Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 South Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Bixbygreen2 sentences2023See id. at 139, 708 S.E.2d at 777 ("On appeal of the denial of a directed verdict of acquittal, [the appellate court] must look at the evidence in the light most favorable to the State."); State v. Wilds, 355 S.C. 269, 276 , 584 S.E.2d 138, 142 (Ct. App. 2003) ("Express malice is when there is a deliberate intention to unlawfully take the life of another."); State v. Bixby, 388 S.C. 528, 554 , 698 S.E.2d 572, 586 (2010) ("It is an axiomatic principle of law that [self-]defense has not been established if any one element is disproven."). 1 2. 2023See id. at 139, 708 S.E.2d at 777 ("On appeal of the denial of a directed verdict of acquittal, [the appellate court] must look at the evidence in the light most favorable to the State."); State v. Wilds, 355 S.C. 269, 276 , 584 S.E.2d 138, 142 (Ct. App. 2003) ("Express malice is when there is a deliberate intention to unlawfully take the life of another."); State v. Bixby, 388 S.C. 528, 554 , 698 S.E.2d 572, 586 (2010) ("It is an axiomatic principle of law that [self-]defense has not been established if any one element is disproven."). 1 2. | 3 | 3 |
Talley v. South Carolina Higher Education Tuition Grants Committeegreen2 sentences2017Tuition Grants Comm., 289 S.C. 483, 487 , 347 S.E.2d 99, 101 (1986) ("It is an axiomatic rule of law that issues may not be raised for the first time on appeal."); Tupper v. Dorchester Cty., 326 S.C. 318 , 324 n.3, 487 S.E.2d 187 , 190 n.3 (1997) ("[An] appellant cannot bootstrap an issue for appeal by way of [another party's] objection."). 2017Tuition Grants Comm., 289 S.C. 483, 487 , 347 S.E.2d 99, 101 (1986) ("It is an axiomatic rule of law that issues may not be raised for the first time on appeal."); Tupper v. Dorchester Cty., 326 S.C. 318 , 324 n.3, 487 S.E.2d 187 , 190 n.3 (1997) ("[An] appellant cannot bootstrap an issue for appeal by way of [another party's] objection."). | 3 | 3 |
All Saints Parish Waccamaw v. Protestant Episcopal Church in Diocesegreen2 sentences2017“It is an axiomatic principle of law that a person or entity must hold title to property in order to declare that it is held in trust for the benefit of another or transfer legal title to one person for the benefit of another.” All Saints, 385 S.C. at 449 , 685 S.E.2d at 174 . 2017“It is an axiomatic principle of law that a person or entity must hold title to property in order to declare that it is held in trust for the benefit of another or transfer legal title to one person for the benefit of another.” All Saints, 385 S.C. at 449 , 685 S.E.2d at 174 . | 2 | 3 |
American Hardware Supply Co., Inc. v. Whitmiregreen2 sentences2015Hardware Supply Co. v. Whitmire, 278 S.C. 607, 609 , 300 S.E.2d 289, 290 (1983))). 2015Hardware Supply Co. v. Whitmire, 278 S.C. 607, 609 , 300 S.E.2d 289, 290 (1983))). | 2 | 3 |
Eaddy v. Smurfit-Stone Container Corp.green2 sentences2015Hardware Supply Co. v. Whitmire, 278 S.C. 607, 609 , 300 S.E.2d 289, 290 (1983))); Eaddy v. Smurfit-Stone Container Corp., 355 S.C. 154, 164 , 584 S.E.2d 390, 396 (Ct.App.2003) (“[Sjhort, conclusory statements made without supporting authority are deemed abandoned on appeal and therefore not preserved for our review.” (citing Glasscock, Inc. v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. 2015Hardware Supply Co. v. Whitmire, 278 S.C. 607, 609 , 300 S.E.2d 289, 290 (1983))); Eaddy v. Smurfit-Stone Container Corp., 355 S.C. 154, 164 , 584 S.E.2d 390, 396 (Ct.App.2003) (“[Sjhort, conclusory statements made without supporting authority are deemed abandoned on appeal and therefore not preserved for our review.” (citing Glasscock, Inc. v. U.S. Fid. & Guar. | 1 | 2 |
State v. Wildsgreen2 sentences2023See id. at 139, 708 S.E.2d at 777 ("On appeal of the denial of a directed verdict of acquittal, [the appellate court] must look at the evidence in the light most favorable to the State."); State v. Wilds, 355 S.C. 269, 276 , 584 S.E.2d 138, 142 (Ct. App. 2003) ("Express malice is when there is a deliberate intention to unlawfully take the life of another."); State v. Bixby, 388 S.C. 528, 554 , 698 S.E.2d 572, 586 (2010) ("It is an axiomatic principle of law that [self-]defense has not been established if any one element is disproven."). 1 2. 2023See id. at 139, 708 S.E.2d at 777 ("On appeal of the denial of a directed verdict of acquittal, [the appellate court] must look at the evidence in the light most favorable to the State."); State v. Wilds, 355 S.C. 269, 276 , 584 S.E.2d 138, 142 (Ct. App. 2003) ("Express malice is when there is a deliberate intention to unlawfully take the life of another."); State v. Bixby, 388 S.C. 528, 554 , 698 S.E.2d 572, 586 (2010) ("It is an axiomatic principle of law that [self-]defense has not been established if any one element is disproven."). 1 2. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Mitchellgreen1 sentence2023See id. at 139, 708 S.E.2d at 777 ("On appeal of the denial of a directed verdict of acquittal, [the appellate court] must look at the evidence in the light most favorable to the State."); State v. Wilds, 355 S.C. 269, 276 , 584 S.E.2d 138, 142 (Ct. App. 2003) ("Express malice is when there is a deliberate intention to unlawfully take the life of another."); State v. Bixby, 388 S.C. 528, 554 , 698 S.E.2d 572, 586 (2010) ("It is an axiomatic principle of law that [self-]defense has not been established if any one element is disproven."). 1 2. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bostickgreen1 sentence2023See id. at 139, 708 S.E.2d at 777 ("On appeal of the denial of a directed verdict of acquittal, [the appellate court] must look at the evidence in the light most favorable to the State."); State v. Wilds, 355 S.C. 269, 276 , 584 S.E.2d 138, 142 (Ct. App. 2003) ("Express malice is when there is a deliberate intention to unlawfully take the life of another."); State v. Bixby, 388 S.C. 528, 554 , 698 S.E.2d 572, 586 (2010) ("It is an axiomatic principle of law that [self-]defense has not been established if any one element is disproven."). 1 2. | 1 | 1 |
Tupper v. Dorchester Countygreen2 sentences2017Tuition Grants Comm., 289 S.C. 483, 487 , 347 S.E.2d 99, 101 (1986) ("It is an axiomatic rule of law that issues may not be raised for the first time on appeal."); Tupper v. Dorchester Cty., 326 S.C. 318 , 324 n.3, 487 S.E.2d 187 , 190 n.3 (1997) ("[An] appellant cannot bootstrap an issue for appeal by way of [another party's] objection."). 2017Tuition Grants Comm., 289 S.C. 483, 487 , 347 S.E.2d 99, 101 (1986) ("It is an axiomatic rule of law that issues may not be raised for the first time on appeal."); Tupper v. Dorchester Cty., 326 S.C. 318 , 324 n.3, 487 S.E.2d 187 , 190 n.3 (1997) ("[An] appellant cannot bootstrap an issue for appeal by way of [another party's] objection."). | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Care & Treatment of Corleygreen2 sentences2017As to whether the magistrate should have continued the matter when Hamilton's attorney left the magistrate's court before commencement of the hearing: Talley, 289 S.C. at 487 , 347 S.E.2d at 101 ("It is an axiomatic rule of law that issues may not be raised for the first time on appeal."); In re Care and Treatment of Corley, 365 S.C. 252, 258 , 616 S.E.2d 441, 444 (Ct. App. 2005) ("Constitutional issues, like most others, must be raised to and ruled on by the trial court to be preserved for appeal."). 2017As to whether the magistrate should have continued the matter when Hamilton's attorney left the magistrate's court before commencement of the hearing: Talley, 289 S.C. at 487 , 347 S.E.2d at 101 ("It is an axiomatic rule of law that issues may not be raised for the first time on appeal."); In re Care and Treatment of Corley, 365 S.C. 252, 258 , 616 S.E.2d 441, 444 (Ct. App. 2005) ("Constitutional issues, like most others, must be raised to and ruled on by the trial court to be preserved for appeal."). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Carter v. State
green
2 sentences2006Carter v. State, 329 S.C. 355 , 495 S.E.2d 773 (1998); State v. Richburg, 304 S.C. 162 , 403 S.E.2d 315 (1991). 2006Carter v. State, 329 S.C. 355 , 495 S.E.2d 773 (1998); State v. Richburg, 304 S.C. 162 , 403 S.E.2d 315 (1991). | 2 | 2005–2006 |
State v. Richburg
green
2 sentences2006Carter v. State, 329 S.C. 355 , 495 S.E.2d 773 (1998); State v. Richburg, 304 S.C. 162 , 403 S.E.2d 315 (1991). 2006Carter v. State, 329 S.C. 355 , 495 S.E.2d 773 (1998); State v. Richburg, 304 S.C. 162 , 403 S.E.2d 315 (1991). | 2 | 2005–2006 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.