Slappy factors in Florida

2006The Slappy factors are: The presence of one or more of these factors will tend to show that the state's reasons are not actually supported by the record or are an impermissible pretext: (1) alleged group bias not shown to be shared by the juror in question, (2) failure to examine the juror or perfunctory examination, assuming neither the trial court nor opposing counsel had questioned juror, (3) singling the juror out for special questioning designed to evoke a certain response, (4) the prosecutor's reason is unrelated to the facts of the case, and (5) a challenge based on reasons equally appl

2006The Slappy factors are: The presence of one or more of these factors will tend to show that the state's reasons are not actually supported by the record or are an impermissible pretext: (1) alleged group bias not shown to be shared by the juror in question, (2) failure to examine the juror or perfunctory examination, assuming neither the trial court nor opposing counsel had questioned juror, (3) singling the juror out for special questioning designed to evoke a certain response, (4) the prosecutor's reason is unrelated to the facts of the case, and (5) a challenge based on reasons equally appl

1999See Overstreet v. State, 712 So.2d 1174, 1177 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

1999See Overstreet v. State, 712 So.2d 1174, 1177 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998).

1998See Joiner v. State, 618 So.2d 174, 176 (Fla. 1993) (defendant failed to preserve Neil issue in voir dire proceeding where he affirmatively accepted jury without renewing objection prior to jury being sworn); Maultsby v. State, 688 So.2d 1010, 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (defendant’s Slappy objection not preserved for appellate review where he accepted panel by failing to renew objection prior to jury being sworn); Green v. State, 679 So.2d 1294, 1294 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (appellant failed to preserve issue regarding time limitations imposed by trial court during voir dire examination where he affi

1998See Joiner v. State, 618 So.2d 174, 176 (Fla. 1993) (defendant failed to preserve Neil issue in voir dire proceeding where he affirmatively accepted jury without renewing objection prior to jury being sworn); Maultsby v. State, 688 So.2d 1010, 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (defendant’s Slappy objection not preserved for appellate review where he accepted panel by failing to renew objection prior to jury being sworn); Green v. State, 679 So.2d 1294, 1294 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (appellant failed to preserve issue regarding time limitations imposed by trial court during voir dire examination where he affi

1998See Joiner v. State, 618 So.2d 174, 176 (Fla. 1993) (defendant failed to preserve Neil issue in voir dire proceeding where he affirmatively accepted jury without renewing objection prior to jury being sworn); Maultsby v. State, 688 So.2d 1010, 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (defendant’s Slappy objection not preserved for appellate review where he accepted panel by failing to renew objection prior to jury being sworn); Green v. State, 679 So.2d 1294, 1294 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (appellant failed to preserve issue regarding time limitations imposed by trial court during voir dire examination where he affi

1998See Joiner v. State, 618 So.2d 174, 176 (Fla. 1993) (defendant failed to preserve Neil issue in voir dire proceeding where he affirmatively accepted jury without renewing objection prior to jury being sworn); Maultsby v. State, 688 So.2d 1010, 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (defendant’s Slappy objection not preserved for appellate review where he accepted panel by failing to renew objection prior to jury being sworn); Green v. State, 679 So.2d 1294, 1294 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (appellant failed to preserve issue regarding time limitations imposed by trial court during voir dire examination where he affi

1998See Joiner v. State, 618 So.2d 174, 176 (Fla. 1993) (defendant failed to preserve Neil issue in voir dire proceeding where he affirmatively accepted jury without renewing objection prior to jury being sworn); Maultsby v. State, 688 So.2d 1010, 1012 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997) (defendant’s Slappy objection not preserved for appellate review where he accepted panel by failing to renew objection prior to jury being sworn); Green v. State, 679 So.2d 1294, 1294 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996) (appellant failed to preserve issue regarding time limitations imposed by trial court during voir dire examination where he affi

1992See State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla.1984), clarified, State v. Castillo, 486 So.2d 565 (Fla.1986); State v. Slappy, 522 So.2d 18 (Fla.1988), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1219 , 108 S.Ct. 2873 , 101 L.Ed.2d 909 (1988).

1992Judge Ervin explained that "the proper standard of review to be applied to rulings when a Slappy factor is involved is one of competent, substantial evidence within the record." Files, 586 So.2d 352, 360 (Ervin, J., dissenting).

1992Judge Ervin explained that "the proper standard of review to be applied to rulings when a Slappy factor is involved is one of competent, substantial evidence within the record." Files, 586 So.2d 352, 360 (Ervin, J., dissenting).

1992See State v. Neil, 457 So.2d 481 (Fla.1984), clarified, State v. Castillo, 486 So.2d 565 (Fla.1986); State v. Slappy, 522 So.2d 18 (Fla.1988), cert. denied, 487 U.S. 1219 , 108 S.Ct. 2873 , 101 L.Ed.2d 909 (1988).