11 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1935–2026 4 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Iowa Comprehensive Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Fund Board v. Federated Mutual Insurance Co.green2 sentences2021Ins., 596 N.W.2d 546, 552 (Iowa 1999)). 2021Ins., 596 N.W.2d 546, 552 (Iowa 1999)). | 2 | 2 |
Dutrac Community Credit Union v. Douglas P. Hefel and Sheila K. Hefelgreen2 sentences2021“The essential elements of a waiver are the existence of a right, knowledge, actual or constructive, and an intention to relinquish such a right.” Id. (quoting Iowa Comprehensive Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Fund Bd. v. Federated Mut. 2021“The essential elements of a waiver are the existence of a right, knowledge, actual or constructive, and an intention to relinquish such a right.” Id. (quoting Iowa Comprehensive Petroleum Underground Storage Tank Fund Bd. v. Federated Mut. | 1 | 4 |
Turner v. Zip Motors, Inc.green1 sentence2026See Turner v. Zip Motors, Inc., 65 N.W.2d 427, 431 (Iowa 1954) (“[I]f through the tort of A, B is in good faith involved in litigation with C, . . . | 1 | 1 |
Snethen v. Stategreen1 sentence1995Id.; Snethen v. State, 308 N.W.2d 11, 14 (Iowa 1981). | 1 | 1 |
Scheetz v. IMT Ins. Co.(Mut.)green1 sentence1989“The essential elements of a waiver are the existence of a right, knowledge, actual or constructive, and an intention to relinquish such right.” Scheetz v. IMT Insurance Co., 324 N.W.2d 302, 304 (Iowa 1982). | 1 | 1 |
Children v. Burtongreen1 sentence1984Children v. Burton, 331 N.W.2d 673, 678-79 (Iowa), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 155 , 78 L.Ed.2d 143 (1983). | 1 | 1 |
Perkins v. City National Bank of Clintongreen2 sentences1982Perkins v. City National Bank of Clinton, 253 Iowa 922, 935 , 114 N.W.2d 45, 52 (1962). 1982Perkins v. City National Bank of Clinton, 253 Iowa 922, 935 , 114 N.W.2d 45, 52 (1962). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Fields
green
2 sentences1999“The essential elements of a waiver are the existence of a right, knowledge, actual or constructive, and an intention to relinquish such right.” Id. 1999Waiver can be express, “shown by the affirmative acts of a party,” or implied, “inferred from conduct that supports the conclusion waiver was intended.” Id. | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Tabone v. Posner
green
1 sentence1984Children v. Burton, 331 N.W.2d 673, 678-79 (Iowa), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 155 , 78 L.Ed.2d 143 (1983). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Children v. Burton
green
1 sentence1984Children v. Burton, 331 N.W.2d 673, 678-79 (Iowa), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 155 , 78 L.Ed.2d 143 (1983). | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Goben v. Akin
neutral
2 sentences1935One of the essential elements of this defense is that there is an identity of parties or their privies in both actions. *893 In the case of King City, Mo., v. Southern Surety Co., 212 Iowa 1230 , on page 1235, 238 N. W. 93, 96 , it is said: “ It is elementary that in order for a judgment in a former action to constitute res adjudicata or an estoppel, the subsequent action must be between the same parties or privies of the parties to the former litigation.1 ’ In the case of Goben v. Akin, 208 Iowa 1354 , on pages 1358, 1359, 227 N. W. 400, 402 , this court said: “It is said that the court shoul 1935One of the essential elements of this defense is that there is an identity of parties or their privies in both actions. *893 In the case of King City, Mo., v. Southern Surety Co., 212 Iowa 1230 , on page 1235, 238 N. W. 93, 96 , it is said: “ It is elementary that in order for a judgment in a former action to constitute res adjudicata or an estoppel, the subsequent action must be between the same parties or privies of the parties to the former litigation.1 ’ In the case of Goben v. Akin, 208 Iowa 1354 , on pages 1358, 1359, 227 N. W. 400, 402 , this court said: “It is said that the court shoul | 1 | 1935–1935 |
King City Ex Rel. United States Cast Iron Pipe & Foundry Co. v. Southern Surety Co.
green
2 sentences1935One of the essential elements of this defense is that there is an identity of parties or their privies in both actions. *893 In the case of King City, Mo., v. Southern Surety Co., 212 Iowa 1230 , on page 1235, 238 N. W. 93, 96 , it is said: “ It is elementary that in order for a judgment in a former action to constitute res adjudicata or an estoppel, the subsequent action must be between the same parties or privies of the parties to the former litigation.1 ’ In the case of Goben v. Akin, 208 Iowa 1354 , on pages 1358, 1359, 227 N. W. 400, 402 , this court said: “It is said that the court shoul 1935One of the essential elements of this defense is that there is an identity of parties or their privies in both actions. *893 In the case of King City, Mo., v. Southern Surety Co., 212 Iowa 1230 , on page 1235, 238 N. W. 93, 96 , it is said: “ It is elementary that in order for a judgment in a former action to constitute res adjudicata or an estoppel, the subsequent action must be between the same parties or privies of the parties to the former litigation.1 ’ In the case of Goben v. Akin, 208 Iowa 1354 , on pages 1358, 1359, 227 N. W. 400, 402 , this court said: “It is said that the court shoul | 1 | 1935–1935 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.