10 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1904–2025 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.green2 sentences2025In Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314 (1950), the United States Supreme Court said: "An elementary and fundamental requirement of due process in any proceeding which is to be accorded finality is notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections." "[N]otice must be of such nature as reasonably to convey the required information ... and it must afford a reasonable time for those interested to make their appearance …." Id.; see also Pettiway 2017See also Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. , 339 U.S. 306 , 314, 70 S.Ct. 652 , 94 L.Ed. 865 (1950) ("An elementary and fundamental requirement of due process in any proceeding which is to be accorded finality is notice reasonably calculated, under all the circumstances, to apprise interested parties of the pendency of the action and afford them an opportunity to present their objections ." (emphasis added)). | 4 | 9 |
Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. State Ex Rel. Krasnergreen2 sentences1998Krasner, 247 Ala. 469, 471 , 25 So.2d 30, 32 (1945) (stating that due process requires that a party have adequate notice of a proceeding before that party can be bound by that proceeding). 1998Krasner, 247 Ala. 469, 471 , 25 So.2d 30, 32 (1945) (stating that due process requires that a party have adequate notice of a proceeding before that party can be bound by that proceeding). | 1 | 2 |
Taylor v. Huntsville City Board of Educationgreen1 sentence2025App. 2020); Taylor v. Huntsville City Bd. of Educ., 143 So. 3d 219, 228 (Ala. Civ. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Robinson v. Hanrahan
green
2 sentences2010“The Supreme Court cited Mullane, 339 U.S. 306 , 70 S.Ct. 652 , 94 L.Ed. 865 , and its rationale in Robinson v. Hanrahan, 409 U.S. 38 , 93 S.Ct. 30 , 34 L.Ed.2d 47 (1972). 2010“The Supreme Court cited Mullane, 339 U.S. 306 , 70 S.Ct. 652 , 94 L.Ed. 865 , and its rationale in Robinson v. Hanrahan, 409 U.S. 38 , 93 S.Ct. 30 , 34 L.Ed.2d 47 (1972). | 2 | 1994–2010 |
Inglis v. Freeman
neutral
1 sentence1904It is an elementary and fundamental rule that before a complainant is entitled to relief in a court of equity, he must have no plain and adequate remedy at law.— Code 1896, § 638; Inglis v. Freeman, 137 Ala. 298 ; 16 Am. & Eng. | 1 | 1904–1904 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.