Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2008–2025 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Detention of Swopegreen2 sentences2008“Simply stated,” the doctrine of invited error prohibits a party from complaining of an error on appeal “which that party induced the court to make or to which that party consented.” In re Detention of Swope, 213 Ill. 2d 210, 217 , 821 N.E.2d 283 (2004). 2008The doctrine of invited error prohibits a party from complaining of an error on appeal “which that party induced the court to make or to which that party consented.” In re Detention of Swope, 213 Ill. 2d 210, 217 , 821 N.E,2d 283, 287 (2004). | 7 | 11 |
Oldenstedt v. Marshall Erdman & Associates, Inc.green2 sentences2014“Furthermore, the doctrine of invited error prohibits a party from complaining of an error on appeal ‘ “which that party induced the court to make or to which that party consented.” ’ ” Id. (quoting Oldenstedt v. Marshall Erdman & Associates, Inc., 381 Ill. 2014"Furthermore, the doctrine of invited error prohibits a party from complaining of an error on appeal ' "which that party induced the court to make or to which that party consented." ' " Id. (quoting Oldenstedt v. Marshall Erdman & Associates, Inc., 381 Ill. | 3 | 3 |
Eaves v. Hyster Co.green2 sentences2008See also Eaves v. Hyster Co., 244 Ill. 2008See also Eaves v. Hyster Co., 244 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
People v. Cartergreen1 sentence2022People v. Carter, 208 Ill. 2d 309, 319 (2003). | 1 | 1 |
Bidani v. Lewisgreen2 sentences2009App. 3d 20, 31 , 889 N.E.2d 654 (2008) (the doctrine of invited error prohibits a party from taking one course of action at trial and then contending on appeal that the course was erroneous); Bidani v. Lewis, 285 Ill. 2009App. 3d 545, 550 , 675 N.E.2d 647 (1996) (“Judicial estoppel provides that a party who assumes a particular position in a legal proceeding is estopped from assuming a contrary position in a subsequent legal proceeding”); and In re Detention of Swope, 213 Ill. 2d 210, 217 , 821 N.E.2d 283 (2004) (the rule of invited error provides: “a party cannot complain of error which that party induced the court to make or to which that party consented”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pellico v. Mork
green
2 sentences2025In re Detention of Swope, 213 Ill. 2d 210, 217 (2004); Pellico v. Mork, 2018 IL App (2d) 170468, ¶ 20 . 2025In re Detention of Swope, 213 Ill. 2d 210, 217 (2004); Pellico v. Mork, 2018 IL App (2d) 170468, ¶ 20 . | 3 | 2022–2025 |
Schultz v. NORTHEAST ILL. REGIONAL COMMUTER RAILROAD CORP.
green
2 sentences2014“Furthermore, the doctrine of invited error prohibits a party from complaining of an error on appeal ‘ “which that party induced the court to make or to which that party consented.” ’ ” Id. (quoting Oldenstedt v. Marshall Erdman & Associates, Inc., 381 Ill. 2014"Furthermore, the doctrine of invited error prohibits a party from complaining of an error on appeal ' "which that party induced the court to make or to which that party consented." ' " Id. (quoting Oldenstedt v. Marshall Erdman & Associates, Inc., 381 Ill. | 2 | 2014–2014 |
People v. Radford
green
1 sentence2025People v. Radford, 2020 IL 123975, ¶ 25 . ¶ 31 The doctrine of invited error prohibits a party from requesting to proceed in one manner and then arguing on appeal that the requested action was error. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Torres v. Midwest Development Co.
green
1 sentence2009App. 3d 20, 31 , 889 N.E.2d 654 (2008) (the doctrine of invited error prohibits a party from taking one course of action at trial and then contending on appeal that the course was erroneous); Bidani v. Lewis, 285 Ill. | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.