Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
12 Wyoming opinions name it 1 courts 1996–2005 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wyoming courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corp. v. Langdongreen2 sentences2000Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation v. Langdon, 634 P.2d 509, 520 (Wyo.1981); Burns v. State ex rel. 2000Corp. v. Langdon, 634 P.2d 509, 520 (Wyo.1981). | 4 | 4 |
Corman v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Divisiongreen2 sentences2001When an abuse of discretion is the issue on review, the reviewing court examines the question of whether the agency's "decision was based on a consideration of relevant factors and whether it is rational." Matter of Corman, 909 P.2d 966, 971 (Wyo.1996). 2000When an abuse of discretion is the issue on review, the reviewing court examines the question of whether the agency's "decision was based on a consideration of relevant factors and whether it is rational." Matter of Corman, 909 P.2d 966, 971 (Wyo. 1996). | 3 | 4 |
Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass'n v. Environmental Quality Councilgreen2 sentences1997Tri-State Generation and Transmission Ass’n, Inc. v. Environmental Quality Council, 590 P.2d 1324, 1330 (Wyo.1979). 1996Knight v. Environmental Quality Council, 805 P.2d 268, 273 (Wyo.1991); Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass’n v. Environmental Quality Council, 590 P.2d 1324, 1327 (Wyo.1979). | 2 | 2 |
Taylor v. Wyoming Board of Medicinegreen1 sentence2003Taylor v. Wyoming Bd. of Medicine, 930 P.2d 973, 975 (Wyo.1997). | 1 | 1 |
Pederson v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Compensation Divisiongreen1 sentence2000Claim of Pederson, 939 P.2d 740, 742 (Wyo.1997). *803 DISCUSSION In applying the standards set out above, we search the findings and conclusions of the Hearing Examiner, as well as the record, to determine whether the agency's decision is based upon a consideration of relevant factors and is rational. | 1 | 1 |
Knight v. Environmental Quality Councilgreen1 sentence1996Knight v. Environmental Quality Council, 805 P.2d 268, 273 (Wyo.1991); Tri-State Generation & Transmission Ass’n v. Environmental Quality Council, 590 P.2d 1324, 1327 (Wyo.1979). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wyoming. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Burd v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation Division
green
1 sentence2005Div., 2004 WY 108, ¶ 28 , 9Y P.3d 802, 809 (Wyo.2004). ‘When an abuse of discretion is the issue on review, the reviewing court examines the question of whether the agency’s ‘decision was based on a consideration of relevant factors and whether it is rational.’ ” State ex rel. | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State Ex Rel. Sublette County Board of County Commissioners v. State
green
1 sentence2003"There is a heavy burden placed upon an appellant to show such abuse." Id. [¶ 53] In another context, that being review of administrative agency action, we have said that the determination of whether that action was arbitrary, capricious, or an abuse of discretion requires this Court to look to whether the agency's decision is based on a consideration of relevant factors and whether it is rational. | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.