assets if the relevant factors (Illinois) · Go Syfert
← Illinois issues

assets if the relevant factors in Illinois

12 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2000–2024 7 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re Marriage of Henkegreen
illappct · 2000 · cited in 5 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2012–2023
2 sentences

2023However, “[a]n equal division of marital assets is not required, and one spouse may be awarded a larger share of the assets if the relevant factors warrant such a result.” Henke, 313 Ill.

2021An equitable division does not necessarily mean an equal division, and “one spouse may be awarded a larger share of the assets if the relevant factors warrant such a result.” In re Marriage of Henke, 313 Ill.

25
In Re Marriage of Vancuragreen
illappct · 2005 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
2 sentences

2024“A reviewing court applies the manifest weight of the evidence standard to the factual findings for each factor on which a trial court may base its property disposition, but it applies the abuse of discretion standard in reviewing the trial court’s final property disposition (and how the trial court considers those factors).” In re Marriage of Vancura, 356 Ill.

2024“A reviewing court applies the manifest weight of the evidence standard to the factual findings for each factor on which a trial court may base its property disposition, but it applies the abuse of discretion standard in reviewing the trial court’s final property disposition (and how the trial court considers those factors).” In re Marriage of Vancura, 356 Ill.

22
In Re Marriage of Jacksgreen
illappct · 1990 · cited in 2 Illinois opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000
2 sentences

2000In re Marriage of Jacks, 200 Ill.

2000In re Marriage of Jacks , 200 Ill.

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
In re Marriage of Romano green
illappct · 2012
2 sentences

2024“An equitable division does not necessarily mean an equal division, and one spouse may be awarded a larger share of the assets if the relevant factors warrant such a result.” In re Marriage of Romano, 2012 IL App (2d) 091339, ¶ 121 .

2024“An equitable division does not necessarily mean an equal division, and one spouse may be awarded a larger share of the assets if the relevant factors warrant such a result.” In re Marriage of Romano, 2012 IL App (2d) 091339, ¶ 121 .

42021–2024
In Re Marriage of Romano green
illappct · 2012
1 sentence

2023“An equitable division does not necessarily mean an equal division, and one spouse may be awarded a larger share of the assets if the relevant factors warrant such a result.” Id.

12023–2023

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IL § 750 ILCS 5/503 (11) IL § 750 ILCS 5/101 (5) IL § 750 ILCS 5/504 (4) IL § 750 ILCS 5/505 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check