Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Carter v. CHICAGO & ILL. MID. RY. CO.green2 sentences2025The court ruled, however, that in a case involving multiple - 14 - No. 1-23-2508 parties or claims, if a court has not made a Rule 304(a) finding, the dismissal of a claim is immediately appealable only if the court “clearly and unequivocally” states in its severance order “that the claim, counterclaim or the party has indeed been severed (in the narrow sense of that word) and that the severed claim, counterclaim or party shall proceed thereafter separate from the other claims, counterclaims or parties to the case.” (Emphasis in original.) Id. at 307-08 . 2015Co., 119 Ill. 2d 296, 308 (1988) (holding that severance might make orders in the severed claim appealable). | 5 | 10 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Santana v. Zipperstein
green
2 sentences2015Tsevis’s notice of appeal cites Santana v. Zipperstein, 142 Ill. 2015Tsevis’s notice of appeal cites Santana v. Zipperstein, 142 Ill. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Northtown Warehouse & Transportation Co. v. Transamerica Insurance
neutral
2 sentences1990(Northtown Warehouse & Transportation Co. v. Transamerica Insurance Co. (1986), 111 Ill. 2d 532 , 490 N.E.2d 1268 .) However, the supreme court has explained: “[T]he trial court, in its severance order, [must] clearly and unequivocally statef] that the claim, counterclaim or the party has indeed been severed (in the narrow sense of that word) and that the severed claim, counterclaim or party shall proceed thereafter separate from the other claims, counterclaims or parties to the case.” (Emphasis in original.) (Carter v. Chicago & Illinois Midland R.R. 1990(Northtown Warehouse & Transportation Co. v. Transamerica Insurance Co. (1986), 111 Ill. 2d 532 , 490 N.E.2d 1268 .) However, the supreme court has explained: “[T]he trial court, in its severance order, [must] clearly and unequivocally statef] that the claim, counterclaim or the party has indeed been severed (in the narrow sense of that word) and that the severed claim, counterclaim or party shall proceed thereafter separate from the other claims, counterclaims or parties to the case.” (Emphasis in original.) (Carter v. Chicago & Illinois Midland R.R. | 2 | 1987–1990 |
Salyers v. BD. OF GOVERNORS OF STATE COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES
green
2 sentences1987In Sadler v. County of Cook the court, when considering the issue of the appealability of severed claims under Supreme Court Rule 304(a) (107 Ill. 2d R. 304(a)), found that a severed claim or cause of action results in a separate trial for purposes of the Rule, rather than a separate action, as had been earlier determined in Salyers v. Board of Governors (1979), 69 Ill. 1987App. 3d 356, 358 , 387 N.E.2d 1129 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Spencer, White & Prentis Incorporated of Connecticut v. Pfizer Incorporated
green
1 sentence1986(Hebel v. Ebersole (7th Cir. 1976), 543 F.2d 14 , 17.) For example, in Spencer, White & Prentis Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. (2d Cir. 1974), 498 F.2d 358 , a contractor sued to recover an unpaid balance of $59,912.50 due on a construction agreement. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Hebel v. Ebersole
green
1 sentence1986(Hebel v. Ebersole (7th Cir. 1976), 543 F.2d 14 , 17.) For example, in Spencer, White & Prentis Inc. v. Pfizer Inc. (2d Cir. 1974), 498 F.2d 358 , a contractor sued to recover an unpaid balance of $59,912.50 due on a construction agreement. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.