Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
11 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2023 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
McCormick v. Gearingergreen2 sentences2021See McCormick v. Gearinger, 253 Ga. 531, 533 (3) (322 SE2d 716) (1984) (“[Defendant’s] failure to file a written plea in bar before 9 his second trial operates as a waiver of his subsequent challenge on double jeopardy grounds.” (citations omitted)); see also Prince v. State, 299 Ga. App. 164, 171 (4) (682 SE2d 180) (2009) (holding that failure to file a plea in bar waives appellate review of collateral estoppel claim); Collins, 266 Ga. App. at 874-875 (2) n.10 (claim based on procedural double jeopardy was not preserved for appeal because no plea in bar was filed). 2021See McCormick v. Gearinger, 253 Ga. 531, 533 (3) (322 SE2d 716) (1984) (“[Defendant’s] failure to file a written plea in bar before 9 his second trial operates as a waiver of his subsequent challenge on double jeopardy grounds.” (citations omitted)); see also Prince v. State, 299 Ga. App. 164, 171 (4) (682 SE2d 180) (2009) (holding that failure to file a plea in bar waives appellate review of collateral estoppel claim); Collins, 266 Ga. App. at 874-875 (2) n.10 (claim based on procedural double jeopardy was not preserved for appeal because no plea in bar was filed). | 6 | 6 |
Alexander v. Stategreen2 sentences2023Finally, to the extent the record shows that trial counsel expressed an intent to raise the issue at trial, it is well-settled that “a defendant’s failure to file a written plea in bar prior to a second trial waives the right to subsequently raise a challenge on procedural double jeopardy grounds.” (Citation omitted.) Alexander v. State, 279 Ga. 683, 685 (2) (b) ( 620 SE2d 792 ) (2005). 2023Finally, to the extent the record shows that trial counsel expressed an intent to raise the issue at trial, it is well-settled that “a defendant’s failure to file a written plea in bar prior to a second trial waives the right to subsequently raise a challenge on procedural double jeopardy grounds.” (Citation omitted.) Alexander v. State, 279 Ga. 683, 685 (2) (b) ( 620 SE2d 792 ) (2005). | 3 | 4 |
Collins v. Stategreen2 sentences2021See McCormick v. Gearinger, 253 Ga. 531, 533 (3) ( 322 SE2d 716 ) (1984) (“[Defendant’s] failure to file a written plea in bar before his second trial operates as a waiver of his subsequent challenge on double jeopardy grounds.” (citations omitted)); see also Prince v. 9 State, 299 Ga. App. 164, 171 (4) ( 682 SE2d 180 ) (2009) (holding that failure to file a plea in bar waives appellate review of collateral estoppel claim); Collins v. State, 266 Ga. App. 871, 874-875 (2) n.10 ( 601 SE2d 111 ) (2004) (claim based on procedural double jeopardy was not preserved for appeal because no plea in bar 2021See McCormick v. Gearinger, 253 Ga. 531, 533 (3) ( 322 SE2d 716 ) (1984) (“[Defendant’s] failure to file a written plea in bar before his second trial operates as a waiver of his subsequent challenge on double jeopardy grounds.” (citations omitted)); see also Prince v. 9 State, 299 Ga. App. 164, 171 (4) ( 682 SE2d 180 ) (2009) (holding that failure to file a plea in bar waives appellate review of collateral estoppel claim); Collins v. State, 266 Ga. App. 871, 874-875 (2) n.10 ( 601 SE2d 111 ) (2004) (claim based on procedural double jeopardy was not preserved for appeal because no plea in bar | 1 | 1 |
Prince v. Stategreen2 sentences2021See McCormick v. Gearinger, 253 Ga. 531, 533 (3) (322 SE2d 716) (1984) (“[Defendant’s] failure to file a written plea in bar before 9 his second trial operates as a waiver of his subsequent challenge on double jeopardy grounds.” (citations omitted)); see also Prince v. State, 299 Ga. App. 164, 171 (4) (682 SE2d 180) (2009) (holding that failure to file a plea in bar waives appellate review of collateral estoppel claim); Collins, 266 Ga. App. at 874-875 (2) n.10 (claim based on procedural double jeopardy was not preserved for appeal because no plea in bar was filed). 2021See McCormick v. Gearinger, 253 Ga. 531, 533 (3) (322 SE2d 716) (1984) (“[Defendant’s] failure to file a written plea in bar before 9 his second trial operates as a waiver of his subsequent challenge on double jeopardy grounds.” (citations omitted)); see also Prince v. State, 299 Ga. App. 164, 171 (4) (682 SE2d 180) (2009) (holding that failure to file a plea in bar waives appellate review of collateral estoppel claim); Collins, 266 Ga. App. at 874-875 (2) n.10 (claim based on procedural double jeopardy was not preserved for appeal because no plea in bar was filed). | 1 | 1 |
Battles v. Stategreen2 sentences2013When the attorney entered the case, Riddick had already waived the right to raise a challenge on procedural double jeopardy grounds because he had failed to file a written plea in bar prior to the second trial.15 The failure of Riddick’s trial attorney in the third trial to file a meritless motion does not amount to ineffective assistance.16 Thus, Riddick has not shown that his attorney in the third trial performed deficiently by failing to file a plea in bar prior to the third trial. 14 Thomas v. State, 318 Ga. App. 849 (5) ( 734 SE2d 823 ) (2012), citing Battles v. State, 290 Ga. 226, 229 (2 2013When the attorney entered the case, Riddick had already waived the right to raise a challenge on procedural double jeopardy grounds because he had failed to file a written plea in bar prior to the second trial.15 The failure of Riddick’s trial attorney in the third trial to file a meritless motion does not amount to ineffective assistance.16 Thus, Riddick has not shown that his attorney in the third trial performed deficiently by failing to file a plea in bar prior to the third trial. 14 Thomas v. State, 318 Ga. App. 849 (5) ( 734 SE2d 823 ) (2012), citing Battles v. State, 290 Ga. 226, 229 (2 | 1 | 1 |
Martin v. Stategreen2 sentences2013“As a general rule, a defendant’s failure to file a written plea in bar prior to a second trial waives the right to subsequently raise a challenge on procedural double 7 See Judice v. State, 308 Ga. App. 229 , 231-232 (2) ( 707 SE2d 114 ) (2011) (child molestation conviction affirmed where evidence showed that defendant violated the statute prohibiting child molestation in at least two of the ways alleged in the conjunctive in the indictment); Martin v. State, 299 Ga. App. 845, 847 (1) ( 683 SE2d 896 ) (2009) (victim’s testimony alone was sufficient to establish that defendant had committed ch 2013“As a general rule, a defendant’s failure to file a written plea in bar prior to a second trial waives the right to subsequently raise a challenge on procedural double 7 See Judice v. State, 308 Ga. App. 229 , 231-232 (2) ( 707 SE2d 114 ) (2011) (child molestation conviction affirmed where evidence showed that defendant violated the statute prohibiting child molestation in at least two of the ways alleged in the conjunctive in the indictment); Martin v. State, 299 Ga. App. 845, 847 (1) ( 683 SE2d 896 ) (2009) (victim’s testimony alone was sufficient to establish that defendant had committed ch | 1 | 1 |
Lupoe v. Stategreen2 sentences2013When the attorney entered the case, Riddick had already waived the right to raise a challenge on procedural double jeopardy grounds because he had failed to file a written plea in bar prior to the second trial.15 The failure of Riddick’s trial attorney in the third trial to file a meritless motion does not amount to ineffective assistance.16 Thus, Riddick has not shown that his attorney in the third trial performed deficiently by failing to file a plea in bar prior to the third trial. 14 Thomas v. State, 318 Ga. App. 849 (5) ( 734 SE2d 823 ) (2012), citing Battles v. State, 290 Ga. 226, 229 (2 2013When the attorney entered the case, Riddick had already waived the right to raise a challenge on procedural double jeopardy grounds because he had failed to file a written plea in bar prior to the second trial.15 The failure of Riddick’s trial attorney in the third trial to file a meritless motion does not amount to ineffective assistance.16 Thus, Riddick has not shown that his attorney in the third trial performed deficiently by failing to file a plea in bar prior to the third trial. 14 Thomas v. State, 318 Ga. App. 849 (5) ( 734 SE2d 823 ) (2012), citing Battles v. State, 290 Ga. 226, 229 (2 | 1 | 1 |
McCutchen v. Stategreen2 sentences2010If not made in writing at the proper time, a plea of former jeopardy is waived.” (Citations omitted.) McCutchen v. State, 177 Ga. App. 719, 722 (4) ( 341 SE2d 260 ) (1986). 2010If not made in writing at the proper time, a plea of former jeopardy is waived.” (Citations omitted.) McCutchen v. State, 177 Ga. App. 719, 722 (4) ( 341 SE2d 260 ) (1986). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Judice v. State
green
1 sentence2013“As a general rule, a defendant’s failure to file a written plea in bar prior to a second trial waives the right to subsequently raise a challenge on procedural double 7 See Judice v. State, 308 Ga. App. 229 , 231-232 (2) ( 707 SE2d 114 ) (2011) (child molestation conviction affirmed where evidence showed that defendant violated the statute prohibiting child molestation in at least two of the ways alleged in the conjunctive in the indictment); Martin v. State, 299 Ga. App. 845, 847 (1) ( 683 SE2d 896 ) (2009) (victim’s testimony alone was sufficient to establish that defendant had committed ch | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Hooks v. State
green
1 sentence2013When the attorney entered the case, Riddick had already waived the right to raise a challenge on procedural double jeopardy grounds because he had failed to file a written plea in bar prior to the second trial.15 The failure of Riddick’s trial attorney in the third trial to file a meritless motion does not amount to ineffective assistance.16 Thus, Riddick has not shown that his attorney in the third trial performed deficiently by failing to file a plea in bar prior to the third trial. 14 Thomas v. State, 318 Ga. App. 849 (5) ( 734 SE2d 823 ) (2012), citing Battles v. State, 290 Ga. 226, 229 (2 | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Judice v. State
green
1 sentence2013“As a general rule, a defendant’s failure to file a written plea in bar prior to a second trial waives the right to subsequently raise a challenge on procedural double 7 See Judice v. State, 308 Ga. App. 229 , 231-232 (2) ( 707 SE2d 114 ) (2011) (child molestation conviction affirmed where evidence showed that defendant violated the statute prohibiting child molestation in at least two of the ways alleged in the conjunctive in the indictment); Martin v. State, 299 Ga. App. 845, 847 (1) ( 683 SE2d 896 ) (2009) (victim’s testimony alone was sufficient to establish that defendant had committed ch | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Thomas v. State
green
2 sentences2013When the attorney entered the case, Riddick had already waived the right to raise a challenge on procedural double jeopardy grounds because he had failed to file a written plea in bar prior to the second trial.15 The failure of Riddick’s trial attorney in the third trial to file a meritless motion does not amount to ineffective assistance.16 Thus, Riddick has not shown that his attorney in the third trial performed deficiently by failing to file a plea in bar prior to the third trial. 14 Thomas v. State, 318 Ga. App. 849 (5) ( 734 SE2d 823 ) (2012), citing Battles v. State, 290 Ga. 226, 229 (2 2013When the attorney entered the case, Riddick had already waived the right to raise a challenge on procedural double jeopardy grounds because he had failed to file a written plea in bar prior to the second trial.15 The failure of Riddick’s trial attorney in the third trial to file a meritless motion does not amount to ineffective assistance.16 Thus, Riddick has not shown that his attorney in the third trial performed deficiently by failing to file a plea in bar prior to the third trial. 14 Thomas v. State, 318 Ga. App. 849 (5) ( 734 SE2d 823 ) (2012), citing Battles v. State, 290 Ga. 226, 229 (2 | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Helms v. Young
green
1 sentence2013When the attorney entered the case, Riddick had already waived the right to raise a challenge on procedural double jeopardy grounds because he had failed to file a written plea in bar prior to the second trial.15 The failure of Riddick’s trial attorney in the third trial to file a meritless motion does not amount to ineffective assistance.16 Thus, Riddick has not shown that his attorney in the third trial performed deficiently by failing to file a plea in bar prior to the third trial. 14 Thomas v. State, 318 Ga. App. 849 (5) ( 734 SE2d 823 ) (2012), citing Battles v. State, 290 Ga. 226, 229 (2 | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Bryant v. State
green
2 sentences1984OCGA § 17-7-111; Bryant v. State, 224 Ga. 235 ( 161 SE2d 312 ) (1968); Jones v. State, 148 Ga. App. 637 (4) ( 252 SE2d 65 ) (1979); Holmes v. State, 120 Ga. App. 281 (1) ( 170 SE2d 312 ) (1969); Reid v. State, 119 Ga. App. 368 (4) ( 166 SE2d 900 ) (1969). 1984OCGA § 17-7-111; Bryant v. State, 224 Ga. 235 ( 161 SE2d 312 ) (1968); Jones v. State, 148 Ga. App. 637 (4) ( 252 SE2d 65 ) (1979); Holmes v. State, 120 Ga. App. 281 (1) ( 170 SE2d 312 ) (1969); Reid v. State, 119 Ga. App. 368 (4) ( 166 SE2d 900 ) (1969). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Holmes v. State
green
2 sentences1984OCGA § 17-7-111; Bryant v. State, 224 Ga. 235 ( 161 SE2d 312 ) (1968); Jones v. State, 148 Ga. App. 637 (4) ( 252 SE2d 65 ) (1979); Holmes v. State, 120 Ga. App. 281 (1) ( 170 SE2d 312 ) (1969); Reid v. State, 119 Ga. App. 368 (4) ( 166 SE2d 900 ) (1969). 1984OCGA § 17-7-111; Bryant v. State, 224 Ga. 235 ( 161 SE2d 312 ) (1968); Jones v. State, 148 Ga. App. 637 (4) ( 252 SE2d 65 ) (1979); Holmes v. State, 120 Ga. App. 281 (1) ( 170 SE2d 312 ) (1969); Reid v. State, 119 Ga. App. 368 (4) ( 166 SE2d 900 ) (1969). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Reid v. State
green
2 sentences1984OCGA § 17-7-111; Bryant v. State, 224 Ga. 235 ( 161 SE2d 312 ) (1968); Jones v. State, 148 Ga. App. 637 (4) ( 252 SE2d 65 ) (1979); Holmes v. State, 120 Ga. App. 281 (1) ( 170 SE2d 312 ) (1969); Reid v. State, 119 Ga. App. 368 (4) ( 166 SE2d 900 ) (1969). 1984OCGA § 17-7-111; Bryant v. State, 224 Ga. 235 ( 161 SE2d 312 ) (1968); Jones v. State, 148 Ga. App. 637 (4) ( 252 SE2d 65 ) (1979); Holmes v. State, 120 Ga. App. 281 (1) ( 170 SE2d 312 ) (1969); Reid v. State, 119 Ga. App. 368 (4) ( 166 SE2d 900 ) (1969). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Jones v. State
green
2 sentences1984OCGA § 17-7-111; Bryant v. State, 224 Ga. 235 ( 161 SE2d 312 ) (1968); Jones v. State, 148 Ga. App. 637 (4) ( 252 SE2d 65 ) (1979); Holmes v. State, 120 Ga. App. 281 (1) ( 170 SE2d 312 ) (1969); Reid v. State, 119 Ga. App. 368 (4) ( 166 SE2d 900 ) (1969). 1984OCGA § 17-7-111; Bryant v. State, 224 Ga. 235 ( 161 SE2d 312 ) (1968); Jones v. State, 148 Ga. App. 637 (4) ( 252 SE2d 65 ) (1979); Holmes v. State, 120 Ga. App. 281 (1) ( 170 SE2d 312 ) (1969); Reid v. State, 119 Ga. App. 368 (4) ( 166 SE2d 900 ) (1969). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.