Department closed claim (Washington) · Go Syfert
← Washington issues

Department closed claim in Washington

12 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1956–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (16)

CaseCitedYears
Wilber v. Department of Labor & Industries green
wash · 1963
2 sentences

2016As the Industrial Insurance Act (MA)5 is remedial in nature, courts liberally construe it in favor of the worker.6 The MA permits an injured worker to reopen a claim upon showing that an aggravation of a disability occurred within seven years after the Department closed that claim.7 The aggravation need not be the result of the work injury but can be a worsening produced by daily life.8 Though not required by statute, some case law requires the worker to support a request to reopen with some objective medical evidence, verified by a physician, that the injury has worsened since the closure of

2016As the Industrial Insurance Act (MA)5 is remedial in nature, courts liberally construe it in favor of the worker.6 The MA permits an injured worker to reopen a claim upon showing that an aggravation of a disability occurred within seven years after the Department closed that claim.7 The aggravation need not be the result of the work injury but can be a worsening produced by daily life.8 Though not required by statute, some case law requires the worker to support a request to reopen with some objective medical evidence, verified by a physician, that the injury has worsened since the closure of

22016–2018
Clauson v. Department of Labor & Industries green
wash · 1996
2 sentences

2001Clauson, 130 Wash.2d at 583 , 925 P.2d 624 .

2001Clauson, 130 Wn.2d at 583 .

22001–2001
Davis v. Bendix Corp. green
washctapp · 1996
2 sentences

2000The Board affirmed the Department’s denial of LEP benefits relying on Davis v. Bendix Corp., 82 Wn.

2000The Board affirmed the Department's denial of LEP benefits relying on Davis v. Bendix Corp., 82 Wash.App. 267, 274 , 917 P.2d 586 , review denied, 130 Wash.2d 1004 , 925 P.2d 989 (1996) [3] and the doctrine of stare decisis.

22000–2000
Tollycraft Yachts Corp. v. McCoy green
wash · 1993
2 sentences

2016App. 439, 446 , 312 P.3d 676 (2013), review denied, 180 Wn.2d 1007 (2014). 8 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp. v. McCoy, 122 Wn.2d 426, 432 , 858 P.2d 503 (1993). 9 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp., 122 Wn.2d at 432 ; Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 446 . 10 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds v. Johnson, 55 Wn.2d 325, 327 , 347 P.2d 828 (1959)). 11 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds, 55 Wn.2d at 327 ). -7- NO. 75232-4-1 / 8 In Price v. Department of Labor & Industries,12 the Supreme Court eliminated the objective finding requirement for psychiatric disabilities.

2016App. 439, 446 , 312 P.3d 676 (2013), review denied, 180 Wn.2d 1007 (2014). 8 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp. v. McCoy, 122 Wn.2d 426, 432 , 858 P.2d 503 (1993). 9 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp., 122 Wn.2d at 432 ; Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 446 . 10 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds v. Johnson, 55 Wn.2d 325, 327 , 347 P.2d 828 (1959)). 11 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds, 55 Wn.2d at 327 ). -7- NO. 75232-4-1 / 8 In Price v. Department of Labor & Industries,12 the Supreme Court eliminated the objective finding requirement for psychiatric disabilities.

12016–2016
Hinds v. Johnson neutral
wash · 1959
2 sentences

2016App. 439, 446 , 312 P.3d 676 (2013), review denied, 180 Wn.2d 1007 (2014). 8 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp. v. McCoy, 122 Wn.2d 426, 432 , 858 P.2d 503 (1993). 9 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp., 122 Wn.2d at 432 ; Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 446 . 10 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds v. Johnson, 55 Wn.2d 325, 327 , 347 P.2d 828 (1959)). 11 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds, 55 Wn.2d at 327 ). -7- NO. 75232-4-1 / 8 In Price v. Department of Labor & Industries,12 the Supreme Court eliminated the objective finding requirement for psychiatric disabilities.

2016App. 439, 446 , 312 P.3d 676 (2013), review denied, 180 Wn.2d 1007 (2014). 8 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp. v. McCoy, 122 Wn.2d 426, 432 , 858 P.2d 503 (1993). 9 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp., 122 Wn.2d at 432 ; Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 446 . 10 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds v. Johnson, 55 Wn.2d 325, 327 , 347 P.2d 828 (1959)). 11 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds, 55 Wn.2d at 327 ). -7- NO. 75232-4-1 / 8 In Price v. Department of Labor & Industries,12 the Supreme Court eliminated the objective finding requirement for psychiatric disabilities.

12016–2016
Singletary v. Manor Healthcare Corp. green
washctapp · 2012
2 sentences

2016Singletarv, 166 Wn.

2016Two years later, the Department closed the claim "with time loss compensation as paid to January 24, 2004 but without a further award for time loss or permanent partial disability." Singletarv, 166 Wn.

12016–2016
Department of Labor & Industries v. Slaugh green
washctapp · 2013
2 sentences

2016As the Industrial Insurance Act (MA)5 is remedial in nature, courts liberally construe it in favor of the worker.6 The MA permits an injured worker to reopen a claim upon showing that an aggravation of a disability occurred within seven years after the Department closed that claim.7 The aggravation need not be the result of the work injury but can be a worsening produced by daily life.8 Though not required by statute, some case law requires the worker to support a request to reopen with some objective medical evidence, verified by a physician, that the injury has worsened since the closure of

2016App. 439, 446 , 312 P.3d 676 (2013), review denied, 180 Wn.2d 1007 (2014). 8 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp. v. McCoy, 122 Wn.2d 426, 432 , 858 P.2d 503 (1993). 9 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp., 122 Wn.2d at 432 ; Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 446 . 10 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds v. Johnson, 55 Wn.2d 325, 327 , 347 P.2d 828 (1959)). 11 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds, 55 Wn.2d at 327 ). -7- NO. 75232-4-1 / 8 In Price v. Department of Labor & Industries,12 the Supreme Court eliminated the objective finding requirement for psychiatric disabilities.

12016–2016
Energy Northwest v. Hartje green
washctapp · 2009
1 sentence

2014Hartje, 148 Wn.

12014–2014
Callihan v. Department of Labor & Industries green
washctapp · 1973
1 sentence

2012Callihan, 10 Wn.

12012–2012
Clauson v. Dept. of Labor and Industries green
wash · 1996
1 sentence

2001Clauson, 130 Wash.2d at 583 , 925 P.2d 624 .

12001–2001
Davis v. Bendix Corp. green
washctapp · 1996
1 sentence

2000The Board affirmed the Department's denial of LEP benefits relying on Davis v. Bendix Corp., 82 Wash.App. 267, 274 , 917 P.2d 586 , review denied, 130 Wash.2d 1004 , 925 P.2d 989 (1996) [3] and the doctrine of stare decisis.

12000–2000
Turner v. Department of Labor & Industries green
wash · 1953
2 sentences

1995In Turner v. Department of Labor & Indus., 41 Wn.2d 739 , 251 P.2d 883 (1953), we held that a worker who previously sustained an industrial injury and was working as a millwright in a saw mill when the Department closed his claim was not totally and permanently disabled.

1995In Turner v. Department of Labor & Indus., 41 Wn.2d 739 , 251 P.2d 883 (1953), we held that a worker who previously sustained an industrial injury and was working as a millwright in a saw mill when the Department closed his claim was not totally and permanently disabled.

11995–1995
Johnson v. Department of Labor & Industries neutral
wash · 1954
1 sentence

1956Moses v. Department of Labor & Industries, 44 Wn. (2d) 511, 268 P. (2d) 665 ; Johnson v. Department of Labor & Industries, 45 Wn. (2d) 71, 273 P. (2d) 510 .

11956–1956
Moses v. Department of Labor & Industries green
wash · 1954
1 sentence

1956Moses v. Department of Labor & Industries, 44 Wn. (2d) 511, 268 P. (2d) 665 ; Johnson v. Department of Labor & Industries, 45 Wn. (2d) 71, 273 P. (2d) 510 .

11956–1956
White v. Department of Labor & Industries green
wash · 1956
1 sentence

1956White v. Department of Labor & Industries, 48 Wn. (2d) 413, 293 P. (2d) 764 (1956); Clayton v. Department of Labor & Industries, 48 Wn. (2d) 754, 296 P. (2d) 676 (1956).

11956–1956
Clayton v. Department of Labor & Industries green
wash · 1956
1 sentence

1956White v. Department of Labor & Industries, 48 Wn. (2d) 413, 293 P. (2d) 764 (1956); Clayton v. Department of Labor & Industries, 48 Wn. (2d) 754, 296 P. (2d) 676 (1956).

11956–1956

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.32.160 (7) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.32.090 (5) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.04.010 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.08.160 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.12.010 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.32.060 (4) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.36.010 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.52.050 (3) WA § Wash. Rev. Code § 51.52.130 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check