12 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 2003–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Derrick Myran Frankson, (Two Cases)green2 sentences2007An approach similar to that followed by the Second Circuit in Lamia and Burns was adopted by the Fourth Circuit in United States v. Frankson, 83 F.3d 79, 81 (4th Cir.1996), where the defendant argued that the warning given to him "was not specific enough to satisfy the requirements set forth in Miranda . " The defendant had been advised of his "right to remain silent," his "right to an attorney," and his right to the appointment of a lawyer if he could not afford one. 2007An approach similar to that followed by the Second Circuit in Lamia and Burns was adopted by the Fourth Circuit in United States v. Frankson, 83 F.3d 79, 81 (4th Cir.1996), where the defendant argued that the warning given to him “was not specific enough to satisfy the requirements set forth in Miranda.” The defendant had been advised of his “right to remain silent,” his “right to an attorney,” and his right to the appointment of a lawyer if he could not afford one. | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Binger v. King Pest Control
green
1 sentence2026The defendant argued that the rule permitting nondisclosure of impeachment witnesses only applied to “situations in which the need for an impeachment witness is totally unforeseeable and arises from matters which come out for the first time during trial.” Id. at 1312 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Green v. State
green
1 sentence2026Id. at 680 . | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
1 sentence2020That is significantly different from this case where the standard is set by Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984). 4 In related ground two, the defendant argued that defense counsel had an erroneous understanding of the law; i.e., that sexual battery is a specific intent crime. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Bassallo v. State
green
1 sentence2012Id. at 1210 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Register v. State
green
1 sentence2012Id. 816 So.2d at 727 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Cardenas v. State
green
1 sentence2012Id. 816 So.2d at 727 . | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Pankow v. State
green
1 sentence2011There, the defendant argued error in permitting testimony that when the child’s custodian would attempt to bathe the victim in the tub, the victim would shake uncontrollably and scream “hot, hot, hot.” Id. at 1150 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
State v. McDonald
green
1 sentence2006Without first addressing whether a double jeopardy challenge to convictions was cognizable under rule 3.800(a), the court determined that State v. McDonald, 690 So.2d 1317 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997), controlled. | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Ross v. State
green
1 sentence2006In Ross , the defendant argued in a rule 3.800(a) motion that his sentences were illegal because his guideline scoresheet included both his grand theft and fraudulent use of a credit card convictions in violation *1226 of section 775.021(4)(b)(2), Florida Statutes (1993). [1] Ross, 760 So.2d at 214 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Banks v. State
green
2 sentences2006In Banks v. State, 842 So.2d 788 (Fla.2003), the defendant argued that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to consult mental health experts. 2006Id. at 790 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Cole v. State
green
2 sentences2005In Cole v. State, 841 So.2d 409 (Fla.2003), for example, the defendant argued that defense counsel was ineffective for failing to call certain witnesses to corroborate his drug abuse problems. 2005Id. at 414 n. 3. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Jones v. State
green
1 sentence2003Id. at 1125 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.