Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Ohio opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re Alexander C.green2 sentences2018R.C. 2151.23(A)(1) legislatively overruling In re Kronjaeger, 166 Ohio St. 172 , Richland County, Case No. 18-CA-37 19 140 N.E.2d 773 (1957); In re Alexander C., 164 Ohio App.3d 540 , 2005–Ohio–6134, 843 N.E.2d 211 (6th Dist.); In re Rowland, 2d Dist. 2018R.C. 2151.23(A)(1) legislatively overruling In re Kronjaeger, 166 Ohio St. 172 , Richland County, Case No. 18-CA-37 19 140 N.E.2d 773 (1957); In re Alexander C., 164 Ohio App.3d 540 , 2005–Ohio–6134, 843 N.E.2d 211 (6th Dist.); In re Rowland, 2d Dist. | 2 | 7 |
In Re Simsgreen2 sentences2005R.C. 2151.23(A)(1), legislatively overruling In re Kronjaeger (1957), 166 Ohio St. 172 , 1 O.O.2d 459 , 140 N.E.2d 773 ; see, also, In re Sims (1983), 13 Ohio App.3d 37 , 13 OBR 40, 468 N.E.2d 111 ; In re Rowland (Feb. 9, 2001), 2d Dist. 2005R.C. 2151.23(A)(1), legislatively overruling In re Kronjaeger (1957), 166 Ohio St. 172 , 1 O.O.2d 459 , 140 N.E.2d 773 ; see, also, In re Sims (1983), 13 Ohio App.3d 37 , 13 OBR 40, 468 N.E.2d 111 ; In re Rowland (Feb. 9, 2001), 2d Dist. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re A.S.
green
1 sentence2022Summit No. 29472, 2020-Ohio-1356, ¶ 7 , citing see Juv.R. 22(A); Juv.R. 10; R.C. 2151.27(A). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
In Re S.H., Unpublished Decision (9-26-2005)
green
2 sentences2017Butler No. CA2005-01-007, 2005-Ohio-5047, ¶ 9 ; R.C. 2151.23(A)(1). {¶ 28} Mother argues that the determination as to whether a child is dependent must be made as of the date alleged in the complaint, and not as of the date of the adjudicatory hearing. 2017Butler No. CA2005-01-007, 2005-Ohio-5047, ¶ 9 ; R.C. 2151.23(A)(1). {¶ 28} Mother argues that the determination as to whether a child is dependent must be made as of the date alleged in the complaint, and not as of the date of the adjudicatory hearing. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
In re A.W.
green
1 sentence2017Summit No. 25601, 2011-Ohio-4490, ¶ 8 . {¶9} An adjudication of dependency must be supported by clear and convincing evidence, which requires “evidence that will produce in the mind of the trier of fact a firm belief or conviction as to the facts sought to be established.” In re A.W. at ¶ 9; see also Juv.R. 29(E)(4) and R.C. 2151.35(A)(1). {¶10} R.C. 2151.04(A) provides that a “dependent child” is any child “[w]ho is homeless or destitute or without adequate parental care, through no fault of the child’s parents, guardian, or custodian[.]” {¶11} Mother argues that CSB must prove that the child | 1 | 2017–2017 |
In Re Knotts
green
1 sentence2017Knotts, 109 Ohio App.3d 267 (1996). {¶12} In our review of the record herein, we find that although the trial court, in its January 9, 2017 permanent custody judgment entry regarding B.W. and M.W., refers to its finding that B.W. and M.W. were found to be abused and/or dependent, no such entry of adjudication exists as part of the record. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.