Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Pennsylvania opinions name it 1 courts 2015–2022 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Tiradogreen2 sentences2022See Devers, supra; Tirado, supra. Further, the court explained that prior to imposing sentence, it had reviewed the PSI report and reviewed the sentencing guidelines with counsel. 2021See Tirado, supra. Moreover, the record shows the parties agreed Appellant’s offense gravity score was fourteen and Appellant had a prior record score of two. | 8 | 9 |
Commonwealth v. Martsgreen1 sentence2022Although this Court has stated it is presumed a court will consider the information and mitigating factors in a PSI report when one is presented, see Commonwealth v. Marts, 889 A.2d 608, 615 (Pa. Super. 2005), there is no need to presume this here as the trial court stated in its 1925(a) opinion that it had considered the PSI report when resentencing Satterfield. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Fowlergreen1 sentence2020See Fowler, supra. Finally, even if Appellant had properly preserved her claim that the court did not place its rationale on the record before imposing a sentence outside the guideline range, she would not be entitled to relief. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Contegreen1 sentence2020See Conte, 198 A.3d at 1177 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||