6 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Revellegreen2 sentences1999See Kilburn, 941 S.W.2d at 742-43 ; Davis, 934 S.W.2d at 334-35 ; Revelle, 809 S.W.2d at 448 (Mo.App.1991). 4 Moreover, the record indicates the hearing on the motion to modify began with the aforementioned colloquy in which juvenile and mother agreed to waive the right to counsel. 1999See Kilburn, 941 S.W.2d at 742-43 ; Davis, 934 S.W.2d at 334-35 ; Revelle, 809 S.W.2d at 448 (Mo.App.1991). [4] Moreover, the record indicates the hearing on the motion to modify began with the aforementioned colloquy in which juvenile and mother agreed to waive the right to counsel. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Kilburngreen2 sentences1999See Kilburn, 941 S.W.2d at 742-43 ; Davis, 934 S.W.2d at 334-35 ; Revelle, 809 S.W.2d at 448 (Mo.App.1991). 4 Moreover, the record indicates the hearing on the motion to modify began with the aforementioned colloquy in which juvenile and mother agreed to waive the right to counsel. 1999See Kilburn, 941 S.W.2d at 742-43 ; Davis, 934 S.W.2d at 334-35 ; Revelle, 809 S.W.2d at 448 (Mo.App.1991). [4] Moreover, the record indicates the hearing on the motion to modify began with the aforementioned colloquy in which juvenile and mother agreed to waive the right to counsel. | 2 | 2 |
State v. Maloneygreen1 sentence1969State v. Keeble, Mo., 399 S.W.2d 118, 120-121 [8, 9]; State v. Maloney, Mo., 434 S.W.2d 487, 496 [12], Judgment affirmed. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Keeblegreen1 sentence1969State v. Keeble, Mo., 399 S.W.2d 118, 120-121 [8, 9]; State v. Maloney, Mo., 434 S.W.2d 487, 496 [12], Judgment affirmed. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re DL
green
2 sentences2010D.J.M., 259 S.W.3d at 536 ; D.L., 999 S.W.2d at 294 . 2010D.J.M., 259 S.W.3d at 536 ; D.L., 999 S.W.2d at 294 . | 2 | 2010–2010 |
In Re DJM
green
2 sentences2010D.J.M., 259 S.W.3d at 536 ; D.L., 999 S.W.2d at 294 . 2010D.J.M., 259 S.W.3d at 536 ; D.L., 999 S.W.2d at 294 . | 2 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Davis
green
2 sentences1999See Kilburn, 941 S.W.2d at 742-43 ; Davis, 934 S.W.2d at 334-35 ; Revelle, 809 S.W.2d at 448 (Mo.App.1991). 4 Moreover, the record indicates the hearing on the motion to modify began with the aforementioned colloquy in which juvenile and mother agreed to waive the right to counsel. 1999See Kilburn, 941 S.W.2d at 742-43 ; Davis, 934 S.W.2d at 334-35 ; Revelle, 809 S.W.2d at 448 (Mo.App.1991). [4] Moreover, the record indicates the hearing on the motion to modify began with the aforementioned colloquy in which juvenile and mother agreed to waive the right to counsel. | 2 | 1999–1999 |
State v. Carter
green
1 sentence2014Carter, 415 S.W.3d at 691 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.