elementary and fundamental requirement in New Jersey

12 New Jersey opinions name it 3 courts 1971–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by New Jersey courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (7)

Case	Followed	Cited
O'CONNOR v. Abraham Altusgreen nj · 1975 · cited in 3 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1988–2020 2 sentences 1992In recognition of that concept our Supreme Court in O'Connor v. Abraham Altus, 67 N.J. 106, 126 , 335 A. 2d 545 (1975) stated: "An elementary and fundamental requirement of due process in any proceeding which is to be accorded finality is notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections." [quoting Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314 , 70 S.Ct. 652, 657 , 94 L.Ed. 865 , 873 (1950).] Where due process has been afforded a litigant, technical v 1992In recognition of that concept our Supreme Court in O'Connor v. Abraham Altus, 67 N.J. 106, 126 , 335 A. 2d 545 (1975) stated: "An elementary and fundamental requirement of due process in any proceeding which is to be accorded finality is notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections." [quoting Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314 , 70 S.Ct. 652, 657 , 94 L.Ed. 865 , 873 (1950).] Where due process has been afforded a litigant, technical v	2	3
Rosa v. Araujogreen njsuperctappdiv · 1992 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020 1 sentence 2020"An elementary and fundamental requirement of due process in any proceeding which is to be accorded finality is notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections." Rosa v. Araujo, 260 N.J.	1	1
Edward Hansen, Inc. v. Kearny Post Office Assocs.green njsuperctappdiv · 1979 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988 1 sentence 1988He stated for the Court: "An elementary and fundamental requirement of due process in any proceeding which is to be accorded finality is notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections." [ O'Connor v. Abraham Altus, 67 N.J. 106, 126 (1975); see also Edward Hansen, Inc. v. Kearny Post Office Assocs., 166 N.J.	1	1
Feuchtbaum v. Constantinigreen nj · 1971 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1975–1975 1 sentence 1975He stated for the Court: An elementary and fundamental requirement of due process in any proceeding which is to be accorded finality is notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections. *127 See Walker v. City of Hutchinson, 352 U.S. 112, 115-16 , 77 S.Ct. 200, 202 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 178, 182 (1956); Schroeder v. New York, 371 U.S. 208, 211-12 , 83 S.Ct. 279, 281-82 , 9 L.Ed. 2d 255, 258-59 (1962); Feuchtbaum v. Constantini, 59 N.J. 167, 175 (1971); Muntz v. Smaily, 118 N.	1	1
Walker v. City of Hutchinsongreen scotus · 1956 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1975–1975 2 sentences 1975He stated for the Court: An elementary and fundamental requirement of due process in any proceeding which is to be accorded finality is notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections. 127 See Walker v. City of Hutchinson, 352 U.S. 112, 115-16 , 77 S.Ct. 200, 202 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 178, 182 (1956); Schroeder v. New York, 371 U.S. 208, 211-12 , 83 S.Ct. 279, 281-82 , 9 L.Ed. 2d 255, 258-59 (1962); Feuchtbaum v. Constantini, 59 N.J. 167, 175 (1971); Muntz v. Smaily, 118 N. 1975He stated for the Court: An elementary and fundamental requirement of due process in any proceeding which is to be accorded finality is notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections. 127 See Walker v. City of Hutchinson, 352 U.S. 112, 115-16 , 77 S.Ct. 200, 202 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 178, 182 (1956); Schroeder v. New York, 371 U.S. 208, 211-12 , 83 S.Ct. 279, 281-82 , 9 L.Ed. 2d 255, 258-59 (1962); Feuchtbaum v. Constantini, 59 N.J. 167, 175 (1971); Muntz v. Smaily, 118 N.	1	1
Schroeder v. City of New Yorkgreen scotus · 1962 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1975–1975 2 sentences 1975He stated for the Court: An elementary and fundamental requirement of due process in any proceeding which is to be accorded finality is notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections. 127 See Walker v. City of Hutchinson, 352 U.S. 112, 115-16 , 77 S.Ct. 200, 202 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 178, 182 (1956); Schroeder v. New York, 371 U.S. 208, 211-12 , 83 S.Ct. 279, 281-82 , 9 L.Ed. 2d 255, 258-59 (1962); Feuchtbaum v. Constantini, 59 N.J. 167, 175 (1971); Muntz v. Smaily, 118 N. 1975He stated for the Court: An elementary and fundamental requirement of due process in any proceeding which is to be accorded finality is notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections. 127 See Walker v. City of Hutchinson, 352 U.S. 112, 115-16 , 77 S.Ct. 200, 202 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 178, 182 (1956); Schroeder v. New York, 371 U.S. 208, 211-12 , 83 S.Ct. 279, 281-82 , 9 L.Ed. 2d 255, 258-59 (1962); Feuchtbaum v. Constantini, 59 N.J. 167, 175 (1971); Muntz v. Smaily, 118 N.	1	1
Muntz v. Smailygreen njsuperctappdiv · 1972 · cited in 1 New Jersey opinions naming this issue, 1975–1975 1 sentence 1975He stated for the Court: An elementary and fundamental requirement of due process in any proceeding which is to be accorded finality is notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections. *127 See Walker v. City of Hutchinson, 352 U.S. 112, 115-16 , 77 S.Ct. 200, 202 , 1 L.Ed. 2d 178, 182 (1956); Schroeder v. New York, 371 U.S. 208, 211-12 , 83 S.Ct. 279, 281-82 , 9 L.Ed. 2d 255, 258-59 (1962); Feuchtbaum v. Constantini, 59 N.J. 167, 175 (1971); Muntz v. Smaily, 118 N.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New Jersey. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

Case	Cited	Years
Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. green scotus · 1950 2 sentences 2009The leading case in this area is Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Company, 339 U.S. 306 , 70 S.Ct. 652 , 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950), in which the United States Supreme Court stated: An elementary and fundamental requirement of due process in any proceeding which is to be accorded finality is notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections. 2009The leading case in this area is Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Company, 339 U.S. 306 , 70 S.Ct. 652 , 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950), in which the United States Supreme Court stated: An elementary and fundamental requirement of due process in any proceeding which is to be accorded finality is notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections.	9	1971–2009
Roller v. Holly green scotus · 1900 2 sentences 1996Milliken v Meyer, 311 US 457 [ 61 S.Ct. 339 , 85 L.Ed. 278 , 132 A.L.R. 1357 ]; Grannis v Ordean, 234 US 385 [ 34 S.Ct. 779 , 58 L.Ed. 1363 ]; Priest v Las Vegas, 232 US 604 [ 34 S.Ct. 443 , 58 L.Ed. 751 ]; Roller v Holly, 176 US 398 [ 20 S.Ct. 410 , 44 L.Ed. 520 ] ..." Id, at 314 [ 70 SCt at 657 ], 94 LEd at 873.... [A]s to the basic requirement of notice itself there can be no doubt, where, as here, the result of the judicial proceeding was permanently to deprive a legitimate parent of all that parenthood implies. 1996Milliken v Meyer, 311 US 457 [ 61 S.Ct. 339 , 85 L.Ed. 278 , 132 A.L.R. 1357 ]; Grannis v Ordean, 234 US 385 [ 34 S.Ct. 779 , 58 L.Ed. 1363 ]; Priest v Las Vegas, 232 US 604 [ 34 S.Ct. 443 , 58 L.Ed. 751 ]; Roller v Holly, 176 US 398 [ 20 S.Ct. 410 , 44 L.Ed. 520 ] ..." Id, at 314 [ 70 SCt at 657 ], 94 LEd at 873.... [A]s to the basic requirement of notice itself there can be no doubt, where, as here, the result of the judicial proceeding was permanently to deprive a legitimate parent of all that parenthood implies.	1	1996–1996
Priest v. Trustees of Town of Las Vegas green scotus · 1914 2 sentences 1996Milliken v Meyer, 311 US 457 [ 61 S.Ct. 339 , 85 L.Ed. 278 , 132 A.L.R. 1357 ]; Grannis v Ordean, 234 US 385 [ 34 S.Ct. 779 , 58 L.Ed. 1363 ]; Priest v Las Vegas, 232 US 604 [ 34 S.Ct. 443 , 58 L.Ed. 751 ]; Roller v Holly, 176 US 398 [ 20 S.Ct. 410 , 44 L.Ed. 520 ] ..." Id, at 314 [ 70 SCt at 657 ], 94 LEd at 873.... [A]s to the basic requirement of notice itself there can be no doubt, where, as here, the result of the judicial proceeding was permanently to deprive a legitimate parent of all that parenthood implies. 1996Milliken v Meyer, 311 US 457 [ 61 S.Ct. 339 , 85 L.Ed. 278 , 132 A.L.R. 1357 ]; Grannis v Ordean, 234 US 385 [ 34 S.Ct. 779 , 58 L.Ed. 1363 ]; Priest v Las Vegas, 232 US 604 [ 34 S.Ct. 443 , 58 L.Ed. 751 ]; Roller v Holly, 176 US 398 [ 20 S.Ct. 410 , 44 L.Ed. 520 ] ..." Id, at 314 [ 70 SCt at 657 ], 94 LEd at 873.... [A]s to the basic requirement of notice itself there can be no doubt, where, as here, the result of the judicial proceeding was permanently to deprive a legitimate parent of all that parenthood implies.	1	1996–1996
Grannis v. Ordean green scotus · 1914 2 sentences 1996Milliken v Meyer, 311 US 457 [ 61 S.Ct. 339 , 85 L.Ed. 278 , 132 A.L.R. 1357 ]; Grannis v Ordean, 234 US 385 [ 34 S.Ct. 779 , 58 L.Ed. 1363 ]; Priest v Las Vegas, 232 US 604 [ 34 S.Ct. 443 , 58 L.Ed. 751 ]; Roller v Holly, 176 US 398 [ 20 S.Ct. 410 , 44 L.Ed. 520 ] ..." Id, at 314 [ 70 SCt at 657 ], 94 LEd at 873.... [A]s to the basic requirement of notice itself there can be no doubt, where, as here, the result of the judicial proceeding was permanently to deprive a legitimate parent of all that parenthood implies. 1996Milliken v Meyer, 311 US 457 [ 61 S.Ct. 339 , 85 L.Ed. 278 , 132 A.L.R. 1357 ]; Grannis v Ordean, 234 US 385 [ 34 S.Ct. 779 , 58 L.Ed. 1363 ]; Priest v Las Vegas, 232 US 604 [ 34 S.Ct. 443 , 58 L.Ed. 751 ]; Roller v Holly, 176 US 398 [ 20 S.Ct. 410 , 44 L.Ed. 520 ] ..." Id, at 314 [ 70 SCt at 657 ], 94 LEd at 873.... [A]s to the basic requirement of notice itself there can be no doubt, where, as here, the result of the judicial proceeding was permanently to deprive a legitimate parent of all that parenthood implies.	1	1996–1996
Milliken v. Meyer green scotus · 1941 2 sentences 1996Milliken v Meyer, 311 US 457 [ 61 S.Ct. 339 , 85 L.Ed. 278 , 132 A.L.R. 1357 ]; Grannis v Ordean, 234 US 385 [ 34 S.Ct. 779 , 58 L.Ed. 1363 ]; Priest v Las Vegas, 232 US 604 [ 34 S.Ct. 443 , 58 L.Ed. 751 ]; Roller v Holly, 176 US 398 [ 20 S.Ct. 410 , 44 L.Ed. 520 ] ..." Id, at 314 [ 70 SCt at 657 ], 94 LEd at 873.... [A]s to the basic requirement of notice itself there can be no doubt, where, as here, the result of the judicial proceeding was permanently to deprive a legitimate parent of all that parenthood implies. 1996Milliken v Meyer, 311 US 457 [ 61 S.Ct. 339 , 85 L.Ed. 278 , 132 A.L.R. 1357 ]; Grannis v Ordean, 234 US 385 [ 34 S.Ct. 779 , 58 L.Ed. 1363 ]; Priest v Las Vegas, 232 US 604 [ 34 S.Ct. 443 , 58 L.Ed. 751 ]; Roller v Holly, 176 US 398 [ 20 S.Ct. 410 , 44 L.Ed. 520 ] ..." Id, at 314 [ 70 SCt at 657 ], 94 LEd at 873.... [A]s to the basic requirement of notice itself there can be no doubt, where, as here, the result of the judicial proceeding was permanently to deprive a legitimate parent of all that parenthood implies.	1	1996–1996

Where else courts name it

OH 72 (1980–2025) TX 50 (1965–2023) CA 42 (1953–2026) IN 36 (1894–2023) NY 32 (1966–2026) LA 24 (1968–2024) IL 23 (1899–2025) MI 22 (1951–2026) PA 19 (1973–2023) MO 19 (1972–2024) MD 16 (1969–2024) OK 15 (1975–2011) CT 15 (1984–2023) NC 13 (1951–2024) NH 12 (1978–2023) NJ 12 (1971–2020) FL 12 (1981–2024) VA 11 (1978–2016) AZ 10 (1967–2021) GA 10 (1974–2003) AL 10 (1904–2025) MA 10 (1988–2026) WA 9 (1978–2018) KS 8 (1978–2005) CO 8 (1994–2011) OR 8 (1953–2020) SD 7 (1991–2015) NM 7 (1995–2020) WI 6 (1981–2020) VT 6 (1997–2020) HI 6 (1923–2022) UT 6 (1983–2020) DC 6 (1975–2003) MS 5 (1984–2016) TN 5 (1976–2015) MN 5 (1956–2018) AR 4 (2002–2018) RI 4 (1963–2011) IA 4 (1974–2016) WV 4 (1990–2019) MT 3 (1926–2007) ND 3 (1986–2014) KY 3 (1988–2021) NV 3 (1977–1998) AK 3 (1984–1994) ME 3 (1998–2007) ID 2 (1958–1986) NE 2 (1984–1988) SC 2 (2001–2005) DE 2 (2018–2019)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check