11 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1877–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hogrefegreen1 sentence2016In State v. Hogrefe, 557 N.W.2d 871, 881 (Iowa 1996), we reversed for a new trial when the jury returned a general verdict and not all the theories were supported by substantial evidence. | 1 | 1 |
Stover v. Lakeland Square Owners Ass'ngreen1 sentence1992Nichols v. Schweitzer, 472 N.W.2d 266, 274 (Iowa 1991); Stover v. Lakeland Square Owners Ass’n, 434 N.W.2d 866, 868 (Iowa 1989). | 1 | 1 |
Nichols v. Schweitzergreen1 sentence1992Nichols v. Schweitzer, 472 N.W.2d 266, 274 (Iowa 1991); Stover v. Lakeland Square Owners Ass’n, 434 N.W.2d 866, 868 (Iowa 1989). | 1 | 1 |
Hamilton v. Luckeygreen1 sentence1983Hamilton v. Luckey, 315 N.W.2d 823, 826 (Iowa App.1981). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Griffin v. United States
green
2 sentences2016Tyler responded in his closing argument that the first assault could not be the basis for joint criminal conduct because “there is no evidence that that first assault . . . involved anyone other than Kent Tyler.” Based on our review of the record, the jury never considered the possibility that the forming of the circle around Daughenbaugh constituted an assault. 21 evidence is insufficient to support an alternative legal theory of liability, it would generally be preferable for the court to give an instruction removing that theory from the jury’s consideration.” Id. at 60 , 112 S. Ct. at 474 , 2016Tyler responded in his closing argument that the first assault could not be the basis for joint criminal conduct because “there is no evidence that that first assault . . . involved anyone other than Kent Tyler.” Based on our review of the record, the jury never considered the possibility that the forming of the circle around Daughenbaugh constituted an assault. 21 evidence is insufficient to support an alternative legal theory of liability, it would generally be preferable for the court to give an instruction removing that theory from the jury’s consideration.” Id. at 60 , 112 S. Ct. at 474 , | 3 | 2014–2016 |
Atherton v. Hoenig's Grocery
green
2 sentences1968That contention may at one time have found support in Atherton v. Hoenig’s Grocery, 249 Iowa 50, 54-55 , 86 N.W.2d 252 , but is no longer applicable Iowa law in cases such as that now before us. 1968That contention may at one time have found support in Atherton v. Hoenig’s Grocery, 249 Iowa 50, 54-55 , 86 N.W.2d 252 , but is no longer applicable Iowa law in cases such as that now before us. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
State v. Schenk
green
2 sentences1951In State v. Schenk, 236 Iowa 178, 195 , 18 N.W.2d 169, 177 , the court held that it was not a reversible error in the absence of a request to give a certain instruction under the particular circumstances therein applicable, and it was therein stated: “As we read the record there was no special defense. 1951In State v. Schenk, 236 Iowa 178, 195 , 18 N.W.2d 169, 177 , the court held that it was not a reversible error in the absence of a request to give a certain instruction under the particular circumstances therein applicable, and it was therein stated: “As we read the record there was no special defense. | 1 | 1951–1951 |
State v. Elliott
green
1 sentence1930The jurors would know nothing about this statute, if they were not informed by the court, and we think it was proper for the court to give the instruction in question.” In State v. Elliott, 198 Iowa 71 (1924), we said: “The only remaining question requiring consideration is the contention that the court committed error in Paragraph 7 of its charge to the jury. | 1 | 1930–1930 |
Carlton v. People
green
2 sentences1909We find nothing in the case of State v. Johnson, 19 Iowa, 230 , or that of Carlton v. People, 150 Ill. 181 ( 37 N. E. 244 , 41 Am. 1909We find nothing in the case of State v. Johnson, 19 Iowa, 230 , or that of Carlton v. People, 150 Ill. 181 ( 37 N. E. 244 , 41 Am. | 1 | 1909–1909 |
State v. Johnson
neutral
1 sentence1909We find nothing in the case of State v. Johnson, 19 Iowa, 230 , or that of Carlton v. People, 150 Ill. 181 ( 37 N. E. 244 , 41 Am. | 1 | 1909–1909 |
People v. Gage
green
2 sentences1902It Avas therefore proper for the court to give an instruction to the effect that the jury might consider the failure of prosecutrix to make complaint as affecting the credibility of her testimony, and in connection therewith might consider any excuse, if any appeared, why such complaint was not made; for the failure to make complaint does not render the testimony of prosecutrix inadmissible, but is a circumstance for the jury to consider as affecting the credit to be given to it (State v. Snider, 119 Iowa —); and, while the cases on the subject relate generally to the admissibility and weight 1902It Avas therefore proper for the court to give an instruction to the effect that the jury might consider the failure of prosecutrix to make complaint as affecting the credibility of her testimony, and in connection therewith might consider any excuse, if any appeared, why such complaint was not made; for the failure to make complaint does not render the testimony of prosecutrix inadmissible, but is a circumstance for the jury to consider as affecting the credit to be given to it (State v. Snider, 119 Iowa —); and, while the cases on the subject relate generally to the admissibility and weight | 1 | 1902–1902 |
Milburn v. City of Cedar Rapids
green
1 sentence1877The case of Milburn et al. v. The City of Cedar Rapids et al., 12 Iowa, 246 , cited by appellant, differs in two respects. | 1 | 1877–1877 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.