employment contract violation (Idaho) · Go Syfert
← Idaho issues

employment contract violation in Idaho

12 Idaho opinions name it 2 courts 1989–2014 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Metcalf v. Intermountain Gas Co.green
idaho · 1989 · cited in 11 Idaho opinions naming this issue, 1990–2014
2 sentences

2014“Any action by either party which violates, nullifies or significantly impairs any benefit of the employment contract is a violation of the implied-in-law covenant.” Metcalf v. Intermountain Gas Co., 116 Idaho 622, 627 , 778 P.2d 744, 749 (1989).

2014“Any action by either party which violates, nullifies or significantly impairs any benefit of the employment contract is a violation of the implied-in-law covenant.” Metcalf v. Intermountain Gas Co., 116 Idaho 622, 627 , 778 P.2d 744, 749 (1989).

711

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital green
ariz · 1985
2 sentences

1994However, the covenant “ ‘does not create a duty for the employer to terminate the at-will employee only for good cause.’ ” Id. (quoting Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital, 147 Ariz. 370 , 710 P.2d 1025 (1985)).

1994However, the covenant “ ‘does not create a duty for the employer to terminate the at-will employee only for good cause.’ ” Id. (quoting Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital, 147 Ariz. 370 , 710 P.2d 1025 (1985)).

21989–1994
Foley v. Interactive Data Corp. green
cal · 1988
2 sentences

1989Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital, 147 Ariz. 370 , 710 P.2d 1025 (Ariz. 1985); Foley v. Interactive Data Corp., 47 Cal.3d 654 , 254 Cal. Rptr. 211 , 765 P.2d 373 (1988).

1989Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial Hospital, 147 Ariz. 370 , 710 P.2d 1025 (Ariz. 1985); Foley v. Interactive Data Corp., 47 Cal.3d 654 , 254 Cal. Rptr. 211 , 765 P.2d 373 (1988).

11989–1989

Statutes the citing opinions construe

ID § Idaho Code § 12-120 (5) ID § Idaho Code § 6-801 (4) ID § Idaho Code § 6-802 (4) ID § Idaho Code § 6-803 (4) ID § Idaho Code § 6-805 (4) ID § Idaho Code § 6-806 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

ID 12 (1989–2014) PA 7 (2002–2022) CA 7 (1949–2021) CO 4 (1996–2026) NM 4 (1995–2016) NY 3 (1984–2022) CT 3 (1987–1999) KS 2 (1993–2020) FL 2 (1992–1993) TX 2 (2009–2009) VA 2 (1962–2006)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check