12 Florida opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Simmons v. State, Agency for Health Care Administrationgreen1 sentence2016In what amounts to a confession of error, the Department’s position is that Drew is barking up the wrong tree: rather than an expedited hearing under the exemption statutes, Drew is entitled to an administrative hearing pursuant to section 120.569(1) of the Florida Administrative Procedure Act, which the Department did not mention in its determination letters. § 120.569(1), Fla. Stat. (2015) (a hearing under section 120.57 is required when an agency’s decision affects or determines “the substantial interests of a party.”); Simmons v. State, Ag. for Health Care Admin., 950 So.2d 431, 432 (Fla. | 1 | 1 |
TANDEM HEALTH CARE v. Whitneygreen1 sentence2011Petersburg, Inc. v. Whitney, 897 So.2d 531, 532-33 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005)). | 1 | 1 |
Buhbut v. Bieluchgreen1 sentence2003See Buhbut v. Bieluch, 835 So.2d 1222 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003). | 1 | 1 |
City of Boca Raton v. Boca Raton Airport Auth.green1 sentence2001See City of Boca Raton v. Boca Raton Airport Authority, 768 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000)(reversing an ex parte, temporary injunction because there was no reason the city attorney could not have been notified by telephone of an expedited hearing). | 1 | 1 |
Barry v. Barchigreen2 sentences1991See, e.g., Barry v. Barchi, 443 U.S. 55 , 99 S.Ct. 2642 , 61 L.Ed.2d 365 (1979); Milton v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 542 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Aurora Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Business Regulation, 395 So.2d 604 ; Lerro v. Department of Professional Regulation, 388 So.2d 47 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). 1991See, e.g., Barry v. Barchi, 443 U.S. 55 , 99 S.Ct. 2642 , 61 L.Ed.2d 365 (1979); Milton v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 542 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Aurora Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Business Regulation, 395 So.2d 604 ; Lerro v. Department of Professional Regulation, 388 So.2d 47 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). | 1 | 1 |
Knight v. Stategreen1 sentence1987See Knight v. State, 443 So.2d 503 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Alexander v. Judd
green
2 sentences2019However, " Parker alone cannot be used as a basis to hold a defendant without bond as to any charges for which the defendant was not already on a form of pretrial release." Alexander v. Judd , 930 So.2d 847 , 849 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). 1 Because the State did not seek pretrial detention and the new charges did not allege a capital or life felony, we grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus and remand to the trial court to set an expedited hearing to determine the issue of pretrial release or detention according to rules 3.131 and 3.132. 2019However, " Parker alone cannot be used as a basis to hold a defendant without bond as to any charges for which the defendant was not already on a form of pretrial release." Alexander v. Judd , 930 So.2d 847 , 849 (Fla. 2d DCA 2006). 1 Because the State did not seek pretrial detention and the new charges did not allege a capital or life felony, we grant the petition for writ of habeas corpus and remand to the trial court to set an expedited hearing to determine the issue of pretrial release or detention according to rules 3.131 and 3.132. | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Bay Point Schools, Inc. v. Bay Point School Properties, Inc.
green
2 sentences2015As in Mendoza v. Cross, 143 So.3d 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014), we direct the trial court to conduct an expedited hearing at which it is to address whether there are conditions of release that will reasonably protect the community and assure the petitioner’s appearance. 2015As in Mendoza v. Cross, 143 So. 3d 1155 (Fla. 3d DCA 2014), we direct the trial court to conduct an expedited hearing at which it is to address whether there are conditions of release that will reasonably protect the community and assure the petitioner’s appearance. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Johnson, Pope, Bokor, Ruppel & Burns, LLP v. Forier
green
1 sentence2011Accordingly, the circuit court was required to conduct an expedited hearing in order to resolve the matter.” Id. at 452 (citing Tandem Health Care of St. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Lee v. State
green
1 sentence2008Lee v. State, 956 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Resendes v. Bradshaw, 935 So.2d 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Resendes v. Bradshaw
green
1 sentence2008Lee v. State, 956 So.2d 1292 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Resendes v. Bradshaw, 935 So.2d 19 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
P.R. v. Florida Department of Children & Families
neutral
1 sentence1999Therefore, we order, in accordance with In re J.R.; P.R. v. Florida, Department of Children & Families, 745 So.2d 1059 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), that the juvenile court conduct an expedited hearing to determine V.P.'s suitability under the statute. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Lerro v. DEPT. OF PROFESSIONAL REG.
green
1 sentence1991See, e.g., Barry v. Barchi, 443 U.S. 55 , 99 S.Ct. 2642 , 61 L.Ed.2d 365 (1979); Milton v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 542 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Aurora Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Business Regulation, 395 So.2d 604 ; Lerro v. Department of Professional Regulation, 388 So.2d 47 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Milton v. State, Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, Inc.
green
1 sentence1991See, e.g., Barry v. Barchi, 443 U.S. 55 , 99 S.Ct. 2642 , 61 L.Ed.2d 365 (1979); Milton v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 542 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Aurora Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Business Regulation, 395 So.2d 604 ; Lerro v. Department of Professional Regulation, 388 So.2d 47 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Aurora Enterprises, Inc. v. State, Department of Business Regulation, Division of Alcoholic Beverages & Tobacco
green
1 sentence1991See, e.g., Barry v. Barchi, 443 U.S. 55 , 99 S.Ct. 2642 , 61 L.Ed.2d 365 (1979); Milton v. Department of Health & Rehabilitative Services, 542 So.2d 1039 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989); Aurora Enterprises, Inc. v. Department of Business Regulation, 395 So.2d 604 ; Lerro v. Department of Professional Regulation, 388 So.2d 47 (Fla. 2d DCA 1980). | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.