Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1999–2026 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Smithgreen2 sentences2026See Ex parte Couch, 521 So. 2d 987, 989 (Ala. 1988); see also Smith v. Smith, 727 So. 2d 113, 114 (Ala. Civ. 2018See Ex parte Couch , 521 So.2d 987 , 989 (Ala. 1988) ; see also Smith v. Smith , 727 So.2d 113 , 114 (Ala. Civ. | 7 | 7 |
Ex Parte Couchgreen2 sentences2026See Ex parte Couch, 521 So. 2d 987, 989 (Ala. 1988); see also Smith v. Smith, 727 So. 2d 113, 114 (Ala. Civ. 2009Ex parte Couch, 521 So.2d 987, 989 (Ala.1988).” Morgan v. Morgan, 964 So.2d 24, 27 (Ala.Civ.App.2007). “[I]n an original divorce action, the parties stand on an equal footing and no presumption of entitlement to custody inures to either parent. | 6 | 6 |
State of Alaska v. United Statesgreen1 sentence2013See State of Alaska v. United States, 563 F.Supp. 1223 , 1225 n. 3 (D.Alaska 1983). | 1 | 1 |
Hitchings v. Del Rio Woods Recreation & Park Districtgreen2 sentences2013See Hitchings v. Del Rio Woods Recreation and Park Dist., 55 Cal.App.3d 560 , 127 Cal.Rptr. 830, 834 (1976) (‘for purposes of public use of waters, the state may adopt different and less stringent tests of navigability’). 2013See Hitchings v. Del Rio Woods Recreation and Park Dist., 55 Cal.App.3d 560 , 127 Cal.Rptr. 830, 834 (1976) (‘for purposes of public use of waters, the state may adopt different and less stringent tests of navigability’). | 1 | 1 |
Morgan v. Morgangreen1 sentence2009Ex parte Couch, 521 So.2d 987, 989 (Ala.1988).” Morgan v. Morgan, 964 So.2d 24, 27 (Ala.Civ.App.2007). “[I]n an original divorce action, the parties stand on an equal footing and no presumption of entitlement to custody inures to either parent. | 1 | 1 |
Headrick v. Headrickgreen2 sentences2006However, as this court stated in Headrick v. Headrick, 916 So.2d 610, 613-614 (Ala.Civ.App.2005): "An exception to the equal-footing principle concerns cases where domestic violence and abuse have occurred. 2006However, as this court stated in Headrick v. Headrick , 916 So.2d 610 , 613-614 (Ala.Civ.App. 2005): "An exception to the equal-footing principle concerns cases where domestic violence and abuse have occurred. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Santmier v. Santmier
green
2 sentences1999Graham v. Graham, 640 So.2d 963 (Ala.Civ.App.1994); Santmier v. Santmier, 494 So.2d 95 (Ala.Civ.App.1986). 1999Graham v. Graham, 640 So.2d 963 (Ala.Civ.App.1994); Santmier v. Santmier, 494 So.2d 95 (Ala.Civ.App.1986). | 2 | 1999–1999 |
Graham v. Graham
green
2 sentences1999Graham v. Graham, 640 So.2d 963 (Ala.Civ.App.1994); Santmier v. Santmier, 494 So.2d 95 (Ala.Civ.App.1986). 1999Graham v. Graham, 640 So.2d 963 (Ala.Civ.App.1994); Santmier v. Santmier, 494 So.2d 95 (Ala.Civ.App.1986). | 2 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.