Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1956–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Wilber v. Department of Labor & Industries
green
2 sentences2016As the Industrial Insurance Act (MA)5 is remedial in nature, courts liberally construe it in favor of the worker.6 The MA permits an injured worker to reopen a claim upon showing that an aggravation of a disability occurred within seven years after the Department closed that claim.7 The aggravation need not be the result of the work injury but can be a worsening produced by daily life.8 Though not required by statute, some case law requires the worker to support a request to reopen with some objective medical evidence, verified by a physician, that the injury has worsened since the closure of 2016As the Industrial Insurance Act (MA)5 is remedial in nature, courts liberally construe it in favor of the worker.6 The MA permits an injured worker to reopen a claim upon showing that an aggravation of a disability occurred within seven years after the Department closed that claim.7 The aggravation need not be the result of the work injury but can be a worsening produced by daily life.8 Though not required by statute, some case law requires the worker to support a request to reopen with some objective medical evidence, verified by a physician, that the injury has worsened since the closure of | 2 | 2016–2018 |
Clauson v. Department of Labor & Industries
green
2 sentences2001Clauson, 130 Wash.2d at 583 , 925 P.2d 624 . 2001Clauson, 130 Wn.2d at 583 . | 2 | 2001–2001 |
Davis v. Bendix Corp.
green
2 sentences2000The Board affirmed the Department’s denial of LEP benefits relying on Davis v. Bendix Corp., 82 Wn. 2000The Board affirmed the Department's denial of LEP benefits relying on Davis v. Bendix Corp., 82 Wash.App. 267, 274 , 917 P.2d 586 , review denied, 130 Wash.2d 1004 , 925 P.2d 989 (1996) [3] and the doctrine of stare decisis. | 2 | 2000–2000 |
Tollycraft Yachts Corp. v. McCoy
green
2 sentences2016App. 439, 446 , 312 P.3d 676 (2013), review denied, 180 Wn.2d 1007 (2014). 8 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp. v. McCoy, 122 Wn.2d 426, 432 , 858 P.2d 503 (1993). 9 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp., 122 Wn.2d at 432 ; Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 446 . 10 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds v. Johnson, 55 Wn.2d 325, 327 , 347 P.2d 828 (1959)). 11 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds, 55 Wn.2d at 327 ). -7- NO. 75232-4-1 / 8 In Price v. Department of Labor & Industries,12 the Supreme Court eliminated the objective finding requirement for psychiatric disabilities. 2016App. 439, 446 , 312 P.3d 676 (2013), review denied, 180 Wn.2d 1007 (2014). 8 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp. v. McCoy, 122 Wn.2d 426, 432 , 858 P.2d 503 (1993). 9 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp., 122 Wn.2d at 432 ; Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 446 . 10 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds v. Johnson, 55 Wn.2d 325, 327 , 347 P.2d 828 (1959)). 11 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds, 55 Wn.2d at 327 ). -7- NO. 75232-4-1 / 8 In Price v. Department of Labor & Industries,12 the Supreme Court eliminated the objective finding requirement for psychiatric disabilities. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Hinds v. Johnson
neutral
2 sentences2016App. 439, 446 , 312 P.3d 676 (2013), review denied, 180 Wn.2d 1007 (2014). 8 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp. v. McCoy, 122 Wn.2d 426, 432 , 858 P.2d 503 (1993). 9 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp., 122 Wn.2d at 432 ; Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 446 . 10 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds v. Johnson, 55 Wn.2d 325, 327 , 347 P.2d 828 (1959)). 11 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds, 55 Wn.2d at 327 ). -7- NO. 75232-4-1 / 8 In Price v. Department of Labor & Industries,12 the Supreme Court eliminated the objective finding requirement for psychiatric disabilities. 2016App. 439, 446 , 312 P.3d 676 (2013), review denied, 180 Wn.2d 1007 (2014). 8 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp. v. McCoy, 122 Wn.2d 426, 432 , 858 P.2d 503 (1993). 9 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp., 122 Wn.2d at 432 ; Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 446 . 10 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds v. Johnson, 55 Wn.2d 325, 327 , 347 P.2d 828 (1959)). 11 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds, 55 Wn.2d at 327 ). -7- NO. 75232-4-1 / 8 In Price v. Department of Labor & Industries,12 the Supreme Court eliminated the objective finding requirement for psychiatric disabilities. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Singletary v. Manor Healthcare Corp.
green
2 sentences2016Singletarv, 166 Wn. 2016Two years later, the Department closed the claim "with time loss compensation as paid to January 24, 2004 but without a further award for time loss or permanent partial disability." Singletarv, 166 Wn. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Department of Labor & Industries v. Slaugh
green
2 sentences2016As the Industrial Insurance Act (MA)5 is remedial in nature, courts liberally construe it in favor of the worker.6 The MA permits an injured worker to reopen a claim upon showing that an aggravation of a disability occurred within seven years after the Department closed that claim.7 The aggravation need not be the result of the work injury but can be a worsening produced by daily life.8 Though not required by statute, some case law requires the worker to support a request to reopen with some objective medical evidence, verified by a physician, that the injury has worsened since the closure of 2016App. 439, 446 , 312 P.3d 676 (2013), review denied, 180 Wn.2d 1007 (2014). 8 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp. v. McCoy, 122 Wn.2d 426, 432 , 858 P.2d 503 (1993). 9 Tollvcraft Yachts Corp., 122 Wn.2d at 432 ; Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 446 . 10 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds v. Johnson, 55 Wn.2d 325, 327 , 347 P.2d 828 (1959)). 11 Wilber, 61 Wn.2d at 445 (quoting Hinds, 55 Wn.2d at 327 ). -7- NO. 75232-4-1 / 8 In Price v. Department of Labor & Industries,12 the Supreme Court eliminated the objective finding requirement for psychiatric disabilities. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Energy Northwest v. Hartje
green
1 sentence2014Hartje, 148 Wn. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Callihan v. Department of Labor & Industries
green
1 sentence2012Callihan, 10 Wn. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Clauson v. Dept. of Labor and Industries
green
1 sentence2001Clauson, 130 Wash.2d at 583 , 925 P.2d 624 . | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Davis v. Bendix Corp.
green
1 sentence2000The Board affirmed the Department's denial of LEP benefits relying on Davis v. Bendix Corp., 82 Wash.App. 267, 274 , 917 P.2d 586 , review denied, 130 Wash.2d 1004 , 925 P.2d 989 (1996) [3] and the doctrine of stare decisis. | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Turner v. Department of Labor & Industries
green
2 sentences1995In Turner v. Department of Labor & Indus., 41 Wn.2d 739 , 251 P.2d 883 (1953), we held that a worker who previously sustained an industrial injury and was working as a millwright in a saw mill when the Department closed his claim was not totally and permanently disabled. 1995In Turner v. Department of Labor & Indus., 41 Wn.2d 739 , 251 P.2d 883 (1953), we held that a worker who previously sustained an industrial injury and was working as a millwright in a saw mill when the Department closed his claim was not totally and permanently disabled. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Johnson v. Department of Labor & Industries
neutral
1 sentence1956Moses v. Department of Labor & Industries, 44 Wn. (2d) 511, 268 P. (2d) 665 ; Johnson v. Department of Labor & Industries, 45 Wn. (2d) 71, 273 P. (2d) 510 . | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Moses v. Department of Labor & Industries
green
1 sentence1956Moses v. Department of Labor & Industries, 44 Wn. (2d) 511, 268 P. (2d) 665 ; Johnson v. Department of Labor & Industries, 45 Wn. (2d) 71, 273 P. (2d) 510 . | 1 | 1956–1956 |
White v. Department of Labor & Industries
green
1 sentence1956White v. Department of Labor & Industries, 48 Wn. (2d) 413, 293 P. (2d) 764 (1956); Clayton v. Department of Labor & Industries, 48 Wn. (2d) 754, 296 P. (2d) 676 (1956). | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Clayton v. Department of Labor & Industries
green
1 sentence1956White v. Department of Labor & Industries, 48 Wn. (2d) 413, 293 P. (2d) 764 (1956); Clayton v. Department of Labor & Industries, 48 Wn. (2d) 754, 296 P. (2d) 676 (1956). | 1 | 1956–1956 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.