Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Louisiana opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Brealygreen2 sentences2013See State v. Brealy, 2000-2758 (La.App. 4 Cir. 11/7/01) , 800 So.2d 1116 . 2002In Brealy this Court examined the reliability of the identification according to the test set out in Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct. 2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977), where the Supreme Court listed five points of consideration; they are as follows: (1) the opportunity of the witness to view the assailant at the time of the crime; (2) the witness’ degree of attention; (3) the accuracy of the witness’ prior description of the assailant; (4) the level of certainty demonstrated by the witness; and, (5) the length of time between the crime and the confrontation. 800 So.2d at 1121 . | 7 | 8 |
State v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2014State v. Jones, p. 7, 2010-0018 (La.App. 4 Cir. 11/10/10) , 51 So.3d 827, 832 . 2014State v. Jones, p. 7, 2010-0018 (La.App. 4 Cir. 11/10/10) , 51 So.3d 827, 832 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Manson v. Brathwaite
green
2 sentences2016In reviewing the fact finder’s determination, a reviewing court must examine the reliability of the identification according to the factors established in Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct. 2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977), which are: “1) the opportunity of the witness to view the assailant at the time of the crime; 2) the witness’ degree of attention; 3) the accuracy of the witness’ prior description of the assailant; 4) the level of certainty demonstrated by .the witness; and 5) the length of time between the crime and the confrontation.” Haynes, 2013-0323, pp. 8-9, 144 So.3d at 1088. 2016In reviewing the fact finder’s determination, a reviewing court must examine the reliability of the identification according to the factors established in Manson v. Brathwaite, 432 U.S. 98 , 97 S.Ct. 2243 , 53 L.Ed.2d 140 (1977), which are: “1) the opportunity of the witness to view the assailant at the time of the crime; 2) the witness’ degree of attention; 3) the accuracy of the witness’ prior description of the assailant; 4) the level of certainty demonstrated by .the witness; and 5) the length of time between the crime and the confrontation.” Haynes, 2013-0323, pp. 8-9, 144 So.3d at 1088. | 12 | 2002–2016 |
State v. Paul
green
1 sentence2013In support of this claim, the defendant cites State v. Paul, 11-252 (La.App. 4 Cir. 4/18/12) , 90 So.3d 1191 , writ denied, 12-1103 (La.11/2/12), 99 So.3d 662 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Paul
neutral
1 sentence2013In support of this claim, the defendant cites State v. Paul, 11-252 (La.App. 4 Cir. 4/18/12) , 90 So.3d 1191 , writ denied, 12-1103 (La.11/2/12), 99 So.3d 662 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.