Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1982–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Waldbillig Woodworking, Inc. v. King Arthur's North, Ltd.green2 sentences2000In either case, if the completion date is omitted, it is impossible for a third party to determine from the claim whether the four-month filing requirement was met, a requirement which we note "is a condition of liability itself and not just a limitation on the remedy." Waldbillig Woodworking, Inc. v. King Arthur's North, Ltd. , 104 Ill. 2000In either case, if the completion date is omitted, it is impossible for a third party to determine from the claim whether the four-month filing requirement was met, a requirement which we note “is a condition of liability itself and not just a limitation on the remedy.” Waldbillig Woodworking, Inc. v. King Arthur’s North, Ltd., 104 Ill. | 2 | 4 |
Schmidt v. Andersongreen2 sentences1983The purpose of the four-month filing requirement is to give third parties dealing with the property notice of the existence, nature and character of a lien and thus enable third parties to determine from the claim itself whether the lien is enforceable. ( Schmidt v. Anderson (1911), 253 Ill. 29 , 97 N.E. 291 ; First Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Connelly (1982), 107 Ill. 1983The purpose of the four-month filing requirement is to give third parties dealing with the property notice of the existence, nature and character of a lien and thus enable third parties to determine from the claim itself whether the lien is enforceable. ( Schmidt v. Anderson (1911), 253 Ill. 29 , 97 N.E. 291 ; First Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Connelly (1982), 107 Ill. | 2 | 4 |
National City Mortgage v. Bergmangreen1 sentence2025Without a completion date, a person examining the lien claim would not know whether the four- month filing requirement had been met.”) (emphasis in original) with National City Mortgage v. Bergman, 405 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Merchants Environmental Industries, Inc. v. SLT Realty Ltd. Partnership
green
2 sentences2010The First District reasoned that, "[w]ithout a completion date, a person examining the lien claim would not know whether the four-month filing requirement had been met." Merchants, 314 Ill. 2010The First District reasoned that, “[wlithout a completion date, a person examining the lien claim would not know whether the four-month filing requirement had been met.” Merchants, 314 Ill. | 4 | 2008–2010 |
First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Connelly
neutral
2 sentences1983The purpose of the four-month filing requirement is to give third parties dealing with the property notice of the existence, nature and character of a lien and thus enable third parties to determine from the claim itself whether the lien is enforceable. ( Schmidt v. Anderson (1911), 253 Ill. 29 , 97 N.E. 291 ; First Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Connelly (1982), 107 Ill. 1983(Schmidt v. Anderson (1911), 253 Ill. 29 , 97 N.E. 291 ; First Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Connelly (1982), 107 Ill. | 2 | 1983–1983 |
Mutschler Kitchens of Chicago, Inc. v. Wineman
green
1 sentence1982App. 3d 728, 733-34 .) The appellate court found the four-month filing requirement of section 7 inapplicable. 95 Ill. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.