Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Arkansas opinions name it 1 courts 2018–2025 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Arkansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Watts v. Kelleygreen2 sentences2023Watts v. Kelley, 2019 Ark. 207 , 575 S.W.3d 558 . 2023Watts v. Kelley, 2019 Ark. 207 , 575 S.W.3d 558 . | 1 | 5 |
ANARIAN CHAD JACKSON v. WENDY KELLEY, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONgreen2 sentences2023We recently described the doctrine in Jackson v. Kelley, 2020 Ark. 251, at 4 , 602 S.W.3d 739 , 742: The abuse-of-the-writ doctrine may apply in habeas proceedings to subsume res judicata when the petitioner raises the same arguments addressed previously without bringing forward additional facts that would support his or her argument. 2020As I noted in my concurring opinion in Jackson v. Kelley, 2020 Ark. 251 , 602 S.W.3d 739 , the abuse-of-the-writ doctrine was announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Wong Doo v. United States, 265 U.S. 239 (1924). | 1 | 4 |
Jessie Hill v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correctiongreen1 sentence2025See Hill, 2024 Ark. 54 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arkansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wong Doo v. United States
green
2 sentences2023The abuse-of-the-writ-doctrine has been a standard part of habeas corpus jurisprudence since it was announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Wong 4 Doo v. United States, 265 U.S. 239 (1924). 2020The abuse-of-the-writ doctrine was announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Wong Doo v. United States, 265 U.S. 239 (1924). | 3 | 2020–2023 |
Anderson v. Kelley
green
2 sentences2019Anderson v. Kelley , 2018 Ark. 222 , at 4 n.3, 549 S.W.3d 913 , 915 n.3. 2018Id. | 2 | 2018–2019 |
Charles E. Jones v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Division of Correction
neutral
2 sentences2025Jones v. Payne, 2021 Ark. 37 , 618 S.W.3d 132 . 2025Jones v. Payne, 2021 Ark. 37 , 618 S.W.3d 132 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
MICHAEL ANDERSON v. DEXTER PAYNE, DIRECTOR, ARKANSAS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION
neutral
1 sentence2024Anderson v. Payne, 2021 Ark. 44 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Michael Anderson v. Wendy Kelley, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
green
2 sentences2021Anderson, 2020 Ark. 197 , 600 S.W.3d 544 ; see Jackson v. Kelley, 2020 Ark. 251 , 602 S.W.3d 739 . 2021Anderson, 2020 Ark. 197 , 600 S.W.3d 544 ; see Jackson v. Kelley, 2020 Ark. 251 , 602 S.W.3d 739 . | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Joe E. Morgan v. Dexter Payne, Director, Arkansas Department of Correction
neutral
2 sentences2020Morgan v. Payne, 2020 Ark. 239 , 602 S.W.3d 736 . 2020Morgan v. Payne, 2020 Ark. 239 , 602 S.W.3d 736 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.