green
Positive treatment
8.3 score
Treatment trajectory · 1990 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
1990
2008
2026
Top citers, strongest first. 29 distinct citers.
How cited ↗
cited
Cited "see"
David L. Murtishaw v. Jeanne Woodford, Warden of the California State Prison at San Quentin
See People v. Murtishaw, 48 Cal.3d 1001 , 258 Cal.Rptr. 821 , 773 P.2d 172 (Cal.1989), cert denied, Murtishaw v. California, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3255 , 111 L.Ed.2d 764 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Dewberry v. State
(2×)
See Ransom v. State, 789 S.W.2d 572, 579 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3255 , 111 L.Ed.2d 765 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Theodore J. Lyons v. Clarice Stovall
See Sinistaj v. Burt, 66 F.3d 804 , 805 n.1 (6th Cir. 1995) (explaining that the state forfeited Teague because it did not raise the defense in the district court even though it later raised it in a motion to amend the district court's judgment). 2 In addition to the factors already mentioned, courts have treated the failure to raise a retroactivity defense as excusable neglect when Teague itself was new, see, e.g., Hopkinson v. Shillinger, 888 F.2d 1286, 1288-91 (10th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 (1990), or when the state reasonably believed that the petitioner did not seek the ben…
cited
Cited "see"
Moreno v. State
See Ransom v. State, 789 S.W.2d 572, 585 (Tex.Crim.App.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3255 , 111 L.Ed.2d 765 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Willie Ray Lampley, A/K/A Ray Lampley, and Cecilia Lampley Larry Wayne Crow and John Dare Baird, A/K/A J.D. Baird, United States of America v. Cecilia Lampley, and Willie Ray Lampley, A/K/A Ray Lampley Larry Wayne Crow and John Dare Baird, A/K/A J.D. Baird, United States of America v. John Dare Baird, A/K/A J.D. Baird
The Court noted that guards have become commonplace in most public places "so long as their numbers or weaponry do not suggest particular official concern or alarm." Id. at 569 , 106 S.Ct. at 1346 ; see Hopkinson v. Shillinger, 866 F.2d 1185, 1218 (10th Cir.1989) (security measures including armed and unarmed guards and magnetometer were not so inherently prejudicial as to pose unacceptable threat to defendant's right to fair trial), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3256 , 111 L.Ed.2d 765 (1990). 9 The facts of this case do not support a claim that the Holbrook standard was violated.
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Lampley
The Court noted that guards have become commonplace in most public places “so long as their numbers or weaponry do not suggest particular official concern or alarm.” Id. at 569 , 106 S.Ct. at 1346 ; see Hopkinson v. Shillinger, 866 F.2d 1185, 1218 (10th Cir.1989) (security measures including armed and unarmed guards and magnetometer were not so inherently prejudicial as to pose unacceptable threat to defendant’s right to fair trial), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3256 , 111 L.Ed.2d 765 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Fed. Carr. Cas. P 84,020 in Re Olympia Holding Corporation, Debtors. Lloyd T. Whitaker v. Frito-Lay, Inc., a Delaware Corporation
See In re Caravan Refrigerated Cargo, Inc., 864 F.2d 388, 390 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3254 , 111 L.Ed.2d 763 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Oken v. State
(2×)
Colvin, 314 Md. at 22 , 548 A.2d at 516 ; see Evans v. Thompson, 881 F.2d 117, 125 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3255 , 111 L.Ed.2d 764 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Lewis
See United States v. White, 890 F.2d 1012, 1015 (8th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Antoinette Natalie Lewis
See United States v. White, 890 F.2d 1012, 1015 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Steven M. Jacob v. Harold Clarke, Director, Nebraska Department of Corrections
Rose v. Duckworth, 769 F.2d 402, 405 (7th Cir.1985); accord Evans v. Thompson, 881 F.2d 117, 122 (4th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3255 , 111 L.Ed.2d 764 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
United States v. Henry
See United States v. Romero, 897 F.2d 47, 53 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3253 , 111 L.Ed.2d 762 (1990), and cert. denied, 498 U.S. 1092 , 111 S.Ct. 975 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1060 (1991); United States v. Leonard, 817 F.Supp. 286, 299 (E.D.N.Y.1992). 7 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Rafael Romero v. United States
See United States v. Romero, 897 F.2d 47 (2d Cir.) (affirming conviction on direct appeal), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3253 , 111 L.Ed.2d 762 (1990), 498 U.S. 1092 , 111 S.Ct. 975 , 112 L.Ed.2d 1060 (1991).
discussed
Cited "see"
Billy Gene Marshall v. Jack Cowley, and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
See Hopkinson v. Shillinger, 866 F.2d 1185, 1219 (10th Cir.), aff'd on reh'g, 888 F.2d 1286 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 (1990); Williams v. Missouri, 640 F.2d 140, 143-44 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 451 U.S. 990 (1981).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Michael R. Mabry, United States of America v. Calvin Cornelius Edwards, United States of America v. Mark Anthony Clearman, United States of America v. David L. Edwards
See United States v. White, 890 F.2d 1012, 1014 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3254 , 111 L.Ed.2d 763 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
United States v. Mabry
See United States v. White, 890 F.2d 1012, 1014 (8th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3254 , 111 L.Ed.2d 763 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
State v. Spurlock
(2×)
See State v. West, 767 S.W.2d 387, 395-396 (Tenn.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3254 , 111 L.Ed.2d 764 (1990); Montesi v. State, 220 Tenn. 354 , 417 S.W.2d 554 (1967); State v. McAlister, 751 S.W.2d 436, 439 (Tenn.Crim.App.1987).
discussed
Cited "see"
In the Matter of Steve D. Thompson Trucking, Inc., Debtor. (Two Cases). Billy R. Vining, Trustee v. Rock Wool Manufacturing Company, Billy R. Vining, Trustee v. Makita, U.S.A., Inc.
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Maislin, 497 U.S. at 130 , 110 S.Ct. at 2768 .
discussed
Cited "see"
Vining v. Rock Wool Manufacturing Co. (In re Thompson)
(2×)
also: Cited "see, e.g."
See Maislin, 497 U.S. at 130 , 110 S.Ct. at 2768 .
cited
Cited "see"
Keith Freisinger v. United States
See United States v. White, 890 F.2d 1012, 1014 (8th Cir. 1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Joanne Kotler, Individually and as Administratrix, Etc. v. The American Tobacco Company
See Moore v. Zant, 885 F.2d 1497, 1502-03 (11th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3255 , 111 L.Ed.2d 765 (1990); Hill v. Black, 920 F.2d 249, 250 (5th Cir.1990), modified on other grounds, 932 F.2d 369 (5th Cir.1991); but cf. Escalera, 852 F.2d at 47 (refusing to relax general rule in favor of habeas petitioner).
cited
Cited "see"
ROBERTS EXP. v. Expert Transp.
See In re Caravan Refrigerated Cargo, Inc., 864 F.2d 388, 391-92 (5th Cir.1989), cert, denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3254 , 111 L.Ed.2d 763 (1990).
cited
Cited "see"
Roberts Express, Inc. v. Expert Transportation, Inc.
See In re Caravan Refrigerated Cargo, Inc., 864 F.2d 388, 391-92 (5th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3254 , 111 L.Ed.2d 763 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see"
Commonwealth v. Munera
See Commonwealth v. Melendez, 407 Mass. 53, 55-56 (1990). 3 See also United States v. White, 890 F.2d 1012, 1014 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 (1990), and United States v. Cross, 928 F.2d 1030 , 1050 n.66 (11th Cir. 1991), cases asserting a distinction between criminal profile evidence and modus operand! evidence. 4 In United States v. Diaz, 878 F. 2d 608, 618 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 493 U.S. 993 (1989), the admission of testimony concerning the characteristics of a narcotics “stash pad” was held proper. 5 Q.
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Owens v. State
See e.g., Hopkinson v. Shillinger, 866 F.2d 1185, 1217 (10th Cir.1989), ce rt. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3256 , 111 L.Ed.2d 765 (1990), overruled on other grounds by Sawyer v. Smith, 497 U.S. 227 , 110 S.Ct. 2822 , 111 L.Ed.2d 193 (1990) (defendant must show specific errors, not solely based upon amount of time afforded to attorney to prepare defense) (citing United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 654 , *755 104 S.Ct. 2039, 2043 , 80 L.Ed.2d 657 (1984) and United States v. Pearson, 798 F.2d 385, 388 (10th Cir.1986)).
cited
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. James Norwood Hutching, Also Known as Norwood, Also Known as \Cowboy\""
See also Hopkinson v. Shillinger, 888 F.2d 1286, 1293 (10th Cir. 1989) (en banc), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3256 , 111 L.Ed.2d 765 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
United States v. George Don Galloway
See, e.g., Hopkinson v. Shillinger, 866 F.2d 1185 , 1203-04 n. 12 (10th Cir.), reh’g on other grounds, 888 F.2d 1286 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3256 , 111 L.Ed.2d 765 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
O.C. Chick Fero v. Dareld Kerby
See also Hopkinson v. Shillinger, 866 F.2d 1185, 1210 (10th Cir.1989) (the appropriate standard of review for a claim of prosecutorial misconduct on a writ of habeas corpus is the narrow one of due process, and not the broad exercise of supervisory power), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 , 110 S.Ct. 3256 , 111 L.Ed.2d 765 (1990).
discussed
Cited "see, e.g."
Leslie Wayne Smith v. Donald A. Dorsey, Warden, Snmcf Attorney General of the State of New Mexico
See Church, 942 F.2d at 1510 ; see, e.g., Hopkinson v. Shillinger, 866 F.2d 1185, 1205, 1211-12, 1217 (10th Cir.1989), cert. denied, 497 U.S. 1010 (1990). 14 The judgment of the United States District Court for the District of New Mexico is AFFIRMED. ** Honorable Richard D.
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
Frank
v.
United States
v.
United States
No. 89-7573.
Supreme Court of the United States.
Jun 25, 1990.
Published
C. A. 3d Cir. Cer-tiorari denied.