Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Tennessee opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Watts v. Civil Service Board for Columbiagreen2 sentences2024As succinctly stated in Watts v. Civil Service Bd. for Columbia, 606 S.W.2d 274 (Tenn. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 983 (1981): ln the trial court, under the common law writ, reversal or modification of the action of the Civil Service Board may be had only when the trial court finds that the Board has acted in violation of constitutional or statutory provisions or in excess of its own statutory authority; has followed unlawful procedure or been guilty of arbitrary or capricious action; or has acted without material evidence to support its decision. 2002Judicial review of the decision of a lower board or tribunal under the common law writ of certiorari “may be had only when the trial court finds that the Board has acted in violation of constitutional -4- or statutory provisions or in excess of its own statutory authority; has followed unlawful procedure or been guilty of arbitrary or capricious action; or has acted without material evidence to support its decision.” Watts. v. Civil Service Bd., 606 S.W.2d 274, 277 (Tenn. 1980). | 4 | 6 |
David Gross v. Sheriff A.C. Gillessgreen2 sentences2009Bd. for Columbia, 606 S.W.2d 274, 277 (Tenn.1980); Gross v. Gilless, 26 S.W.3d 488, 492 (Tenn.Ct.App.1999). 2005Bd. for Columbia, 606 S.W.2d 274, 277 (Tenn.1980); Gross v. Gilless, 26 S.W.3d 488, 492 (Tenn.Ct.App.1999). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Peoples Bank of Van Leer v. Bryan
green
2 sentences2014Hoover Motor Express Co., Inc. v. Railroad & Public Utilities Commission, 195 Tenn. 593 , 261 S.W.2d 233 (1953)[;] People’s Bank of Van Leer v. Bryan, 55 Tenn.App. 166 , 397 S.W.2d 400 [401 (1965)]; Bayside Warehouse Co. v. Memphis, 63 Tenn.App. 268 , 470 S.W.2d 375 [(1971)]; Brown v. Tenn. Real Estate Comm., Tenn.App.1972, 494 S.W.2d 506 [(1972)], cert. den. 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 54 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 [ (1973) ].” In the trial court, under the common law writ, reversal or modification of the action of the [ ] Board may be had only when the trial court finds that the Board has acted in violati 2012People's Bank of Van Leer v. Bryan, 55 Tenn.App. 166 , 397 S.W.2d 400 [401]; Bayside Warehouse Co. v. Memphis, 63 Tenn.App. 268 , 470 S.W.2d 375 ; Brown v. Tenn. Real Estate Comm., Tenn.App. 1972, 494 S.W.2d 506 , cert. den. 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 54 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 .” In the trial court, under the common law writ, reversal or modification of the action of the Civil Service Board may be had only when the trial court finds that the Board has acted in violation of constitutional or statutory provisions or in excess of its own statutory authority; has followed unlawful procedure or been guilty | 6 | 1980–2014 |
Brown v. Tennessee Real Estate Commission
green
2 sentences2014Hoover Motor Express Co., Inc. v. Railroad & Public Utilities Commission, 195 Tenn. 593 , 261 S.W.2d 233 (1953)[;] People’s Bank of Van Leer v. Bryan, 55 Tenn.App. 166 , 397 S.W.2d 400 [401 (1965)]; Bayside Warehouse Co. v. Memphis, 63 Tenn.App. 268 , 470 S.W.2d 375 [(1971)]; Brown v. Tenn. Real Estate Comm., Tenn.App.1972, 494 S.W.2d 506 [(1972)], cert. den. 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 54 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 [ (1973) ].” In the trial court, under the common law writ, reversal or modification of the action of the [ ] Board may be had only when the trial court finds that the Board has acted in violati 2012People's Bank of Van Leer v. Bryan, 55 Tenn.App. 166 , 397 S.W.2d 400 [401]; Bayside Warehouse Co. v. Memphis, 63 Tenn.App. 268 , 470 S.W.2d 375 ; Brown v. Tenn. Real Estate Comm., Tenn.App. 1972, 494 S.W.2d 506 , cert. den. 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 54 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 .” In the trial court, under the common law writ, reversal or modification of the action of the Civil Service Board may be had only when the trial court finds that the Board has acted in violation of constitutional or statutory provisions or in excess of its own statutory authority; has followed unlawful procedure or been guilty | 6 | 1980–2014 |
Bayside Warehouse Co. v. City of Memphis
green
2 sentences2014Hoover Motor Express Co., Inc. v. Railroad & Public Utilities Commission, 195 Tenn. 593 , 261 S.W.2d 233 (1953)[;] People’s Bank of Van Leer v. Bryan, 55 Tenn.App. 166 , 397 S.W.2d 400 [401 (1965)]; Bayside Warehouse Co. v. Memphis, 63 Tenn.App. 268 , 470 S.W.2d 375 [(1971)]; Brown v. Tenn. Real Estate Comm., Tenn.App.1972, 494 S.W.2d 506 [(1972)], cert. den. 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 54 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 [ (1973) ].” In the trial court, under the common law writ, reversal or modification of the action of the [ ] Board may be had only when the trial court finds that the Board has acted in violati 2014Hoover Motor Express Co., Inc. v. Railroad & Public Utilities Commission, 195 Tenn. 593 , 261 S.W.2d 233 (1953)[;] People’s Bank of Van Leer v. Bryan, 55 Tenn.App. 166 , 397 S.W.2d 400 [401 (1965)]; Bayside Warehouse Co. v. Memphis, 63 Tenn.App. 268 , 470 S.W.2d 375 [(1971)]; Brown v. Tenn. Real Estate Comm., Tenn.App.1972, 494 S.W.2d 506 [(1972)], cert. den. 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 54 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 [ (1973) ].” In the trial court, under the common law writ, reversal or modification of the action of the [ ] Board may be had only when the trial court finds that the Board has acted in violati | 6 | 1980–2014 |
Coca-Cola Co. v. Federal Trade Commission
green
2 sentences2014Hoover Motor Express Co., Inc. v. Railroad & Public Utilities Commission, 195 Tenn. 593 , 261 S.W.2d 233 (1953)[;] People’s Bank of Van Leer v. Bryan, 55 Tenn.App. 166 , 397 S.W.2d 400 [401 (1965)]; Bayside Warehouse Co. v. Memphis, 63 Tenn.App. 268 , 470 S.W.2d 375 [(1971)]; Brown v. Tenn. Real Estate Comm., Tenn.App.1972, 494 S.W.2d 506 [(1972)], cert. den. 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 54 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 [ (1973) ].” In the trial court, under the common law writ, reversal or modification of the action of the [ ] Board may be had only when the trial court finds that the Board has acted in violati 2012People's Bank of Van Leer v. Bryan, 55 Tenn.App. 166 , 397 S.W.2d 400 [401]; Bayside Warehouse Co. v. Memphis, 63 Tenn.App. 268 , 470 S.W.2d 375 ; Brown v. Tenn. Real Estate Comm., Tenn.App. 1972, 494 S.W.2d 506 , cert. den. 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 54 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 .” In the trial court, under the common law writ, reversal or modification of the action of the Civil Service Board may be had only when the trial court finds that the Board has acted in violation of constitutional or statutory provisions or in excess of its own statutory authority; has followed unlawful procedure or been guilty | 6 | 1980–2014 |
Olenz v. Marovitz
green
2 sentences2014Hoover Motor Express Co., Inc. v. Railroad & Public Utilities Commission, 195 Tenn. 593 , 261 S.W.2d 233 (1953)[;] People’s Bank of Van Leer v. Bryan, 55 Tenn.App. 166 , 397 S.W.2d 400 [401 (1965)]; Bayside Warehouse Co. v. Memphis, 63 Tenn.App. 268 , 470 S.W.2d 375 [(1971)]; Brown v. Tenn. Real Estate Comm., Tenn.App.1972, 494 S.W.2d 506 [(1972)], cert. den. 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 54 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 [ (1973) ].” In the trial court, under the common law writ, reversal or modification of the action of the [ ] Board may be had only when the trial court finds that the Board has acted in violati 2012People's Bank of Van Leer v. Bryan, 55 Tenn.App. 166 , 397 S.W.2d 400 [401]; Bayside Warehouse Co. v. Memphis, 63 Tenn.App. 268 , 470 S.W.2d 375 ; Brown v. Tenn. Real Estate Comm., Tenn.App. 1972, 494 S.W.2d 506 , cert. den. 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 54 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 .” In the trial court, under the common law writ, reversal or modification of the action of the Civil Service Board may be had only when the trial court finds that the Board has acted in violation of constitutional or statutory provisions or in excess of its own statutory authority; has followed unlawful procedure or been guilty | 6 | 1980–2014 |
Fitzgerald v. J. I. Case Threshing MacHine Co.
green
2 sentences2014Hoover Motor Express Co., Inc. v. Railroad & Public Utilities Commission, 195 Tenn. 593 , 261 S.W.2d 233 (1953)[;] People’s Bank of Van Leer v. Bryan, 55 Tenn.App. 166 , 397 S.W.2d 400 [401 (1965)]; Bayside Warehouse Co. v. Memphis, 63 Tenn.App. 268 , 470 S.W.2d 375 [(1971)]; Brown v. Tenn. Real Estate Comm., Tenn.App.1972, 494 S.W.2d 506 [(1972)], cert. den. 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 54 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 [ (1973) ].” In the trial court, under the common law writ, reversal or modification of the action of the [ ] Board may be had only when the trial court finds that the Board has acted in violati 2012People's Bank of Van Leer v. Bryan, 55 Tenn.App. 166 , 397 S.W.2d 400 [401]; Bayside Warehouse Co. v. Memphis, 63 Tenn.App. 268 , 470 S.W.2d 375 ; Brown v. Tenn. Real Estate Comm., Tenn.App. 1972, 494 S.W.2d 506 , cert. den. 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 54 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 .” In the trial court, under the common law writ, reversal or modification of the action of the Civil Service Board may be had only when the trial court finds that the Board has acted in violation of constitutional or statutory provisions or in excess of its own statutory authority; has followed unlawful procedure or been guilty | 6 | 1980–2014 |
General Portland Cement Co. v. United States
green
1 sentence2024As succinctly stated in Watts v. Civil Service Bd. for Columbia, 606 S.W.2d 274 (Tenn. 1980), cert. denied, 450 U.S. 983 (1981): ln the trial court, under the common law writ, reversal or modification of the action of the Civil Service Board may be had only when the trial court finds that the Board has acted in violation of constitutional or statutory provisions or in excess of its own statutory authority; has followed unlawful procedure or been guilty of arbitrary or capricious action; or has acted without material evidence to support its decision. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Hoover Motor Exp. Co. v. Railroad & Public Utilities Commission
green
2 sentences2014Hoover Motor Express Co., Inc. v. Railroad & Public Utilities Commission, 195 Tenn. 593 , 261 S.W.2d 233 (1953)[;] People’s Bank of Van Leer v. Bryan, 55 Tenn.App. 166 , 397 S.W.2d 400 [401 (1965)]; Bayside Warehouse Co. v. Memphis, 63 Tenn.App. 268 , 470 S.W.2d 375 [(1971)]; Brown v. Tenn. Real Estate Comm., Tenn.App.1972, 494 S.W.2d 506 [(1972)], cert. den. 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 54 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 [ (1973) ].” In the trial court, under the common law writ, reversal or modification of the action of the [ ] Board may be had only when the trial court finds that the Board has acted in violati 2014Hoover Motor Express Co., Inc. v. Railroad & Public Utilities Commission, 195 Tenn. 593 , 261 S.W.2d 233 (1953)[;] People’s Bank of Van Leer v. Bryan, 55 Tenn.App. 166 , 397 S.W.2d 400 [401 (1965)]; Bayside Warehouse Co. v. Memphis, 63 Tenn.App. 268 , 470 S.W.2d 375 [(1971)]; Brown v. Tenn. Real Estate Comm., Tenn.App.1972, 494 S.W.2d 506 [(1972)], cert. den. 414 U.S. 877 , 94 S.Ct. 54 , 38 L.Ed.2d 122 [ (1973) ].” In the trial court, under the common law writ, reversal or modification of the action of the [ ] Board may be had only when the trial court finds that the Board has acted in violati | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.