12 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Texas Department of Public Safety v. Pettagreen2 sentences2014The TTCA waives sovereign immunity for some torts, but not for claims “arising out of assault and battery, false imprisonment, or any other intentional tort.” Texas Dep’t of Public Safety v. Petta, 44 S.W.3d 575, 580 (Tex. 2001). 10 Neither party contests whether Norville was a Texas Tech employee at the time of the assault. 11 “Scope of employment” is defined by the TTCA as “the performance for a governmental unit of the duties of an employee’s office or employment and includes being in or about the performance of a task lawfully assigned to an employee by competent authority.” Section 101.00 2005Although the TTCA waives sovereign immunity for claims that an officer negligently carried out governmental policy, Texas Department of Public Safety v. Petta , 44 S.W.3d 575, 580 (Tex. 2001), the negligent implementation theory of liability does not itself waive immunity. | 3 | 4 |
City of Brownsville v. Alvaradogreen2 sentences2019Petta, 44 S.W.3d at 580 (“We have also said . . . that the Tort Claims Act waives sovereign immunity from suit for claims that an officer negligently carried out governmental policy.”); City of Brownsville v. Alvarado, 897 S.W.2d 750, 754 (Tex. 1995); Nueces County v. Ferguson, 97 S.W.3d 205, 223 (Tex. App.— Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2002, no pet.) (“Since Ferguson did not assert any claim that 1 While discretionary policy decisions are exempt from TTCA waivers, decisions and actions at the operational level are not. 2012Petto, 44 S.W.3d at 580 ; see City of Brownsville v. Alvarado, 897 S.W.2d 750, 754 (Tex.1995). | 2 | 2 |
Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Whitleygreen2 sentences2015Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Whitley, 104 S.W.3d 540, 542 (Tex. 2003). 2015Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Whitley, 104 S.W.3d 540, 542 (Tex. 2003); King, 329 S.W.3d at 879 . | 2 | 2 |
Lowe v. Texas Tech Universitygreen2 sentences2002Able, 35 S.W.3d at 611 ; Lowe v. Texas Tech Univ., 540 S.W.2d 297, 298 (Tex.1976). 2002Able , 35 S.W.3d at 611 ; Lowe v. Texas Tech Univ. , 540 S.W.2d 297, 298 (Tex. 1976). | 2 | 2 |
John Sampson v. the University of Texas at Austingreen1 sentence2020The TTCA waives sovereign immunity in “three areas when the statutory requirements are met: (1) use of publicly owned automobiles; (2) injuries arising out of a condition or use of tangible personal property; and (3) premises defects.” Sampson v. Univ. of Tex. at Austin, 500 S.W.3d 380, 384 (Tex. 2016); TEX.CIV.PRAC. & REM.CODE ANN. §§ 101.021, 101.022. | 1 | 1 |
Nueces County v. Fergusongreen1 sentence2019Petta, 44 S.W.3d at 580 (“We have also said . . . that the Tort Claims Act waives sovereign immunity from suit for claims that an officer negligently carried out governmental policy.”); City of Brownsville v. Alvarado, 897 S.W.2d 750, 754 (Tex. 1995); Nueces County v. Ferguson, 97 S.W.3d 205, 223 (Tex. App.— Corpus Christi–Edinburg 2002, no pet.) (“Since Ferguson did not assert any claim that 1 While discretionary policy decisions are exempt from TTCA waivers, decisions and actions at the operational level are not. | 1 | 1 |
Guadalupe-Blanco River Authority v. Pitonyakgreen1 sentence2005Rivera , 146 S.W.3d at 338 ; Guadalupe-Blanco River Auth. v. Pitonyak , 84 S.W.3d 326, 342 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2002, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
State v. City of Bowling Greengreen1 sentence2004See City of Bowling Green, 313 N.E.2d at 410, 411 (noting in "Syllabus by the Court" that appellant's challenge to which public-trust doctrine applied was raised "apart from any issue [of] sovereign immunity" and treating the two holdings separately in opinion). [6] Justice Keyes's dissenting opinion asserts that our holding "contravenes the plain language of the applicable statute, the TTCA...." The TTCA waives sovereign immunity from suit, but does not confer it. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Texas Department of Transportation v. Able
green
2 sentences2002Able, 35 S.W.3d at 611 ; Lowe v. Texas Tech Univ., 540 S.W.2d 297, 298 (Tex.1976). 2002Able , 35 S.W.3d at 611 ; Lowe v. Texas Tech Univ. , 540 S.W.2d 297, 298 (Tex. 1976). | 2 | 2002–2002 |
University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center v. King
green
1 sentence2015Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Whitley, 104 S.W.3d 540, 542 (Tex. 2003); King, 329 S.W.3d at 879 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. Miranda
green
1 sentence2013Miranda, 133 S.W.3d at 225 ; see also TEX. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
City of Garland v. Rivera
green
1 sentence2005Rivera , 146 S.W.3d at 338 ; Guadalupe-Blanco River Auth. v. Pitonyak , 84 S.W.3d 326, 342 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2002, no pet.). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Scott v. Prairie View a & M University
green
1 sentence2003Scott , 7 S.W.3d at 719 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |