Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Carlisle v. Keithgreen2 sentences2026“Dismissal of a complaint is proper under the provisions of Rule 12(b)(6) of the North Carolina Rules of Civil Procedure . . . when some fact disclosed in the complaint necessarily defeats the plaintiff’s claim[,]” and the rule is “an appropriate method of determining whether the statutes of limitation bar plaintiff’s claims if the bar is disclosed in the complaint.” Carlisle, 169 N.C. 2021“A motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) is an appropriate method of determining whether the statutes of limitation bar plaintiff’s claims if the bar is disclosed in the Complaint.” Carlisle v. Keith, 169 N.C. | 4 | 6 |
Horton v. Carolina Medicorp, Inc.green2 sentences2012A motion to dismiss “is an appropriate method of determining whether the statutes of limitation bar plaintiff’s claims if the bar is disclosed in the complaint.” Id. (citing Horton v. Carolina Medicorp, 344 N.C. 133, 136 , 472 S.E.2d 778, 780 (1996)). {35} In considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, “‘the well-pleaded material allegations of the complaint are taken as admitted; but conclusions of law or unwarranted deductions of fact are not admitted.’” Pinewood Homes, Inc. v. Harris, 184 N.C. 2012A motion to dismiss “is an appropriate method of determining whether the statutes of limitation bar plaintiff’s claims if the bar is disclosed in the complaint.” Id. (citing Horton v. Carolina Medicorp, 344 N.C. 133, 136 , 472 S.E.2d 778, 780 (1996)). {35} In considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, “‘the well-pleaded material allegations of the complaint are taken as admitted; but conclusions of law or unwarranted deductions of fact are not admitted.’” Pinewood Homes, Inc. v. Harris, 184 N.C. | 4 | 5 |
Sutton v. Dukegreen2 sentences2012App. 597, 613 , 646 S.E.2d 826, 837 (2007) (quoting Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94, 98 , 176 S.E.2d 161, 163 (1970)). 2012App. 597, 613 , 646 S.E.2d 826, 837 (2007) (quoting Sutton v. Duke, 277 N.C. 94, 98 , 176 S.E.2d 161, 163 (1970)). | 2 | 2 |
Pinewood Homes, Inc. v. Harrisgreen2 sentences2012A motion to dismiss “is an appropriate method of determining whether the statutes of limitation bar plaintiff’s claims if the bar is disclosed in the complaint.” Id. (citing Horton v. Carolina Medicorp, 344 N.C. 133, 136 , 472 S.E.2d 778, 780 (1996)). {35} In considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, “‘the well-pleaded material allegations of the complaint are taken as admitted; but conclusions of law or unwarranted deductions of fact are not admitted.’” Pinewood Homes, Inc. v. Harris, 184 N.C. 2012A motion to dismiss “is an appropriate method of determining whether the statutes of limitation bar plaintiff’s claims if the bar is disclosed in the complaint.” Id. (citing Horton v. Carolina Medicorp, 344 N.C. 133, 136 , 472 S.E.2d 778, 780 (1996)). {19} When considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, “the well-pleaded material allegations of the complaint are taken as admitted; but conclusions of law or unwarranted deductions of fact are not admitted.” Pinewood Homes, Inc. v. Harris, 184 N.C. | 2 | 2 |
Marzec v. Nyegreen2 sentences2018App. 88 , 93, 690 S.E.2d 537 , 541 (2010) ("[A] motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) is an appropriate method of determining whether the statutes of limitation bar [a] plaintiff's claims if the bar is disclosed in the complaint." (citation and quotation marks omitted)). 2018App. 88, 93 , 690 S.E.2d 537, 541 (2010) (“[A] motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) is an appropriate method of determining whether the statutes of limitation bar [a] plaintiff’s claims if the bar is disclosed in the complaint.” (citation and quotation marks omitted)). -5- SPOOR V. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hooper v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences2012A motion to dismiss “is an appropriate method of determining whether the statutes of limitation bar plaintiff’s claims if the bar is disclosed in the complaint.” Id. (citing Horton v. Carolina Medicorp, 344 N.C. 133, 136 , 472 S.E.2d 778, 780 (1996)). {35} In considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, “‘the well-pleaded material allegations of the complaint are taken as admitted; but conclusions of law or unwarranted deductions of fact are not admitted.’” Pinewood Homes, Inc. v. Harris, 184 N.C. 2012A motion to dismiss “is an appropriate method of determining whether the statutes of limitation bar plaintiff’s claims if the bar is disclosed in the complaint.” Id. (citing Horton v. Carolina Medicorp, 344 N.C. 133, 136 , 472 S.E.2d 778, 780 (1996)). {19} When considering a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, “the well-pleaded material allegations of the complaint are taken as admitted; but conclusions of law or unwarranted deductions of fact are not admitted.” Pinewood Homes, Inc. v. Harris, 184 N.C. | 3 | 2010–2012 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.