Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Tucker v. Stategreen2 sentences2025“An appropriate oral colloquy will focus a defendant’s attention on the value of a jury trial and should make a defendant aware of the likely consequences of the waiver.” Tucker, 559 So. 2d at 220 . 2025“An appropriate oral colloquy will focus a defendant’s attention on the value of a jury trial and should make a defendant aware of the likely consequences of the waiver.” Tucker, 559 So. 2d at 220 . | 4 | 11 |
State v. Uptongreen2 sentences2008Subsequently, the court stated in State v. Upton, 658 So.2d 86, 87 (Fla.1995), that "[w]hen the record contains a written waiver signed by the defendant, the waiver will be upheld." See also Dumas v. State, 439 So.2d 246, 252 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (en banc) (stating that in a direct appeal, the rules of procedure "clearly permit voluntariness to be presumed from the fact of a written waiver of jury trial which appears in the record"); Hall v. State, 498 So.2d 1002, 1003 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (relying on Dumas ); Parker v. State, 636 So.2d 794, 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (following Dumas ). 1996See also State v. Upton, 658 So.2d 86, 87 (Fla.1995); Sansom v. State, 642 So.2d 631, 631-632 (Fla. 1st DCA1994). | 2 | 2 |
Morris v. Stategreen1 sentence2024To obtain a valid oral waiver of a defendant’s right to jury trial, the trial court “must conduct a colloquy that ‘will focus a defendant’s attention on the value of a jury trial and . . . make a defendant aware of the likely consequences of the waiver.’” Morris v. State, 680 So. 2d 544, 545 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996) (quoting Tucker v. State, 559 So. 2d 218, 220 (Fla. 1990)). | 1 | 1 |
Hall v. Stategreen1 sentence2008Subsequently, the court stated in State v. Upton, 658 So.2d 86, 87 (Fla.1995), that "[w]hen the record contains a written waiver signed by the defendant, the waiver will be upheld." See also Dumas v. State, 439 So.2d 246, 252 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (en banc) (stating that in a direct appeal, the rules of procedure "clearly permit voluntariness to be presumed from the fact of a written waiver of jury trial which appears in the record"); Hall v. State, 498 So.2d 1002, 1003 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (relying on Dumas ); Parker v. State, 636 So.2d 794, 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (following Dumas ). | 1 | 1 |
Parker v. Stategreen1 sentence2008Subsequently, the court stated in State v. Upton, 658 So.2d 86, 87 (Fla.1995), that "[w]hen the record contains a written waiver signed by the defendant, the waiver will be upheld." See also Dumas v. State, 439 So.2d 246, 252 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (en banc) (stating that in a direct appeal, the rules of procedure "clearly permit voluntariness to be presumed from the fact of a written waiver of jury trial which appears in the record"); Hall v. State, 498 So.2d 1002, 1003 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (relying on Dumas ); Parker v. State, 636 So.2d 794, 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (following Dumas ). | 1 | 1 |
Dumas v. Stategreen1 sentence2008Subsequently, the court stated in State v. Upton, 658 So.2d 86, 87 (Fla.1995), that "[w]hen the record contains a written waiver signed by the defendant, the waiver will be upheld." See also Dumas v. State, 439 So.2d 246, 252 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983) (en banc) (stating that in a direct appeal, the rules of procedure "clearly permit voluntariness to be presumed from the fact of a written waiver of jury trial which appears in the record"); Hall v. State, 498 So.2d 1002, 1003 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986) (relying on Dumas ); Parker v. State, 636 So.2d 794, 795 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994) (following Dumas ). | 1 | 1 |
Sansom v. Stategreen1 sentence1996See also State v. Upton, 658 So.2d 86, 87 (Fla.1995); Sansom v. State, 642 So.2d 631, 631-632 (Fla. 1st DCA1994). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.