Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ghay v. Ghaygreen2 sentences2010Ghay v. Ghay, 954 So.2d 1186, 1190 (Fla. 2d DCA 2007). 2008See Ghay, 954 So.2d at 1190 ("If the circuit court issues an order that comports with the evidence presented at the temporary hearing and provides a reasonable temporary resolution of the family's needs in light of their apparent resources, we are unlikely to find any reversible error in the temporary award."). | 2 | 2 |
Hoff v. Hoffgreen2 sentences2017As we explained in Hoff v. Hoff, 100 So.3d 1164 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), “in proceedings where trial judges are required to determine interim timesharing schedules, the limited nature of a temporary hearing and necessity for quick action by the trial judge require us to defer to the trial court’s exercise of its discretion and not pick apart a trial court’s order for technical infirmities.” Id. at 1168 . 2017As we explained in Hoff v. Hoff, 100 So.3d 1164 (Fla. 4th DCA 2012), “in proceedings where trial judges are required to determine interim timesharing schedules, the limited nature of a temporary hearing and necessity for quick action by the trial judge require us to defer to the trial court’s exercise of its discretion and not pick apart a trial court’s order for technical infirmities.” Id. at 1168 . | 1 | 3 |
Contreras, Jonasz & Camacho, P.A. v. Fernandezgreen1 sentence2011Id. at 976-77 (footnote omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Mitzenmacher v. Mitzenmachergreen1 sentence2005Mitzenmacher v. Mitzenmacher, 656 So.2d 178, 180 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995). | 1 | 1 |
Canakaris v. Canakarisgreen1 sentence1988Id. at 1205 (emphasis added). [2] While some attorneys might be inclined to undertake representation without initial compensation, other capable attorneys may be unwilling to assist an impecunious spouse beyond a temporary hearing based on speculative fees that may be awarded many months later. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
KRISTAL RYAN v. ROBERT RYAN
green
1 sentence2019The statute thus instructs that where an objection is filed, or good cause exists, “the parent or other person may not relocate, and must proceed to a temporary hearing or trial and obtain court permission to relocate.” Id. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.
green
2 sentences2018In Perkins, the Court ruled that Ohio could exercise general jurisdiction over a Philippine mining corporation because Ohio was the company’s temporary principle place of business while the Japanese were occupying the Philippine Islands during World War II. 342 U.S. at 447 . 2018Although the company had halted mining operations due to the Japanese occupation, the company’s president and principle stockholder maintained an office in Ohio where he carried out “a continuous and systematic supervision of the necessarily limited wartime activities of the company.” Id. at 448 . 9 In Helicopteros, a case arising out of a helicopter crash in Peru, the Court held that general jurisdiction over a Colombian corporation was improper because its contacts with Texas—a contract negotiation session, accepting checks drawn on a Texas bank, purchasing 80% of its helicopter fleet along | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. Hall
green
1 sentence2018Although the company had halted mining operations due to the Japanese occupation, the company’s president and principle stockholder maintained an office in Ohio where he carried out “a continuous and systematic supervision of the necessarily limited wartime activities of the company.” Id. at 448 . 9 In Helicopteros, a case arising out of a helicopter crash in Peru, the Court held that general jurisdiction over a Colombian corporation was improper because its contacts with Texas—a contract negotiation session, accepting checks drawn on a Texas bank, purchasing 80% of its helicopter fleet along | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Weiand v. State
green
1 sentence2000Comment This instruction is essentially the same as the temporary instruction adopted by the Florida Supreme Court in Weiand v. State, 732 So.2d 1044 (Fla.1999). | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.