Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 2006–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McLin v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Lynch v. State, 2 So.3d 47, 56 (Fla.2008) (citing Sochor v. State, 883 So.2d 766, 771-72 (Fla2004)); see also Lowe v. State, 2 So.3d 21, 29 (Fla.2008) (“Generally, this Court’s standard of review following a denial of a postconviction claim where the trial court has conducted an evidentiaiy hearing accords deference to the trial court’s factual findings.” (citing McLin v. State, 827 So.2d 948 , 954 n., 4 (Fla.2002))). “ ‘[T]his Court will not sub7 stitute its judgment for that of the trial court on questions of fact, likewise of the credibility of .the witnesses as well as the weight to be giv 2015Lynch v. State, 2 So.3d 47, 56 (Fla.2008) (citing Sochor v. State, 883 So.2d 766, 771-72 (Fla2004)); see also Lowe v. State, 2 So.3d 21, 29 (Fla.2008) (“Generally, this Court’s standard of review following a denial of a postconviction claim where the trial court has conducted an evidentiaiy hearing accords deference to the trial court’s factual findings.” (citing McLin v. State, 827 So.2d 948 , 954 n., 4 (Fla.2002))). “ ‘[T]his Court will not sub7 stitute its judgment for that of the trial court on questions of fact, likewise of the credibility of .the witnesses as well as the weight to be giv | 2 | 10 |
Lowe v. Stategreen2 sentences2025Espinosa argues that although he entered into a plea and informed the trial court during the plea colloquy that he was doing so voluntarily, he was coerced into taking the plea and his counsel was ineffective. “[T]his Court’s standard of review following a denial of a postconviction claim where the trial court has conducted an evidentiary hearing accords deference to the trial court’s factual findings.” Lowe v. State, 2 So. 3d 21, 29 (Fla. 2008). 2015Lynch v. State, 2 So.3d 47, 56 (Fla.2008) (citing Sochor v. State, 883 So.2d 766, 771-72 (Fla2004)); see also Lowe v. State, 2 So.3d 21, 29 (Fla.2008) (“Generally, this Court’s standard of review following a denial of a postconviction claim where the trial court has conducted an evidentiaiy hearing accords deference to the trial court’s factual findings.” (citing McLin v. State, 827 So.2d 948 , 954 n., 4 (Fla.2002))). “ ‘[T]his Court will not sub7 stitute its judgment for that of the trial court on questions of fact, likewise of the credibility of .the witnesses as well as the weight to be giv | 2 | 2 |
Blanco v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Lynch v. State, 2 So.3d 47, 56 (Fla.2008) (citing Sochor v. State, 883 So.2d 766, 771-72 (Fla2004)); see also Lowe v. State, 2 So.3d 21, 29 (Fla.2008) (“Generally, this Court’s standard of review following a denial of a postconviction claim where the trial court has conducted an evidentiaiy hearing accords deference to the trial court’s factual findings.” (citing McLin v. State, 827 So.2d 948 , 954 n., 4 (Fla.2002))). “ ‘[T]his Court will not sub7 stitute its judgment for that of the trial court on questions of fact, likewise of the credibility of .the witnesses as well as the weight to be giv 2008"As long as the trial court's findings are supported by competent substantial evidence, `this Court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court on questions of fact, likewise of the credibility of the witnesses as well as the weight to be given to the evidence by the trial court.'" Blanco v. State, 702 So.2d 1250, 1252 (Fla.1997) (quoting Demps v. State, 462 So.2d 1074, 1075 (Fla.1984)). | 2 | 2 |
Lynch v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Lynch v. State, 2 So.3d 47, 56 (Fla.2008) (citing Sochor v. State, 883 So.2d 766, 771-72 (Fla2004)); see also Lowe v. State, 2 So.3d 21, 29 (Fla.2008) (“Generally, this Court’s standard of review following a denial of a postconviction claim where the trial court has conducted an evidentiaiy hearing accords deference to the trial court’s factual findings.” (citing McLin v. State, 827 So.2d 948 , 954 n., 4 (Fla.2002))). “ ‘[T]his Court will not sub7 stitute its judgment for that of the trial court on questions of fact, likewise of the credibility of .the witnesses as well as the weight to be giv | 1 | 1 |
Sochor v. Stategreen1 sentence2015Lynch v. State, 2 So.3d 47, 56 (Fla.2008) (citing Sochor v. State, 883 So.2d 766, 771-72 (Fla2004)); see also Lowe v. State, 2 So.3d 21, 29 (Fla.2008) (“Generally, this Court’s standard of review following a denial of a postconviction claim where the trial court has conducted an evidentiaiy hearing accords deference to the trial court’s factual findings.” (citing McLin v. State, 827 So.2d 948 , 954 n., 4 (Fla.2002))). “ ‘[T]his Court will not sub7 stitute its judgment for that of the trial court on questions of fact, likewise of the credibility of .the witnesses as well as the weight to be giv | 1 | 1 |
Demps v. Stategreen1 sentence2008"As long as the trial court's findings are supported by competent substantial evidence, `this Court will not substitute its judgment for that of the trial court on questions of fact, likewise of the credibility of the witnesses as well as the weight to be given to the evidence by the trial court.'" Blanco v. State, 702 So.2d 1250, 1252 (Fla.1997) (quoting Demps v. State, 462 So.2d 1074, 1075 (Fla.1984)). | 1 | 1 |
Walls v. Stategreen1 sentence2007See Walls v. State, 926 So.2d 1156, 1165 (Fla.2006). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.