Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1976–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Harris v. News-Sungreen2 sentences2000Harris v. News-Sun, 269 Ill. 2000Harris v. News- Sun , 269 Ill. | 2 | 6 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lykowski v. Bergman
green
2 sentences2000Lykowski v. Bergman, 299 Ill. 2000Lykowski v. Bergman , 299 Ill. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
In re Estate of Stewart
green
1 sentence2016The District’s Case ¶ 48 The District presented the following witnesses: Banbury (through video deposition), Dr. Martin Tobin (medical expert), and Dr. Stephen Hoffman (medical expert). -13- 2016 IL App (2d) 151117 ¶ 49 1. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Thompson v. Frank
green
1 sentence2014Thompson, 313 Ill. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Geick v. Kay
green
1 sentence1995Geick v. Kay (1992), 236 Ill. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Blair v. Walker
green
2 sentences1976However, in our opinion, Blair v. Walker (1976), 64 Ill. 2d 1 , 349 N.E.2d 385 , is governing and is dispositive of the issue of absolute privilege. 1976However, in our opinion, Blair v. Walker (1976), 64 Ill. 2d 1 , 349 N.E.2d 385 , is governing and is dispositive of the issue of absolute privilege. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.