State shall specify exception (Louisiana) · Go Syfert
← Louisiana issues

State shall specify exception in Louisiana

12 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1975–2017 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Prieurred
la · 1973 · cited in 10 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1975–2017
2 sentences

1996No such notice is required as to evidence of offenses which are a part of the res gestae, or convictions used to impeach defendant's testimony. (2) In the written statement the State shall specify the exception to the general exclusionary rule upon which it relies for the admissibility of the evidence of other acts or offenses. (3) Prerequisite to the admissibility of the evidence is a showing by the State that the evidence of other crimes is not merely repetitive and cumulative, is not a subterfuge for depicting the defendant's bad character or his propensity for bad behavior, and that it ser

1995When the prosecution intends to introduce evidence of "other crimes," Prieur, 277 So.2d 126 , requires the State to furnish in writing to the defendant a statement of the acts or wrongful acts about which it intends to offer evidence and the State shall specify the exception to the general exclusionary rule on which it relies to offer evidence of other offenses.

110
State v. Leegreen
la · 1976 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
1 sentence

1994Under State v. Hatcher, 372 So.2d 1024 (La. 1979), in order for such evidence to be admissible: (1) [T]here must be clear and convincing evidence of the commission of the other crimes and the defendant's connection therewith; State v. Prieur, 277 So.2d 126 (La.1973); see also, State v. Gaines, 340 So.2d 1294, 1298 (La.1977) (concurring opinion); McCormick on Evidence, § 190, pp. 451-52 (2d ed. 1972); (2) the modus operandi employed by the defendant in both the charged and the uncharged offenses must be so peculiarly distinctive that one must logically say they are the work of the same person;

11
State v. Gainesgreen
la · 1977 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994
1 sentence

1994Under State v. Hatcher, 372 So.2d 1024 (La. 1979), in order for such evidence to be admissible: (1) [T]here must be clear and convincing evidence of the commission of the other crimes and the defendant's connection therewith; State v. Prieur, 277 So.2d 126 (La.1973); see also, State v. Gaines, 340 So.2d 1294, 1298 (La.1977) (concurring opinion); McCormick on Evidence, § 190, pp. 451-52 (2d ed. 1972); (2) the modus operandi employed by the defendant in both the charged and the uncharged offenses must be so peculiarly distinctive that one must logically say they are the work of the same person;

11
State v. Clarkgreen
la · 1976 · cited in 1 Louisiana opinions naming this issue, 1978–1978
1 sentence

1978State v. Banks, 307 So.2d 594 (La.1975); see State v. Clark, 338 So.2d 690 (La. 1976) (concurring opinion by Dennis, J.).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Miller green
la · 1998
1 sentence

2000State v. Miller, 718 So.2d 960 at 962 .

12000–2000
State v. Hatcher green
la · 1979
1 sentence

1994Under State v. Hatcher, 372 So.2d 1024 (La. 1979), in order for such evidence to be admissible: (1) [T]here must be clear and convincing evidence of the commission of the other crimes and the defendant's connection therewith; State v. Prieur, 277 So.2d 126 (La.1973); see also, State v. Gaines, 340 So.2d 1294, 1298 (La.1977) (concurring opinion); McCormick on Evidence, § 190, pp. 451-52 (2d ed. 1972); (2) the modus operandi employed by the defendant in both the charged and the uncharged offenses must be so peculiarly distinctive that one must logically say they are the work of the same person;

11994–1994
State v. Jackson green
la · 1977
1 sentence

1994Under State v. Hatcher, 372 So.2d 1024 (La. 1979), in order for such evidence to be admissible: (1) [T]here must be clear and convincing evidence of the commission of the other crimes and the defendant's connection therewith; State v. Prieur, 277 So.2d 126 (La.1973); see also, State v. Gaines, 340 So.2d 1294, 1298 (La.1977) (concurring opinion); McCormick on Evidence, § 190, pp. 451-52 (2d ed. 1972); (2) the modus operandi employed by the defendant in both the charged and the uncharged offenses must be so peculiarly distinctive that one must logically say they are the work of the same person;

11994–1994
State v. Banks green
la · 1975
1 sentence

1978State v. Banks, 307 So.2d 594 (La.1975); see State v. Clark, 338 So.2d 690 (La. 1976) (concurring opinion by Dennis, J.).

11978–1978

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check