12 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 1950–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Flake v. Bennettgreen2 sentences1977App. 2d 126 , 231 N.E. 2d 257, 258 (1967); Flake v. Bennett, 261 Iowa 1005 , 156 N.W. 2d 849, 854 (1968). [at 597-598] A canvass of the cases dealing with the application of the equitable doctrine of substantial compliance indicate the following considerations: (1) the lack of prejudice to the defending party; (2) a series of steps taken to comply *77 with the statute involved; (3) a general compliance with the purpose of the statute; (4) a reasonable notice of petitioner's claim, and (5) a reasonable explanation why there was not a strict compliance with the statute. 1977App. 2d 126 , 231 N.E. 2d 257, 258 (1967); Flake v. Bennett, 261 Iowa 1005 , 156 N.W. 2d 849, 854 (1968). [at 597-598] A canvass of the cases dealing with the application of the equitable doctrine of substantial compliance indicate the following considerations: (1) the lack of prejudice to the defending party; (2) a series of steps taken to comply *77 with the statute involved; (3) a general compliance with the purpose of the statute; (4) a reasonable notice of petitioner's claim, and (5) a reasonable explanation why there was not a strict compliance with the statute. | 1 | 1 |
Giuliano v. BD. TR. FIREMEN'S PENSION FUNDgreen1 sentence1977App. 2d 126 , 231 N.E. 2d 257, 258 (1967); Flake v. Bennett, 261 Iowa 1005 , 156 N.W. 2d 849, 854 (1968). [at 597-598] A canvass of the cases dealing with the application of the equitable doctrine of substantial compliance indicate the following considerations: (1) the lack of prejudice to the defending party; (2) a series of steps taken to comply *77 with the statute involved; (3) a general compliance with the purpose of the statute; (4) a reasonable notice of petitioner's claim, and (5) a reasonable explanation why there was not a strict compliance with the statute. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bernstein v. BD. OF TRUST. TEACHERS'PEN. & ANN. FUND
green
2 sentences2005In Bernstein[ v. Bd. of Trustees of Teachers' Pension and Annuity Fund , 151 N.J.Super. 71 , 376 A .2d 563 (1977)], supra, where the doctrine was invoked by the court in the pension context, its elements were set forth with specificity: A canvass of the cases dealing with the application of the equitable doctrine of substantial compliance indicate the following considerations: (1) the lack of *1048 prejudice to the defending party; (2) a series of steps taken to comply with the statute involved; (3) a general compliance with the purpose of the statute; (4) a reasonable notice of petitioner's c 2005In Bernstein[ v. Bd. of Trustees of Teachers' Pension and Annuity Fund , 151 N.J.Super. 71 , 376 A .2d 563 (1977)], supra, where the doctrine was invoked by the court in the pension context, its elements were set forth with specificity: A canvass of the cases dealing with the application of the equitable doctrine of substantial compliance indicate the following considerations: (1) the lack of *1048 prejudice to the defending party; (2) a series of steps taken to comply with the statute involved; (3) a general compliance with the purpose of the statute; (4) a reasonable notice of petitioner's c | 4 | 2001–2005 |
Guglielmo v. Guglielmo
green
2 sentences2002Guglielmo v. Guglielmo, 253 N.J.Super. 531, 546 , 602 A.2d 741 (App.Div.1992). 2002Guglielmo v. Guglielmo, 253 N.J.Super. 531, 546 , 602 A.2d 741 (App.Div.1992). | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Toys \R\" Us
green
2 sentences2013In Toys “R” Us, Inc. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 300 N.J.Super. 163 , 692 A.2d 111 (App.Div.1997), Taxation audited and assessed taxpayer with sales taxes on labels, which it paid and did not appeal. 2013In Toys “R” Us, Inc. v. Director, Div. of Taxation, 300 N.J.Super. 163 , 692 A.2d 111 (App.Div.1997), Taxation audited and assessed taxpayer with sales taxes on labels, which it paid and did not appeal. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Kazin v. Kazin
green
2 sentences1992In Kasin v. Kasin, 81 N.J. 85 , 405 A. 2d 360 (1979), the Supreme Court stated: The equitable principle of estoppel has been applied broadly and in a wide variety of matrimonial cases. 1992In Kasin v. Kasin, 81 N.J. 85 , 405 A. 2d 360 (1979), the Supreme Court stated: The equitable principle of estoppel has been applied broadly and in a wide variety of matrimonial cases. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Faustin v. Lewis
green
2 sentences1992The application of the equitable doctrine of estoppel has been left to the discretion of the trial courts Faustin v. Lewis, 85 N.J. 507 , 427 A. 2d 1105 (1981). 1992The application of the equitable doctrine of estoppel has been left to the discretion of the trial courts Faustin v. Lewis, 85 N.J. 507 , 427 A. 2d 1105 (1981). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Neiman v. Hurff
green
1 sentence1963The Chief Justice stated that: "This doctrine is so consistent with the equitable principles that have obtained here for centuries that we have no hesitancy in applying it, and we find no merit at all in the defendant's argument that the decision below works a corruption of blood or a forfeiture of estate. * * *" ( 11 N.J., at p. 61 ) The question before us in the instant case concerning the wife's personal property is not a novel one in other jurisdictions. | 1 | 1963–1963 |
Martindell v. Fiduciary Counsel, Inc.
green
1 sentence1952And in Martindell v. Fiduciary Counsel, Inc., 133 N.J. | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Downs v. Sooy
neutral
1 sentence1950He cannot merely upon the assertion of the unenforceability of the mortgage debt, and upon that ground alone, secure affirmative relief." And at page 1393, the following: "In the application of the general rule that the statute of limitations may not be asserted as a ground for affirmative relief, in conjunction with the equitable maxim that `he who seeks equity must do equity,' the majority of courts, in the absence of a statute declaring a different rule, hold that a court of equity will not, at the suit of a mortgagor or his successor in interest, cancel a real-estate mortgage or other secu | 1 | 1950–1950 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.