12 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1973–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Aubreygreen1 sentence1996In State v. Aubrey, 609 So.2d 1183, 1187 (La.App. 3 Cir.1992), the court catalogued a series of reasons it deemed acceptable: Judy Semien, a single mother of one, indicated sexual casualness; Nolan White can not read and is a friend of the defendant's attorney's mother; Ronald Stelly has a ninth grade education and indicated that the defendants looked familiar; Christine Reed, a single twenty-four year old, is too young and seemed infatuated with the defendants; Marie Savoy seemed inattentive and uninterested in the proceedings; Gloria Robert had previously served on a rape case; Marvaer Richa | 1 | 1 |
In Re Ponchatalawa, Inc.green1 sentence1985See In Re Ponchatalawa, 428 So.2d 993 (La.App. 1st Cir.1983); and since the State did not reurge the exception at the appellate level for consideration by this Court, we cannot rule on same. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bernardgreen1 sentence1983See State v. Bernard, 326 So.2d 332 (La.1976). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Crochetgreen1 sentence1979In State v. Crochet, 354 So.2d 1288, 1292 (La. 1977), rehearing denied 1978, this court stated that "[t]he refusal to appoint available psychiatrists to a sanity commission would constitute an abuse of discretion, but in the absence of a showing that such a specialist was available for appointment there is no trial error." The record indicates that the defense made no motion that psychiatrists be appointed to the commission, no showing that such specialists were available, and no objection to the appointments made by the trial court. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cao v. Stalder
green
1 sentence2017Therefore, forfeiture of prospective or future good time is not authorized by the statute, and the imposition of such a penalty is excessive." [Emphasis in original.] Cao , 915 So.2d at 857 -58 . | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Taylor
green
1 sentence2017State v. Taylor, 04-346 (La.App. 5 Cir. 10/26/04) , 887 So.2d 589, 594 . ..In the instant case,, the record indicates that defense counsel only lodged an objection to the State’s, inquiry as to whether the prospective jurors could rely on witness testimony in the absence of DNA evidence. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Riggins
neutral
1 sentence2010Moreover, the fifth circuit stated that “[t]he mere suggestion that [the witness] may have provided the defendant with an alibi is insufficient to satisfy the requirement of that facts be offered to prove her presence at trial necessary to the defendant’s case.” Id. *475 In the current case, the record indicates that defense counsel subpoenaed the witness for the first scheduled trial in August 2008, and then again after the trial was continued at the State’s request to October 2008. | 1 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Green
green
1 sentence2002In State v. Green, 94-0887, p. 25 (La.5/22/95), 655 So.2d 272, 288 , this court held that a trial judge's demand that the challenged party justify the use of a peremptory strike is tantamount to a finding that the challenger has produced enough evidence to support an inference of discriminatory purpose. | 1 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Bennett
green
1 sentence1996In State v. Bennett, 591 So.2d 783 (La.App. 4th Cir.1991), this Court held that a bench conference was not sufficient to constitute a contemporaneous objection as required by La. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Cargille
neutral
1 sentence1992In State v. Cargille, 507 So.2d 1254 (La.App. 3 Cir.1987), writ denied, 512 So.2d 1175 (La.1987), the court held that La.C.Cr.P. *644 art. 718 was satisfied when the State gave access to all documents in the State's custody to defendant, Cargille. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Cargille
green
1 sentence1992In State v. Cargille, 507 So.2d 1254 (La.App. 3 Cir.1987), writ denied, 512 So.2d 1175 (La.1987), the court held that La.C.Cr.P. *644 art. 718 was satisfied when the State gave access to all documents in the State's custody to defendant, Cargille. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Bennett
green
1 sentence1982Lemmon. [1] Our review of the record indicates that defense counsel never asked this witness what the "vernacular" terms used by defendant were. [2] In State v. Bennett, supra , we cautioned trial courts not to base judgments regarding capacity to stand trial solely on conclusory opinions of experts unsupported by enumerated factors. [3] La.R.S. 15:451 provides: Before what purposes 1 [purports] to be a confession can be introduced in evidence, it must be affirmatively shown that it was free and voluntary, and not made under the influence of fear, duress, intimidation, menaces, threats, induce | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Chantlin v. Acadia Parish School Board
green
1 sentence1973Williams v. Kimbrough, D.C., 295 F.Supp. 578 ; Chantlin v. Acadia Parish School Board, La.App., 100 So.2d 908 . | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Williams v. Kimbrough
green
1 sentence1973Williams v. Kimbrough, D.C., 295 F.Supp. 578 ; Chantlin v. Acadia Parish School Board, La.App., 100 So.2d 908 . | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.