TTCA waives sovereign immunity (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

TTCA waives sovereign immunity in Texas

12 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

CaseFollowedCited
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Pettagreen
tex · 2001 · cited in 4 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2005–2019
2 sentences

2014The TTCA waives sovereign immunity for some torts, but not for claims “arising out of assault and battery, false imprisonment, or any other intentional tort.” Texas Dep’t of Public Safety v. Petta, 44 S.W.3d 575, 580 (Tex. 2001). 10 Neither party contests whether Norville was a Texas Tech employee at the time of the assault. 11 “Scope of employment” is defined by the TTCA as “the performance for a governmental unit of the duties of an employee’s office or employment and includes being in or about the performance of a task lawfully assigned to an employee by competent authority.” Section 101.00

2005Although the TTCA waives sovereign immunity for claims that an officer negligently carried out governmental policy, Texas Department of Public Safety v. Petta , 44 S.W.3d 575, 580 (Tex. 2001), the negligent implementation theory of liability does not itself waive immunity.

34
City of Brownsville v. Alvaradogreen
tex · 1995 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2012–2019
2 sentences

2019Petta, 44 S.W.3d at 580 (“We have also said . . . that the Tort Claims Act waives sovereign immunity from suit for claims that an officer negligently carried out governmental policy.”); City of Brownsville v. Alvarado, 897 S.W.2d 750, 754 (Tex. 1995); Nueces County v. Ferguson, 97 S.W.3d 205, 223 (Tex. App.— Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2002, no pet.) (“Since Ferguson did not assert any claim that 1 While discretionary policy decisions are exempt from TTCA waivers, decisions and actions at the operational level are not.

2012Petto, 44 S.W.3d at 580 ; see City of Brownsville v. Alvarado, 897 S.W.2d 750, 754 (Tex.1995).

22
Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Whitleygreen
tex · 2003 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2015–2015
2 sentences

2015Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Whitley, 104 S.W.3d 540, 542 (Tex. 2003).

2015Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Whitley, 104 S.W.3d 540, 542 (Tex. 2003); King, 329 S.W.3d at 879 .

22
Lowe v. Texas Tech Universitygreen
tex · 1976 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
2 sentences

2002Able, 35 S.W.3d at 611 ; Lowe v. Texas Tech Univ., 540 S.W.2d 297, 298 (Tex.1976).

2002Able , 35 S.W.3d at 611 ; Lowe v. Texas Tech Univ. , 540 S.W.2d 297, 298 (Tex. 1976).

22
John Sampson v. the University of Texas at Austingreen
tex · 2016 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020
1 sentence

2020The TTCA waives sovereign immunity in “three areas when the statutory requirements are met: (1) use of publicly owned automobiles; (2) injuries arising out of a condition or use of tangible personal property; and (3) premises defects.” Sampson v. Univ. of Tex. at Austin, 500 S.W.3d 380, 384 (Tex. 2016); TEX.CIV.PRAC. & REM.CODE ANN. §§ 101.021, 101.022.

11
Nueces County v. Fergusongreen
texapp · 2003 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019
1 sentence

2019Petta, 44 S.W.3d at 580 (“We have also said . . . that the Tort Claims Act waives sovereign immunity from suit for claims that an officer negligently carried out governmental policy.”); City of Brownsville v. Alvarado, 897 S.W.2d 750, 754 (Tex. 1995); Nueces County v. Ferguson, 97 S.W.3d 205, 223 (Tex. App.— Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2002, no pet.) (“Since Ferguson did not assert any claim that 1 While discretionary policy decisions are exempt from TTCA waivers, decisions and actions at the operational level are not.

11
Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority v. Pitonyakgreen
texapp · 2002 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005
1 sentence

2005Rivera , 146 S.W.3d at 338 ; Guadalupe-Blanco River Auth. v. Pitonyak , 84 S.W.3d 326, 342 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2002, no pet.).

11
State v. City of Bowling Greengreen
ohio · 1974 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2004–2004
1 sentence

2004See City of Bowling Green, 313 N.E.2d at 410, 411 (noting in "Syllabus by the Court" that appellant's challenge to which public-trust doctrine applied was raised "apart from any issue [of] sovereign immunity" and treating the two holdings separately in opinion). [6] Justice Keyes's dissenting opinion asserts that our holding "contravenes the plain language of the applicable statute, the TTCA...." The TTCA waives sovereign immunity from suit, but does not confer it.

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (5)

CaseCitedYears
Texas Department of Transportation v. Able green
tex · 2000
2 sentences

2002Able, 35 S.W.3d at 611 ; Lowe v. Texas Tech Univ., 540 S.W.2d 297, 298 (Tex.1976).

2002Able , 35 S.W.3d at 611 ; Lowe v. Texas Tech Univ. , 540 S.W.2d 297, 298 (Tex. 1976).

22002–2002
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center v. King green
texapp · 2011
1 sentence

2015Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Whitley, 104 S.W.3d 540, 542 (Tex. 2003); King, 329 S.W.3d at 879 .

12015–2015
Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda green
tex · 2004
1 sentence

2013Miranda, 133 S.W.3d at 225 ; see also TEX.

12013–2013
City of Garland v. Rivera green
texapp · 2004
1 sentence

2005Rivera , 146 S.W.3d at 338 ; Guadalupe-Blanco River Auth. v. Pitonyak , 84 S.W.3d 326, 342 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2002, no pet.).

12005–2005
Scott v. Prairie View a & M University green
texapp · 1999
1 sentence

2003Scott , 7 S.W.3d at 719 .

12003–2003

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check