Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Pennsylvania opinions name it 2 courts 2016–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
S. Middaugh v. PennDOT, Bureau of Driver Licensinggreen2 sentences2019For example, this Court has affirmed decisions of the courts of common pleas which held that non-Departmental delays of 9 years, 7 years and 10 months, 2 years and 7 months, and 2 years and 4 months can be considered extraordinarily extended periods of time to meet Gingrich’s first factor, where the other Gingrich factors were also satisfied.[] Middaugh, 196 A.3d at 1083 (internal footnote omitted). 2019For example, this Court has affirmed decisions of the courts of common pleas which held that non-Departmental delays of 9 years, 7 years and 10 months, 2 years and 7 months, and 2 years and 4 months can be considered extraordinarily extended periods of time to meet Gingrich’s first factor, where the other Gingrich factors were also satisfied.[] Middaugh, 196 A.3d at 1083 (internal footnote omitted). | 4 | 6 |
R.T. Currie v. PennDOT, Bureau of Driver Licensinggreen2 sentences2017The Gingrich factors were also recently balanced in Currie v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 142 A.3d 186, 187 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2016), where the delay caused by a non-Penn-DOT entity was nearly three years. 2017The Gingrich factors were also recently balanced in Currie v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 142 A.3d 186, 187 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2016), where the delay caused by a non-Penn-DOT entity was nearly three years. | 3 | 3 |
Capizzi v. PennDOT, Bureau of Driver Licensinggreen2 sentences2017That said, however, we have concluded that there may be limited extraordinary circumstances where the suspension loses its public protection rationale and simply becomes an additional punitive measure resulting from the conviction, but imposed long after the fact. 134 A.3d at 534 . 7 Accord Orwig v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, (Pa. Cmwlth., No. 286 C.D. 2015, filed June 3, 2016) (unreported) (applying the Gingrich exception where ten years elapsed between the conviction and the clerk of court’s reporting of the conviction to the Department); see Eckenrode v. Depar 2017That said, however, we have concluded that there may be limited extraordinary circumstances where the suspension loses its public protection rationale and simply becomes an additional punitive measure resulting from the conviction, but imposed long after the fact. 134 A.3d at 534 . 7 Accord Orwig v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, (Pa. Cmwlth., No. 286 C.D. 2015, filed June 3, 2016) (unreported) (applying the Gingrich exception where ten years elapsed between the conviction and the clerk of court’s reporting of the conviction to the Department); see Eckenrode v. Depar | 2 | 4 |
Gingrich v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensinggreen2 sentences2021It was added to the Gingrich test by the panel in the present matter to serve “the need for consistency and certainty in Gingrich’s application,” id. at 1086 n.17, and to balance objectives relating to public safety with drivers’ due process rights. 2021It was added to the Gingrich test by the panel in the present matter to serve “the need for consistency and certainty in Gingrich’s application,” id. at 1086 n.17, and to balance objectives relating to public safety with drivers’ due process rights. | 1 | 4 |
Bingnear v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Boardgreen2 sentences2016Appeal Bd. (City of Chester), 960 A.2d 890, 896 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2008); see also Sch. 2016Appeal Bd. (City of Chester), 960 A.2d 890, 896 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2008); see also Sch. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Gifford v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
green
2 sentences2019As explained by the Court in DeGrossi v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing , 174 A.3d 1187 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2017), a statement in an unreported opinion of this Court that Pokoy "remains good law" may have led to some confusion as to the applicability of Pokoy in light of Gingrich . 4 The Court in DeGrossi went on to discuss our decision in Gifford v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing , 172 A.3d 727 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2017), appeal dismissed as moot , --- Pa. ----, 201 A.3d 734 (2019), wherein we applied Gingrich and held that a clerk of court's delay in info 2019As explained by the Court in DeGrossi v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing , 174 A.3d 1187 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2017), a statement in an unreported opinion of this Court that Pokoy "remains good law" may have led to some confusion as to the applicability of Pokoy in light of Gingrich . 4 The Court in DeGrossi went on to discuss our decision in Gifford v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing , 172 A.3d 727 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2017), appeal dismissed as moot , --- Pa. ----, 201 A.3d 734 (2019), wherein we applied Gingrich and held that a clerk of court's delay in info | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Commonwealth v. Gifford
neutral
2 sentences2019As explained by the Court in DeGrossi v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing , 174 A.3d 1187 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2017), a statement in an unreported opinion of this Court that Pokoy "remains good law" may have led to some confusion as to the applicability of Pokoy in light of Gingrich . 4 The Court in DeGrossi went on to discuss our decision in Gifford v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing , 172 A.3d 727 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2017), appeal dismissed as moot , --- Pa. ----, 201 A.3d 734 (2019), wherein we applied Gingrich and held that a clerk of court's delay in info 2019As explained by the Court in DeGrossi v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing , 174 A.3d 1187 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2017), a statement in an unreported opinion of this Court that Pokoy "remains good law" may have led to some confusion as to the applicability of Pokoy in light of Gingrich . 4 The Court in DeGrossi went on to discuss our decision in Gifford v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing , 172 A.3d 727 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2017), appeal dismissed as moot , --- Pa. ----, 201 A.3d 734 (2019), wherein we applied Gingrich and held that a clerk of court's delay in info | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Negovan v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
green
2 sentences2019On appeal to this Court, the Department argued that the trial court 4 “Our standard of review in a license suspension case is to determine whether the factual findings of the trial court are supported by competent evidence and whether the trial court committed an error of law or an abuse of discretion.” Negovan v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 172 A.3d 733 , 735 n.4 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2017) (quoting Gammer v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 995 A.2d 380 , 383 n.3 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2010)). 5 erred because Gingrich required a delay of approximately 10 y 2019On appeal to this Court, the Department argued that the trial court 4 “Our standard of review in a license suspension case is to determine whether the factual findings of the trial court are supported by competent evidence and whether the trial court committed an error of law or an abuse of discretion.” Negovan v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 172 A.3d 733 , 735 n.4 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2017) (quoting Gammer v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 995 A.2d 380 , 383 n.3 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2010)). 5 erred because Gingrich required a delay of approximately 10 y | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Gammer v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
green
2 sentences2019On appeal to this Court, the Department argued that the trial court 4 “Our standard of review in a license suspension case is to determine whether the factual findings of the trial court are supported by competent evidence and whether the trial court committed an error of law or an abuse of discretion.” Negovan v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 172 A.3d 733 , 735 n.4 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2017) (quoting Gammer v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 995 A.2d 380 , 383 n.3 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2010)). 5 erred because Gingrich required a delay of approximately 10 y 2019On appeal to this Court, the Department argued that the trial court 4 “Our standard of review in a license suspension case is to determine whether the factual findings of the trial court are supported by competent evidence and whether the trial court committed an error of law or an abuse of discretion.” Negovan v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 172 A.3d 733 , 735 n.4 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2017) (quoting Gammer v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 995 A.2d 380 , 383 n.3 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2010)). 5 erred because Gingrich required a delay of approximately 10 y | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Pokoy v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing
green
2 sentences2017However, in Pokoy v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 714 A.2d 1162 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998), this Court concluded that a four-year delay, again attributable to the clerk of courts, was insufficient to set aside the license suspension. 2017However, in Pokoy v. Department of Transportation, Bureau of Driver Licensing, 714 A.2d 1162 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998), this Court concluded that a four-year delay, again attributable to the clerk of courts, was insufficient to set aside the license suspension. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.