Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1989–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Richard D. Davis v. State of Missourigreen1 sentence2017Davis v. State, 486 S.W.3d 898, 905-06 (Mo. banc 2016) (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)). | 1 | 1 |
Deck v. Stategreen1 sentence2006Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984); Deck v. State, 68 S.W.3d 418, 425 (Mo. banc 2002). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2006To establish ineffective assistance of counsel, Ms. Francis “must satisfy the Strickland two-prong test, showing (1) counsel failed to exercise the customary skill and diligence that a reasonably competent attorney would exercise under substantially similar circumstances, and (2) that [she] was thereby prejudiced.” Baldridge, 857 S.W.2d at 256 (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)). 2006To establish ineffective assistance of counsel, Ms. Francis “must satisfy the Strickland two-prong test, showing (1) counsel failed to exercise the customary skill and diligence that a reasonably competent attorney would exercise under substantially similar circumstances, and (2) that [she] was thereby prejudiced.” Baldridge, 857 S.W.2d at 256 (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)). | 11 | 1993–2017 |
State v. Baldridge
green
1 sentence2006To establish ineffective assistance of counsel, Ms. Francis “must satisfy the Strickland two-prong test, showing (1) counsel failed to exercise the customary skill and diligence that a reasonably competent attorney would exercise under substantially similar circumstances, and (2) that [she] was thereby prejudiced.” Baldridge, 857 S.W.2d at 256 (citing Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 2064 , 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984)). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Williamson v. State
green
1 sentence1989Motion courts and prosecuting attorneys addressing motions for post-conviction relief must be thorough, and not cut the Strickland two-prong analysis short with a mere recitation of the words, “trial strategy.” The motion court in movant’s case stated that allegations of ineffective assistance of trial counsel which relate to trial strategy are not cognizable under this rule, citing Williamson v. State, 628 S.W.2d 895 (Mo.App.1981), and Porter v. State, 682 S.W.2d 16 (Mo.App.1984). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Porter v. State
green
1 sentence1989Motion courts and prosecuting attorneys addressing motions for post-conviction relief must be thorough, and not cut the Strickland two-prong analysis short with a mere recitation of the words, “trial strategy.” The motion court in movant’s case stated that allegations of ineffective assistance of trial counsel which relate to trial strategy are not cognizable under this rule, citing Williamson v. State, 628 S.W.2d 895 (Mo.App.1981), and Porter v. State, 682 S.W.2d 16 (Mo.App.1984). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.