10 North Carolina opinions name it 3 courts 1995–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Fowlergreen2 sentences2010App. 564, 566 , 579 S.E.2d 499, 500 (2003), the defendant argued that the rule regarding shackling at trial should also apply when the trial court told the jury that the defendant was in the custody of the Wake County Sheriffs Department when explaining the reason for a delay in the proceeding. 2010On appeal, this Court rejected that argument, reasoning that “the statements by the trial court do not create the same prejudice to the defendant as that raised when a defendant appears in court in shackles or prison garb.” Id., 579 S.E.2d at 501 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. McDowell
green
1 sentence2025VEBBER Opinion of the Court necessary to deal with a threatening situation.” Id. at 194 . | 1 | 2025–2025 |
State v. McKinney
green
1 sentence2017Id. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Sturgill v. Ashe Memorial Hospital, Inc.
green
2 sentences2016Id. at 626-27 , 652 S.E.2d at 304 . 2016Id. at 626-27 , 652 S.E.2d at 304 . | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Hammonds
green
2 sentences2014Id. at 163 , 541 S.E.2d at 175 . 2014Id. at 163 , 541 S.E.2d at 175 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Cunningham v. Selman
green
2 sentences2014Id. at 275 , 689 S.E.2d at 521–22. 2014Id. at 275 , 689 S.E.2d at 521–22. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Wike v. Wike
green
2 sentences2008Id., 115 N.C. 2008Id., 115 N.C. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Ramirez
green
1 sentence2005Id. at 259 , 576 S.E.2d at 721. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Hartness
green
1 sentence1996Id. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Francis v. Franklin
green
2 sentences1995The defendant argued that the instruction was in violation of the holding in Franklin, 471 U.S. 307 , 85 L. 1995The defendant argued that the instruction was in violation of the holding in Franklin, 471 U.S. 307 , 85 L. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Sandstrom v. Montana
green
2 sentences1995Ed. 2d 344 , and Sandstrom, 442 U.S. 510 , 61 L. 1995Ed. 2d 344 , and Sandstrom, 442 U.S. 510 , 61 L. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.