evidence for the purpose of demonstrating that plaintiff committed worker's compensation fraud for monetary gain and that the lawsuit was similarly motivated, and encouraged the jurors to so conclude in closing argument). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Haaniogreen2 sentences2009See State v. Haanio, 94 Hawai'i 405, 415-16 , 16 P.3d 246, 256-57 (2001). 2009See State v. Haanio, 94 Hawai'i 405, 415-16 , 16 P.3d 246, 256-57 (2001). | 1 | 1 |
Craft v. Peeblesgreen2 sentences1998The resulting “jury instructions ... when read and considered as a whole, ... [were thus] prejudicially insufficient[J” Craft v. Peebles, 78 Hawai'i 287, 302 , 893 P.2d 138, 153 (1995). 2. 1998The resulting “jury instructions ... when read and considered as a whole, ... [were thus] prejudicially insufficient[J” Craft v. Peebles, 78 Hawai'i 287, 302 , 893 P.2d 138, 153 (1995). 2. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Hawaii. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kobashigawa v. Silva.
green
2 sentences2018Choy's wife testified that she had wanted to inform the police that the child was not restrained during the accident so that the occupants of the car "would be aware that they always need to put the child in the child restraint seat for the safety of the child." Choy testified that he stopped his wife from relaying the information to law enforcement because he believed the occupants had "learned a lesson." 5 Medeiros also submitted a proposed jury instruction based on this court's decision in Kobashigawa v. Silva , 129 Hawai'i 313 , 300 P.3d 579 (2013), that would have informed the jury that t 2018Choy's wife testified that she had wanted to inform the police that the child was not restrained during the accident so that the occupants of the car "would be aware that they always need to put the child in the child restraint seat for the safety of the child." Choy testified that he stopped his wife from relaying the information to law enforcement because he believed the occupants had "learned a lesson." 5 Medeiros also submitted a proposed jury instruction based on this court's decision in Kobashigawa v. Silva , 129 Hawai'i 313 , 300 P.3d 579 (2013), that would have informed the jury that t | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. Lincoln
green
2 sentences1996Lincoln, 3 Haw.App. at 119 , 643 P.2d at 816 . 1996Lincoln, 3 Haw.App. at 119 , 643 P.2d at 816 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.