Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. McEnroegreen2 sentences2020See State v. McEnroe, 179 Wn.2d 32, 35 , 309 P.3d 428 (2013) (appellate court will avoid deciding constitutional questions where case may be fairly resolved on other grounds). 25 No. 79763-8-I/26 “Under the separation of powers doctrine, the fundamental function of each branch of government must remain inviolate, and one branch may not threaten the independence or integrity of another.” Afoa v. Dep’t of Labor & Indus., 3 Wn. 2020See State v. McEnroe, 179 Wn.2d 32, 35 , 309 P.3d 428 (2013) (appellate court will avoid deciding constitutional questions where case may be fairly resolved on other grounds). 25 No. 79763-8-I/26 Here, Starvish argues that the juvenile court had authority to direct the Department to assign a new social worker because of the communication breakdown between Starvish and Bolduan. | 2 | 2 |
York v. Wahkiakum School District No. 200green1 sentence2016Id. at 334 (J.M. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Parris
green
2 sentences2024In Parris, the defendant had violated “several of his probationary requirements: A urinalysis test revealed methamphetamine; he had failed to participate in a drug and alcohol treatment program; and he had failed to provide proof of work or legitimate income.” 163 Wn. 2018Id. at 113-14 . | 2 | 2018–2024 |
United States v. Lawrence Michael Duff
green
2 sentences2017For example, in United States v. Duff, 831 F.2d 176 (9th Cir. 1987), the Ninth Circuit noted that a urinalysis test of a probationer must be supported by reasonable suspicion. 6 Id. at 179 . 2017For example, in United States v. Duff, 831 F.2d 176 (9th Cir. 1987), the Ninth Circuit noted that a urinalysis test of a probationer must be supported by reasonable suspicion. 6 Id. at 179 . | 2 | 2017–2017 |
Robinson v. City of Seattle
green
2 sentences2008In Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash. App. 795, 818 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000), the Court of Appeals opined that "[i]t is difficult to imagine an affair more private than the passing of urine." The United States Supreme Court similarly observed in reference to urination, "`[m]ost people describe it by euphemisms if they talk about it at all. 2008In Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wn. | 2 | 2008–2008 |
O'Neill v. City of Shoreline
green
1 sentence2020App. 15, 21 , 332 P.3d 1099 (2014). 10 Because we conclude that the juvenile court abused its discretion in directing Starvish to submit to urinalysis, we do not address Starvish’s argument that the urinalysis requirement violated her rights under article I, section 7 of the Washington Constitution. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Cornwell
green
1 sentence2019Cornwell, 190 Wn.2d at 305 (citing Parris, 163 Wn. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Parramore
green
1 sentence2019App. 527, 531 , 768 P.2d 530 (1989) (reversing the sentencing condition of a urinalysis test because such a test was not directly related to the defendant’s conviction for the delivery of marijuana); see RCW 9.94A.030(10); RCW 9.94A.505(9). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
State v. Parris
neutral
1 sentence2018Id. at 113-14, 259 P.3d 331 . | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Robinson v. City of Seattle
green
1 sentence2008In Robinson v. City of Seattle, 102 Wash. App. 795, 818 , 10 P.3d 452 (2000), the Court of Appeals opined that "[i]t is difficult to imagine an affair more private than the passing of urine." The United States Supreme Court similarly observed in reference to urination, "`[m]ost people describe it by euphemisms if they talk about it at all. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Tradewell
green
1 sentence1974By introducing the opinion testimony of his physician, Rochelle “abandoned his right of medical privacy and waived the statutory physician-patient privilege as to any medical testimony which tends to contradict or impeach his medical evidence.” State v. Tradewell, 9 Wn. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.