Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 2006–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Tuttle v. Allstate Ins. Co.green2 sentences2024App. 120, 131 , 138 P.3d 1107 (2006) (“[I]f the evidence is conflicting as to whether the doctrine applies, the court should give the instruction.”). 2007Tuttle, 134 Wash.App. at 131 , 138 P.3d 1107 (citing Bell v. Wheeler, 14 Wash.App. 4, 6 , 538 P.2d 857 (1975)). ¶ 27 Ms. Kappelman claims the instruction was not appropriate here because Mr. Lutz created the emergency by his own negligence. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hughes
green
2 sentences2019State v. Hughes, 106 Wn.2d 176, 191 , 721 P.2d 902 (1986). 2019State v. Hughes, 106 Wn.2d 176, 191 , 721 P.2d 902 (1986). | 4 | 2018–2019 |
Bell v. Wheeler
neutral
2 sentences2007Tuttle, 134 Wash.App. at 131 , 138 P.3d 1107 (citing Bell v. Wheeler, 14 Wash.App. 4, 6 , 538 P.2d 857 (1975)). ¶ 27 Ms. Kappelman claims the instruction was not appropriate here because Mr. Lutz created the emergency by his own negligence. 2007Tuttle, 134 Wash.App. at 131 , 138 P.3d 1107 (citing Bell v. Wheeler, 14 Wash.App. 4, 6 , 538 P.2d 857 (1975)). ¶ 27 Ms. Kappelman claims the instruction was not appropriate here because Mr. Lutz created the emergency by his own negligence. | 3 | 2006–2007 |
Fergen v. Sestero
green
2 sentences2019Fergen, 182 Wn.2d at 803 . 2019Fercien, 182 Wn.2d at 808 . | 2 | 2019–2019 |
Tuttle v. Allstate Insurance
green
2 sentences2007Tuttle, 134 Wash.App. at 131 , 138 P.3d 1107 (citing Bell v. Wheeler, 14 Wash.App. 4, 6 , 538 P.2d 857 (1975)). ¶ 27 Ms. Kappelman claims the instruction was not appropriate here because Mr. Lutz created the emergency by his own negligence. 2007Tuttle, 134 Wn. | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Trudeau v. Sina Contracting Co. Inc.
green
2 sentences2024Notably, as recognized by our Supreme Court, this instruction does not alter the underlying standard of care: “‘[t]he so-called emergency rule is but a special application of the general standard of reasonable care.’” Sandberg, 46 Wn.2d at 783 (quoting Trudeau v. Sina Contracting Co., 241 Minn. 79, 84 , 62 N.W.2d 492 (1954) (citing W ILLIAM L. 2024Notably, as recognized by our Supreme Court, this instruction does not alter the underlying standard of care: “‘[t]he so-called emergency rule is but a special application of the general standard of reasonable care.’” Sandberg, 46 Wn.2d at 783 (quoting Trudeau v. Sina Contracting Co., 241 Minn. 79, 84 , 62 N.W.2d 492 (1954) (citing W ILLIAM L. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Sandberg v. Spoelstra
green
1 sentence2024Notably, as recognized by our Supreme Court, this instruction does not alter the underlying standard of care: “‘[t]he so-called emergency rule is but a special application of the general standard of reasonable care.’” Sandberg, 46 Wn.2d at 783 (quoting Trudeau v. Sina Contracting Co., 241 Minn. 79, 84 , 62 N.W.2d 492 (1954) (citing W ILLIAM L. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Redmond
green
1 sentence2020The court should give the instruction “when sufficient evidence is presented to support it.” Redmond, 150 Wn.2d at 493 . | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.