application of the equitable doctrine (New Jersey) · Go Syfert
← New Jersey issues

application of the equitable doctrine in New Jersey

12 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 1950–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Flake v. Bennettgreen
iowa · 1968 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977
2 sentences

1977App. 2d 126 , 231 N.E. 2d 257, 258 (1967); Flake v. Bennett, 261 Iowa 1005 , 156 N.W. 2d 849, 854 (1968). [at 597-598] A canvass of the cases dealing with the application of the equitable doctrine of substantial compliance indicate the following considerations: (1) the lack of prejudice to the defending party; (2) a series of steps taken to comply *77 with the statute involved; (3) a general compliance with the purpose of the statute; (4) a reasonable notice of petitioner's claim, and (5) a reasonable explanation why there was not a strict compliance with the statute.

1977App. 2d 126 , 231 N.E. 2d 257, 258 (1967); Flake v. Bennett, 261 Iowa 1005 , 156 N.W. 2d 849, 854 (1968). [at 597-598] A canvass of the cases dealing with the application of the equitable doctrine of substantial compliance indicate the following considerations: (1) the lack of prejudice to the defending party; (2) a series of steps taken to comply *77 with the statute involved; (3) a general compliance with the purpose of the statute; (4) a reasonable notice of petitioner's claim, and (5) a reasonable explanation why there was not a strict compliance with the statute.

11
Giuliano v. BD. TR. FIREMEN'S PENSION FUNDgreen
illappct · 1967 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977
1 sentence

1977App. 2d 126 , 231 N.E. 2d 257, 258 (1967); Flake v. Bennett, 261 Iowa 1005 , 156 N.W. 2d 849, 854 (1968). [at 597-598] A canvass of the cases dealing with the application of the equitable doctrine of substantial compliance indicate the following considerations: (1) the lack of prejudice to the defending party; (2) a series of steps taken to comply *77 with the statute involved; (3) a general compliance with the purpose of the statute; (4) a reasonable notice of petitioner's claim, and (5) a reasonable explanation why there was not a strict compliance with the statute.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
Bernstein v. BD. OF TRUST. TEACHERS'PEN. & ANN. FUND green
njsuperctappdiv · 1977
2 sentences

2005In Bernstein[ v. Bd. of Trustees of Teachers' Pension and Annuity Fund , 151 N.J.Super. 71 , 376 A .2d 563 (1977)], supra, where the doctrine was invoked by the court in the pension context, its elements were set forth with specificity: A canvass of the cases dealing with the application of the equitable doctrine of substantial compliance indicate the following considerations: (1) the lack of *1048 prejudice to the defending party; (2) a series of steps taken to comply with the statute involved; (3) a general compliance with the purpose of the statute; (4) a reasonable notice of petitioner's c

2005In Bernstein[ v. Bd. of Trustees of Teachers' Pension and Annuity Fund , 151 N.J.Super. 71 , 376 A .2d 563 (1977)], supra, where the doctrine was invoked by the court in the pension context, its elements were set forth with specificity: A canvass of the cases dealing with the application of the equitable doctrine of substantial compliance indicate the following considerations: (1) the lack of *1048 prejudice to the defending party; (2) a series of steps taken to comply with the statute involved; (3) a general compliance with the purpose of the statute; (4) a reasonable notice of petitioner's c

42001–2005
Guglielmo v. Guglielmo green
njsuperctappdiv · 1992
2 sentences

2002Guglielmo v. Guglielmo, 253 N.J.Super. 531, 546 , 602 A.2d 741 (App.Div.1992).

2002Guglielmo v. Guglielmo, 253 N.J.Super. 531, 546 , 602 A.2d 741 (App.Div.1992).

22002–2002
Toys \R\" Us green
ohioctapp · 1997
2 sentences

2013In Toys “R” Us, Inc. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 300 N.J.Super. 163 , 692 A.2d 111 (App.Div.1997), Taxation audited and assessed taxpayer with sales taxes on labels, which it paid and did not appeal.

2013In Toys “R” Us, Inc. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 300 N.J.Super. 163 , 692 A.2d 111 (App.Div.1997), Taxation audited and assessed taxpayer with sales taxes on labels, which it paid and did not appeal.

12013–2013
Kazin v. Kazin green
nj · 1979
2 sentences

1992In Kasin v. Kasin, 81 N.J. 85 , 405 A. 2d 360 (1979), the Supreme Court stated: The equitable principle of estoppel has been applied broadly and in a wide variety of matrimonial cases.

1992In Kasin v. Kasin, 81 N.J. 85 , 405 A. 2d 360 (1979), the Supreme Court stated: The equitable principle of estoppel has been applied broadly and in a wide variety of matrimonial cases.

11992–1992
Faustin v. Lewis green
nj · 1981
2 sentences

1992The application of the equitable doctrine of estoppel has been left to the discretion of the trial courts Faustin v. Lewis, 85 N.J. 507 , 427 A. 2d 1105 (1981).

1992The application of the equitable doctrine of estoppel has been left to the discretion of the trial courts Faustin v. Lewis, 85 N.J. 507 , 427 A. 2d 1105 (1981).

11992–1992
Neiman v. Hurff green
nj · 1952
1 sentence

1963The Chief Justice stated that: "This doctrine is so consistent with the equitable principles that have obtained here for centuries that we have no hesitancy in applying it, and we find no merit at all in the defendant's argument that the decision below works a corruption of blood or a forfeiture of estate. * * *" ( 11 N.J., at p. 61 ) The question before us in the instant case concerning the wife's personal property is not a novel one in other jurisdictions.

11963–1963
Martindell v. Fiduciary Counsel, Inc. green
nj · 1943
1 sentence

1952And in Martindell v. Fiduciary Counsel, Inc., 133 N.J.

11952–1952
Downs v. Sooy neutral
njch · 1877
1 sentence

1950He cannot merely upon the assertion of the unenforceability of the mortgage debt, and upon that ground alone, secure affirmative relief." And at page 1393, the following: "In the application of the general rule that the statute of limitations may not be asserted as a ground for affirmative relief, in conjunction with the equitable maxim that `he who seeks equity must do equity,' the majority of courts, in the absence of a statute declaring a different rule, hold that a court of equity will not, at the suit of a mortgagor or his successor in interest, cancel a real-estate mortgage or other secu

11950–1950

Where else courts name it

PA 38 (1875–2025) CA 18 (1914–2014) NJ 12 (1950–2013) TX 12 (1920–2025) NY 12 (1891–2006) IL 9 (1878–1992) MO 8 (1907–1971) CO 4 (1986–2007) MD 4 (1874–2001) GA 4 (1941–2021) MT 4 (1934–1984) OH 4 (2006–2017) MI 4 (1978–2025) WI 3 (1898–1938) OR 3 (1980–1997) NC 3 (1928–2016) IA 2 (1898–1977) IN 2 (1866–1924) WV 2 (1914–1928) AR 2 (1914–1965) AL 2 (1926–1927) LA 2 (1962–1985)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check